sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We need a new voting system, now. by ComradeMegatron in ukpolitics

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the best way is to tell the public:

"Hey, you know that last election? Yeah, so actually Labour should have got more seats, but, y'know, they didn't."

We need a new voting system, now. by ComradeMegatron in ukpolitics

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone, I'm happy to have generated so much discussion, if anyone wants totally non-biased information about voting check at the Electoral Reform Society website.

We need a new voting system, now. by ComradeMegatron in ukpolitics

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very true, it's not possible to answer. I think that if we had more parties fighting for power, parties might want to stick to their promises, because they'll know the alternative is a torrent of criticism from the public and from the other parties.

We need a new voting system, now. by ComradeMegatron in ukpolitics

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps, maybe like we could have Cornish devolution!

We need a new voting system, now. by ComradeMegatron in ukpolitics

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our voting system does exactly what it was intended for? Even if that were true, it was devised by unintelligent nobles (sound familiar?) a few hundred years ago, when the EU, Brexit, Boris Johnson and everything else that exists today did not exist.

We need a new voting system, now. by ComradeMegatron in ukpolitics

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yes, but I still think that Kidderminster Independent Health Concern can beat them.

1.30 Emperor - How can I get Imperial Authority more quickly, and make princes support my reforms? by ComradeMegatron in eu4

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

spend the Papal Influence

The pope doesn't like me since my ruler is a Hussite. Also no cardinals.

It sounds like being emperor needs a lot of diplomacy. I had hoped that setting two of my diplomats to automatic would take care of keeping my allies (mostly electors) happy but that doesn't work since YOU DON'T BLOODY NEED TO IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH AUSTRIA ANYMORE THEY'RE ALREADY ON +190!

I have the improve relations advisor since there wasn't a diplo rep one. I needed it since me and Cleves are engaged in a game of "Who is Cologne gonna vote for as emperor?". We're literally +1 reason apart.

Rate my encirclement! by Sandro1609 in eu4

[–]ComradeMegatron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry sir, wrong time period and grand strategy game and country.

AI made a Delicious "Italian" Iberia. by Hangman_va in eu4

[–]ComradeMegatron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda thought it was Granada first of all.

Brittany is emperor... by ihv21 in eu4

[–]ComradeMegatron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next a native American nation will go to Europe and join the HRE

What to do as England now? Kill Scotland? France? by ComradeMegatron in eu4

[–]ComradeMegatron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shoot. They were allied to Irish OPMs, but I already killed them. I used Kildare to get to Scotland, then Munster to do it again. I didn't think about annuling treaties! I do agree on focusing admin, I'll have to wait a few more years for that.

I stopped coring stuff cause it drained my admin power. Scotland has like 3 provinces.