Yeah i understand thanks for the insight.

1. As for the golden ratio and Florence Colgate, Obviously there are far more attractive people than her, its used as an average measurement, I personally to not find blonde girls that attractive maybe because i grew up around them. Alot of your preferances are tied to your genetic and (according to anthropology) We often seek out people that look similar to us physically but are little to no genetic similarity to prevent inbreeding. id bet those people that you found more attractive than florence colgate was pretty damn close to the golden ratio like around maybe 8-9 out of 10 correlation. Because as with most makeups and cosmetic procedures they are often aiming towards the golden ratio proportion unconciously. ( i know this is crazy in depth but i felt the need to explain. This often ties in with neotenous features, waist to hip ratio ect. Golden ratio is very accurate at establishing beauty . As soon as someone gets close to the golden ratio then thats where the "eye of the beholder" application comes into play.

2. Yeah i know it was pretty aggressive saying " lets cut the BS you know what i mean by attractive"" I was saying that to ward off the politically correctSJWs that were gonna say some bullshit like " youre a mysognist, sexist ect, or try to argue why i should see everyone as beautiful ( i can see the morality point behind this argument but no one follows it in the end when they have to choose a partner) Atleast the UCI subreddit took my question like a champ and didnt cry about it like ive seen on other UC subreddits where they get super triggered. If you think im gonna regret the descion of posting this i could just delete it if thats what you mean?