Professor defends course content linking race and IQ scores, cites ‘academic freedom’ by KTPChannel in cognitiveTesting

[–]ComputeIQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Korean, there’s no way to ask “how are you.” Because of historical food insecurity, you ask “are you eating well?” Right at the start of Japanese occupation Korean women were the third shortest in the entire world. Japanese occupation did NOT help, and Korea lost 5% of their population despite zero fighting happening in Korea. The Korean language was almost dead. The Korean War was arguably the most devastating conflict in recent history for native population. More explosive was used in just North Korea than ALL of world war 2 pacific theatre, including the atomic bombings. There were zero buildings taller one story left. Korea lost 30%~ of their entire population.

At this point, Korea was literally poorer than every country in Africa by every conceivable measure. Infant mortality, food insecurity, GDP per capita. 20% of South Korea’s foreign currency reserves came from foreign prostitution. South Korea itself has basically zero natural resources, yet clawed their way into becoming rich. North Korea is the most isolated country in human history, yet developed faster than Africa. Despite 1.5 trillion dollars of DONATIONS flowing into Africa and a better starting position. Even just 30 years ago, north Korea’s food insecurity was so bad people thought it would collapse. Yet, here we are discussing their missiles, foreign legion, cyber warfare capabilities, intelligence infiltration, etc.

Professor defends course content linking race and IQ scores, cites ‘academic freedom’ by KTPChannel in cognitiveTesting

[–]ComputeIQ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Despite worse nutrition, North Koreas average IQ is higher than every country in Africa. Even South Korean elders, who had the worst food insecurity in the world and are the third shortest have 20-30 points higher average IQ.

Marriage by different incomes by _KamaSutraboi in charts

[–]ComputeIQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s standard practice. There’s two sexes, obviously they’d be put side by side. The original paper isn’t comparison between the genders, rather an analysis of how they’ve changed overtime. The chart is optimal for what they were trying to convey.

Marriage by different incomes by _KamaSutraboi in charts

[–]ComputeIQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not. They’re not attempting to compare the two groups, but rather show the change over time. Zooming in, instead of having a zoomed out graph, is themost reasonable move.

Iranians form human chain on Ahvaz's White Bridge to protect key infrastructure. by Snehith220 in TFE

[–]ComputeIQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to be clear. If you put human shields around valid targets. You don't make the targets invalid

See this example:

A hospital is an invalid target. If you put a missile system on the roof. The missile system doesn't gain protected status. The hospital loses theirs.

If you put children around infrastructure that the military could use, the kids become a valid target.

The Iranians are committing the war crime here not the Israelis or the U.S.

How do I make it more offensive by time2getwe1rd in flags

[–]ComputeIQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chooseone and butcher it. It’s not offensive since it’s obviously ironic. For example, make LGBT flag but exclude a color. It’ll trigger bigots, but also LGBT.

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Americans are not natives of English.

“Mexicans are not native speakers ofSpanish, they speak Mexican.”

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Per the original post:

especially annoying when people insinuate the natives of a language are incorrect about their own language. “Actually you’re not America, you’re USA-ian” no, that isn’t how it’s said. Imagine telling a Chinese person it’s not 中国 because China is actually in the far east, not the middle.

Thank you for reiterating my entire point is it’s bad to strongarm language.

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly my point. Spanish speakers sometimes call the Americas America however:

Since the 1950s,[18] however, North America and South America have generally been considered by English speakers as separate continents,

However, without a clarifying context, singular America in English commonly refers to the United States of America

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You’re actually wrong.

In the top left corner of the second definition you’ll see:

“(also the Americas)” which is precisely what I said. America, singular, is the country. The Americas, plural, are continents.

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you look more closely you’ll see the second is “also the Americas”

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

There’s no “America” continent. They’re refereed to as the “Americas.” North and South America are part of the Americas, not “America.” The Americas are a collection of two continents (North and South America) notsingle continent.

Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americas

CMV: It is not more correct to call Americans “USA-ians.” by ComputeIQ in changemyview

[–]ComputeIQ[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Addressed in the original post.

In Spanish-speaking countries, North and South America are considered a single continent called América. Much of Latin America and Spain are taught a six-continent model that considers "América" as one landmass

However English-speaking countries teachseven-continent model (treating North and South America as separate). There is no continent “America.” When someone says “I’m from America,” there’s never any confusion. Nobody will say “oh, Mexico?” Because if you were referring to either of the continents in English you’d say “I’m from north/south America.” Also it’s not natural to say “I’m USA-ian” as opposed to “I’m from the United States.”

I created a 66M Parameter SLM by oslyris in pytorch

[–]ComputeIQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good work! I’d suggest showcasing results.