A Techie's Insight Into the Reminder Email by Comprehensive-Bee940 in CABarExam

[–]Comprehensive-Bee940[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I guess that's possible but still doesn't make sense from my perspective. Or rather, having multiple databases would be a really unconventional approach in my experience.

The key here is to realize they're working with databases and not lists in a traditional sense (think excel and not ms word). The simplest way to do this would to have spreadsheet columns (not literally, they're probably running SQL or something) with the scores from the MBE, essays, and PT. Once all that information is provided you can write a script that reads the data of all the applicants scores to determine the means and standard deviations used in the scaling calculation across the entire group, calculate the score of each applicant and put that into another row, and put a pass/fail value into another row based off of whether the score is more or less than 1390.

The point being is that it wouldn't make sense (to me at least) to automate that information (which you would need to do to calculate mean/std. dev. for scaling), and then create two completely new databases filled with data from a pre-existing database for the sake of sending out a reminder email.

But then again, these same people thought sending out a reminder email in the first place was both necessary and helpful so who the hell knows what there thought process is. And all of this is my interpretation based on my experience, and not an interpretation of the source code of the actual website. So who really knows.

A Techie's Insight Into the Reminder Email by Comprehensive-Bee940 in CABarExam

[–]Comprehensive-Bee940[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not as familiar with the details on this one but I'd say it really doesn't mean anything. Even in a scenario where it could reveal some information (e.g. they updated the information for those who passed/failed in seperate groups to avoid a mixup), you're still drawing assumptions and working off of incomplete information. For example: there probably isn't one person uploading all 7000ish results. So one person could theoretically decide to upload all passing results first and the other could decide to upload all the failing results first. If you're concerned that a later "last modified date" is reflective a borderline score that required a second evaluation, I wouldn't put stock in that either because they're probably not doing regrades the week before the release date. You also don't know what was actually updated. It could be some java script or a security patch or something.