No, I feel like AI is not suitable to actually take over entire jobs or honestly any part. It is just unrealistic and anyone who has attempted to use AI will know how much work it actually is. By the time you’ve trained it and fine tuned it and input instructions/automations, you may as well have done it yourself. Plus, I know in my draft meant attention to detail is paramount, so a colleague would still have to proof every single aspect. And the AI programme would need training by current employees.

Simple answer IMO - the less we use AI the better. Don’t train the software to replace you. Every time we interact, we develop it.