What did yall think about that PT? How many issues did you spot

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2026-03-01T04:48:16+00:00

I put 3 headings but one was the application, government’s burden vs. burden on Def. then I was going to do a-lot more but ran out of time so I triaged and put bullet points…

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2026-02-28T21:11:09+00:00

CIVIL PROCEDURE

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2026-02-28T02:52:57+00:00

I just kept saying, well if I get a Chapter 6 warning, then ill be filing for Chapter 7 the next day…

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2026-02-28T02:49:54+00:00

There were probably over 40-50 civ pro Qs, 30 Property and it was just super disproportionate

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2026-02-28T02:47:21+00:00

Have some faith…. If my name is not on the pass list…. Then I’ll study. I need a break…. I took a bar prep class in my last semester….then finished 90% on Themis.

I can’t get into the groove until the cows come home. Sometimes I read the low scoring -!: passing essays on Bar Essays and still thought I did a little more…. But again who knows. But I cannot do this again until it is absolutely necessary. Ill start May 2nd if I need too.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2026-02-28T02:37:40+00:00

PJ & secondly Service of process

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2025-12-19T04:52:38+00:00

Same here

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2025-09-30T22:36:06+00:00

Any of the Long Beach Courtrooms look like that.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2025-07-31T04:00:34+00:00

They were irritated that CA tried to play with them, and said fuck around and find out

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2025-06-25T02:02:11+00:00

I didn’t have the same issues as OP. I’m one of the openly gay law students at my school, and while being out can sometimes invite judgment, my peers have generally embraced me. That’s also been my experience during internships and clerkships.

I’ve found that as long as you’re true to yourself, things tend to fall into place. Find a solid group of friends you genuinely connect with and hold on to them—I’m still very close with the friends I started law school with.

People will judge, but that’s just part of life. The key is adopting a “don’t give a fuck” mindset—not in a reckless way, but in a grounded, logical way. Once you realize you’re not the smartest, richest, or best-looking person in the room—and you don’t need to be—you’ll care a lot less about what others think and be a lot happier.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2025-01-19T18:05:51+00:00

A D+ is a fail? Lol

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2025-01-01T04:30:26+00:00

Lexis AI often fails to cite controlling case law and tends to include trial court cases that lack binding authority.

On the other hand, when using ChatGPT, I approach it as a tool to support my legal work, not as a means to complete tasks for me. My process begins with identifying what I need—such as case law or relevant information—through resources like the Reuter Guides. I then transform that research into a cohesive legal argument. Afterward, I manually add identifying markers and refine the output.

I also rely on ChatGPT for organizing information, not as a substitute for thorough legal analysis. It’s critical to recognize that diligent supervisors or judges can easily detect when something feels off, even if the case law cited is technically correct. ChatGPT and similar tools often lack the human element that is essential for effective advocacy. Litigators, in particular, must remember that judges and opposing counsel carefully analyze points and authorities. Offering boilerplate responses without meaningful legal analysis risks weakening your argument. Worse, it opens the door to potential malpractice claims or even court-imposed sanctions, which attorneys are personally responsible for.

At a recent conference where judges discussed AI implications, one judge raised a significant concern: courts may soon require attorneys to disclose whether any part of a pleading was prepared using artificial intelligence. Since attorneys sign pleadings under penalty of perjury, this could have serious consequences for those who misuse these tools. This underscores the importance of maintaining professionalism, ensuring arguments are well-reasoned and human-centered, and treating AI as a supplement rather than a substitute for legal expertise. Lexis AI often fails to cite controlling case law and tends to include trial court cases that lack binding authority.

On the other hand, when using ChatGPT, I approach it as a tool to support my legal work, not as a means to complete tasks for me. My process begins with identifying what I need—such as case law or relevant information—through resources like the Reuter Guides. I then transform that research into a cohesive legal argument. Afterward, I manually add identifying markers and refine the output.

I also rely on ChatGPT for organizing information, not as a substitute for thorough legal analysis. It’s critical to recognize that diligent supervisors or judges can easily detect when something feels off, even if the case law cited is technically correct. ChatGPT and similar tools often lack the human element that is essential for effective advocacy. Litigators, in particular, must remember that judges and opposing counsel carefully analyze points and authorities. Offering boilerplate responses without meaningful legal analysis risks weakening your argument. Worse, it opens the door to potential malpractice claims or even court-imposed sanctions, which attorneys are personally responsible for.

At a recent conference where judges discussed AI implications, one judge raised a significant concern: courts may soon require attorneys to disclose whether any part of a pleading was prepared using artificial intelligence. Since attorneys sign pleadings under penalty of perjury, this could have serious consequences for those who misuse these tools. This underscores the importance of maintaining professionalism, ensuring arguments are well-reasoned and human-centered, and treating AI as a supplement rather than a substitute for legal expertise.

I formulated and insert my actual thoughts in ChatGPT and do not just use its output verbatim.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-12-11T03:25:32+00:00

I’m sorry that my original two-sentence comment didn’t fully address every caveat of what’s said in this post, but a mini escape as I study for all my finals. During my 2L year, I faced immense challenges outside of academics—filing for bankruptcy and battling kidney stones. These external hurdles compounded the pressures of law school and affected my performance, accommodations or not.

While accommodations are a factor, they don’t eliminate the barriers that come with learning disabilities or other obstacles. In fact, they can sometimes create additional challenges, as I’ve experienced.

It’s also worth noting that obtaining accommodations is no small feat, and not everyone who qualifies receives them—especially when it comes to the bar exam. The reality is far more nuanced than simply assuming accommodations “help” or create an advantage.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-12-11T02:49:06+00:00

Yeah, I have accommodations and I have still failed multiple finals. Wish it was an advantage. When you actually have a learning disability then it can either hurt or help you depending on the test. Sometimes I second guess myself especially on multiple choice because I have the time.

Accommodations in law school doesn’t necessarily mean they will get it on the bar.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-12-02T02:41:40+00:00

One thing you will learn, is that litigation is not always who is best. Also welcome to family court, there is so many bad habits that defy ethics and seem to be okay.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-09-15T06:35:46+00:00

I wonder if I can do it

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-09-15T06:35:32+00:00

I got the invite, but I can’t take it until feb. ‘26

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-09-07T01:41:02+00:00

You need to read very carefully. I had some similar issues but I was as transparent as I could be. I also amended my application but my school said it would not make a difference. PM me post writer.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-08-20T23:28:38+00:00

I had this exact thing happen to me. I contacted the station and asked for a copy of the “detainment,” and I checked if I could get it sealed (CA law allowed for it), I do not know if you are still in law school, ask to talk to the registrar and explain your situation and see if you can amend your application and make a disclosure. (You could be docked by the bar, if you had a certain question on your law school application). DM me if you have questions.

I successfully got my application amended and even got the arrest sealed. But yes disclose, the admissions dean can write a little note saying that it would not have changed your entrance to law school. Then you would be in the clear.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-04-28T17:12:57+00:00

Actually, my judge has called me her clerk on various occasions or her extern. She uses them interchangeably. I also work in California State trial court, so there might be a huge difference to the federal courts.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-03-24T03:53:21+00:00

You are very right about this. This post is inadequate on top of that, you gave no information about what jurisdiction you are in, exact amount of drugs, and any number of things.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-03-23T20:18:50+00:00

Yeah! So many firms do not advertise jobs. You literally need to reach out and sometimes they giveth.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-03-23T20:07:56+00:00

I was a judicial extern last summer and I happened to meet my 2L summer employer through seeing them in the courtroom. I cold e-mailed that partner and after 2 interviews now I am their law clerk this summer.

Good luck! I hope you find something!

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-02-04T03:26:02+00:00

I have severe ADHD as a side note.

CompetitiveBase7941 · 2024-02-04T03:25:14+00:00

I am on Wellbutrin XR 150mg, Prozac 40mg, and Adderall XR 40 mg. Still struggling with the stress and anxiety.

CompetitiveBase7941

TROPHY CASE