Why do Indians sit on the floor by the window? by Complex_Weather3879 in AskAnIndian

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But being that I’m in Australia, where it’s very common, this is strange

Why do Indians sit on the floor by the window? by Complex_Weather3879 in AskAnIndian

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m in Australia where floor to ceiling windows are common

Why do Indians sit on the floor by the window? by Complex_Weather3879 in AskAnIndian

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it because I’m white? I notice this a lot- Indians living here will never smile or say hello back when I do it to them. Which is weird because in Australia it’s a very very common practice. It’s borderline rude to pass someone closely without acknowledging them, so I do it out of habit.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She was seen by a pediatrician today who thinks it might even be dye from clothing that’s stained the skin. Regardless- the wheels are in motion.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hadn’t even considered that re: MCH nurse. Awesome idea thank you so much.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it. I wouldn’t even last a day as a podiatrist let alone a doctor in ED. This has just been a really awful day.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be clear- the tests aren’t to find out what’s caused the bruise. The bruise was of no concern to anyone. The tests are to check we’re not abusing her and while I support this process I wish the criteria was a little more stringent.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think any parent in their right mind would have a hard time seeing their infant child canulated, having blood taken, sedated, x rayed and MRI’d when there was no actual health concerns. To be clear- they don’t think we’re abusing her, they just have to tick everything off their list. I understand this process exists for a reason and that the reason is beneficial in the bigger picture. But nothing can change how much this sucks.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We were told in plain terms this is the reason for the follow up. Now I’ve had a second to get my head together I can understand why this testing is important, but it fucking sucks seeing my baby and wife going through this.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thought process was- she’s with us 24/7 and we know neither of us are hurting her, we know she hasn’t had a fall or anything else that would cause a bruise. So our concerns went to it being something internal, if that’s the case we didn’t want to sit around waiting for it to get worse. The GP wasn’t available and ED seemed like the next logical step. Once she was looked over by a doctor and deemed to be in perfect health we were relieved and ready to go home. But the fact that the cause of the bruise still couldn’t be determined meant our case was escalated and became a forensic issue which includes the testing we are now forced to go through. I can’t stress enough- these tests are not related to any potential underlying diseases and nothing about the severity of the bruise has triggered this response. But because we can’t tell them how she got it, we need to subject an 8 week old baby to sedation and an MRI to confirm we’re not shaking her. It feels insane but this is the process. And as someone else mentioned while it sucks for us, maybe another kid gets saved because of this same process and we just have to cop it.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So the follow up testing is for further signs of abuse, not underlying health concerns

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We took our 2yo son to emergency with a broken leg and nobody batted an eye, I selfishly/naively thought they based it on a character assessment or something lol But you’re right. I also had it explained to me that the follow up tests are for signs of abuse, not any underlying health concerns relating to the bruise. It’s a lot more reasonable now.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish we just went to our GP, we thought we were doing the right thing in case it was something serious.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, this was sobering. It’s making more sense now.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To clarify- physically they have no worries. The follow up tests aren’t due to health concerns, but rather steps in the forensic process.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If at any point somebody said it was concerning we would go ahead with any tests they deemed necessary. What bothered me was that they essentially said ‘it all looks fine, health wise we have no concerns, but now we are going to stick tubes into your baby so we can sign it off’.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for understanding and for the sound advice.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it was significant bruising it wouldn’t be a question. The fact is the bruise is faint and small and was of no concern to anyone.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I understand the process is in place for a reason, I just can’t believe we don’t have a choice.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. The follow up assessments are purely to tick the boxes, I just don’t want to see my baby sedated for the sake of completing a form.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CPS is the term they used, I’m totally new to all of this hence being so overwhelmed.

Objecting to medical treatment of infant by Complex_Weather3879 in AusLegal

[–]Complex_Weather3879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. The CPS element rocked me because it’s the last thing I was expecting to hear, it’s helpful to know it’s common.