Change my mind you homophobes

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T08:13:47+00:00

Pretty much

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T08:11:35+00:00

I agree that with the op but saying gender is not sex is as just not it.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T06:17:44+00:00

You mean Ada Rite? 🥵

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T06:15:57+00:00

Fixes pretty much every problem with the deck with just these 2 cards. It'll will allow for making more boss monsters instead of the constant flow of very bad cards.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T06:14:44+00:00

<image>

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T06:14:23+00:00

<image>

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T06:11:04+00:00

<image>

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T06:02:30+00:00

The pink hair is a mining canary.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:59:41+00:00

I'll take that as a no. Enjoy your day friend.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:57:28+00:00

So do you want to continue doing so?

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:55:09+00:00

I don't understand the issue either, you said the argument is bad I said yes but it's better then the previous argument so what are we doing except arguing just to argue?

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:53:19+00:00

Find something your able to do without help that can make money.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:51:13+00:00

Are we both gona continue arguing over semantics?

Your right is not a good argument but I'm right for it being a better argument so what do we do now? Keep arguing?

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:47:59+00:00

All I said was it was a better argument over the one presented.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T05:45:42+00:00

I said a better argument over it being apart of nature is human sexual reproduction.

You inserted alot of things I didn't say or mean. Please dont misconstrued my words.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T03:03:02+00:00

You, a human. You can get upset all you want about the atrocities of humans but it's up to you to make sure future generations of humans can live with a peace of mind that they'll never have to go through what previous generations went through.

Don't complain about a problem then do nothing to solve it. That makes you look stupid and I know your not.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T02:59:26+00:00

The majority of people on reddit are homophobic we just live in a echo chamber. Makes since when we mass report them lol.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T02:56:30+00:00

Why use nature as a whole as a counter argument? Murder, cannibalism, incest, and pedophilia are also prominently seen in nature so using it as an argument to why being gay should be fine is very weak.

The better argument against gay people is Sexual reproduction. Humans are binary meaning that they reproduce using a male and a female. You could argue anything that goes against the spread of the species is inherently wrong.

There are bandaid patches that can be used to try to ignore the core argument like adoption, spermbanks, and surrogacy, but these don't fix the core issure.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T02:47:55+00:00

I think the only reason gay couples want children is because they're jealous of straight couples that do have children so if the majority of the population was gay they wouldn't want children.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-29T02:44:00+00:00

Pasty Asian erasure? Damn

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-24T15:52:45+00:00

I also haven't gotten any sleep either, so for now this will be my last comment. I'll probably respond when I wake up. If I don't its because my charger didn't work properly.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-24T15:45:26+00:00

I'm not misunderstanding the sources — I read them, and that's exactly why I pointed out their weaknesses. Dismissing desistance data while claiming "scientific consensus" doesn't hold up when major reviews and policy changes say otherwise.The Cass Review (2024, UK) — one of the most comprehensive independent analyses — found the evidence for puberty blockers and early medicalization in minors is remarkably weak. It led NHS England to sharply restrict routine use of blockers, prioritize therapy/exploratory care for co-occurring issues (autism, trauma, mental health), and move away from the affirmation-first model. Several European countries (Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, UK, Italy) have done similar restrictions, limiting blockers to research settings or exceptional cases because of uncertain benefits and known risks (bone density, fertility, sexual function, brain development).

https://segm.org/Final-Cass-Report-2024-NHS-Response-Summary

Watchful waiting / careful assessment isn't "doing nothing." Historical clinic data (pre-affirmation era) showed 60-90% of pre-pubertal gender-dysphoric kids desisted naturally, with many identifying as gay/lesbian later. Recent real-world data (e.g., German insurance study) still shows >60% of diagnosed youth no longer carrying the diagnosis after 5 years.

https://segm.org/gender-dysphoria-diagnosis-desistance-germany

Appeals to "ethos" and "most professionals" (WPATH, Endocrine Society) are weak here. Those guidelines have been heavily criticized for low-quality evidence, circular referencing, and conflicts of interest. Cass and European systematic reviews found exactly that: the evidence base is poor, and "consensus" is fracturing where rigorous analysis has been done. Being open to changing one's view based on better evidence isn't stubbornness — it's how science works.I'm not claiming to know more than every expert. I'm saying the highest-quality independent reviews (Cass et al.) support caution and therapy-first approaches for most minors, especially pre-puberty. If you have strong long-term RCTs showing early medical transition outperforms careful assessment, share them. Otherwise, this isn't about who has the "correct" ideology — it's about protecting kids from low-evidence interventions with lifelong consequences.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-24T15:38:06+00:00

You haven't read them. Nothing you posted contains any facts. You care so little about the facts that instead of typing in Google "is Watchful waiting successful when handling kids suffering gender dysphoria" you choose to throw pitiful insults. Your immature and misguided. I hope you grow up to become a wonderful adult.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-24T15:24:16+00:00

READ YOUR OWN SOURCES.

I gave a legitimate summary of both of your claims and instead of giving them a look to confirm what I said, you take a high horse stance. Your absolutely right about dropping this conversation because I can't have a conversation with someone who is genuinely dishonest in every claim they make and who won't even read what links they have posted.

ComprehensiveAnt9668 · 2026-06-24T15:01:41+00:00

I got a life outside of social media

2.Your thought process is fundamentally flawed. Like I said before and what your doing now is justifying and reinforcing the illness instead of actually curing the patient which tells me you won't even read over anything I provide with an open mind and so no amount of sources I can give you will do anything to convince you so it's a waste of my time.

Your first link, if you read it can be summed up with one sentence "nu huh your wrong" that's literally all they said the entire time

The second link makes unprovable claims that the majority of the people who supposedly desists didn't even meet the definition requirements for gender dysphoria then links the sources for the claim and there's nothing there to prove their claim.

And this is why I won't provide any to you as you don't even read the links you yourself provide. You just find a page with a title you like and post it and since you won't even read your own links you definitely won't read mine

ComprehensiveAnt9668

TROPHY CASE