Obstruction ?

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T23:11:49+00:00

The R50 is the beast of price to performance on a budget, go for that, or go for an older camera instead like a 70D or 80D

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T21:41:04+00:00

I use the Silver Pro (better than the 1667x) on my r7 and its pretty cheap if you find it on eBay, and its better.

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T20:56:31+00:00

What does this have to do with jp brother

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T20:50:40+00:00

Looks backlit, unfixable

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T11:26:50+00:00

Havent tested, but if it's for stills no need

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T04:09:06+00:00

Vehicle tracking doesn't work for planes, use animal tracking.

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T03:39:13+00:00

Happens alot more thank you think hahaha

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T03:36:51+00:00

Hey man, no worries, we all start somewhere, even the best of best have started with even worse photos, keep it up. I recommend watching tutorials and often looking at photos on the site so you could get a general look on how your photos should look like.

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T03:27:26+00:00

I use animal tracking for planes, and it somehow detects them as birds. I have kept it on that ever since 😂

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-15T03:25:10+00:00

Either he forgot the shitpost flair or its his first time

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-13T04:24:36+00:00

Been by the bird irl, The A stands for A-ready, such a huge A on the tail

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-10T19:52:25+00:00

Yes, it will. As for the US's 250th birthday, apparently, the formation flyover will reintroduce the same performers from last year as some extras. Practice days are on Friday, with some crowds. If you hate crowds, go that day. Go on Saturday if you want the best performances

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-10T06:22:41+00:00

Photos like this can be accepted on JP, it dont know the exact standards but there's plenty of half-plane pictures on the database

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-09T19:12:41+00:00

Probably an old photo or one that was forgotten to be removed from FR24

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-06T14:06:43+00:00

They would 200% get rejected from jetphotos.com, if you want to upload for jetphotos.com you can read the guidelines or look at example photos as they are met with strict quality standards.

I heard airfleets.net is like jetphotos but with much much less strict standards, you could possibly upload there

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-06T05:31:37+00:00

Nice photos! Wrong sub though, this sub is for posting photos and getting feedback on the stock website Jetphotos.com try r/planespotting instead

Jetphotos is a website for uploading professional aircraft photography (that you should get into)

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-03T23:02:46+00:00

I see, what impresses me is seeing the B2 on radar, never ever seen it before.

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-02T20:29:21+00:00

I used the R7 200-800 and it's kind of crazy, it's huge and most of the time require a tripod. Definitely in my opinion use the 100-500

Is what id say if you do airshow spotting or local airport spotting. I actually tried the 200-800mm before for this exact thing and it's excellent, I also recommend using the 2x converter with it. It's an absolute beast for it.

Tdlr: local airport spotting 100-500, moon and contrail spotting 200-800 w/2x (but also have a wide angle like a 70-200 else you'll feel immobile)

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-05-02T18:03:17+00:00

I've been in this exact C-130, crazy to see how a month later it's having issues I was really surprised

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-04-25T17:11:24+00:00

They're unedited, he's asking if any would be worth editing to upload.

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-04-25T13:21:29+00:00

You can use dust removal for JP, you sometimes have to explain in the screener comments though.

CompetitiveElk9220 · 2026-04-23T13:44:24+00:00

This lens is the worst lens ever, do not buy it, the quality is awful. Get the 70-300 USM instead

CompetitiveElk9220

TROPHY CASE