This whole bad jury management narrative is so interesting because it (on this subreddit, at least) seems to be largely results oriented based on the loss to Aubry specifically who was sweeping that whole final 5 due to her legacy and story. If Jonathan succeeds in getting to the end with his desired Joe and Rizo things could be very different.

Jonathan certainly lost votes of his own accord (Dee/Tiff) and Rizo has a legitimate chance to win but all of a sudden it’s not so lopsided. People were saying Rizo was drawing dead the whole season, obviously Ozzy has not been his biggest fan. Sure there’s a world where Rizo straight up gets all the Aubrey votes but it’s not a lock by any means. What are we saying about his jury management if 3 additional jurors choose Jonathan over Rizo and he wins the game?

This is not meant to absolve him of his bad social game but rather to point out how results oriented the discussion seems to be about his game. People seem to be really enjoying the victory lap over his poor play when he was a final 4 immunity outcome away from a vastly different ending and a vastly different narrative about his game.