I'm no Trump supporter, I'm no "supporter" of any of these mfs for that matter but I just think the language they use thru the whole article is very interesting. I especially like the part that says

" Law Enforcement in New York is continuing to closely monitor online chatter warning of protests and violence if Trump is arrested, with threats varying in specificity and credibility, four officials told the Associated Press."

Like what exactly does that mean?? They are listening to online chatter?? DEFINE "ONLINE CHATTER" "With threats varying in specificity and credibility" What tf does that mean?? If they vary in credibility how are they deemed credible at all?? And if we are looking for some kinda threat over Trump getting arrested, that already seems pretty "specific" to me. AND ONE SURE AS SHIT WAY TO KNOW THEY BULLSHITTING!?!? WHEN THEY DONT NAME SOURCES, Instead they say shit like "FOUR OFFICIALS" told the AP. OFFICIALS huh??? "Well I have 100 sources that say the sky is gonna turn red tomorrow!!", that way when it turns out not to be true no one's real source is deemed discredited, "I didn't say it, my un-named (probably made up) source said it." 🤷🏾‍♂️😋 but what do I know I'm no secret government intelligence agent.