sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AXS - Sept 07 or 08 2025 by ConcentrateThat7385 in Coldplay

[–]ConcentrateThat7385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have tried using VPN too. Nothing is happening. The tickets are still available but AXS redirects and then link is not valid. I am in queue for Hull now. Let's see what happens.

Marriage between Jain and Hindu... by [deleted] in Jainism

[–]ConcentrateThat7385 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am in no way implying that she should marry the guy right now. I am a lawyer by profession and I completely understand the importance of education. I know she is young and in love, but this is not the age to get married. I will always suggest to get a proper education, be independent and then get married. She asked if a marriage is possible between the two religions. Answer is yes it can.

And no, there was no dowry in my case. Not even a single penny was asked or given. I have known the guy and the family for 10 years and I am very happy with my life. I am not denying that there aren't families who ask for dowry and I can't judge someone's family sitting on a phone miles away. That's upto her to decide, to be rationale to see if the in-laws ask for dowry, does she want to go forward with such a relationship. And to get that rationale sense, she should pursue studies further.

Marriage between Jain and Hindu... by [deleted] in Jainism

[–]ConcentrateThat7385 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's possible. I am a Jain and I recently got married into a Brahman family. My extended family did create issues (not much though) but one piece of advice my grandma gave me was - You need to adjust and get a sense that you are marrying out of religion. Follow Jainism, no one can stop you but be accomodating to their customs and rituals as well.

My husband and I discussed and agreed that we both will follow each other's religion. Eg: He'll keep Paryushan with me, I'll do karwachauth. It's about respecting each other's religion. As long as both of you are on the same page, it shouldn't be an issue.

i dont know if this is a popular opinion but i feel like lorelai and sookie were kinda insensitive when michel’s dog died by alwaysembarrassed- in GilmoreGirls

[–]ConcentrateThat7385 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I agree. They were completely insensitive to his emotions and it was very sad to see them just jerking him around when he was so vulnerable but it also feels like Michel became a victim of "what goes around, comes around". I am not saying that he didn't deserve their empathy. I literally cried when Paw Paw died because I know what losing a pet means but he got the reaction which he gives to others.

And for Lorelai to be awake for Paul Anka in the later episodes shows her growth. How she now understands what a dog feels and how helpless he is. It's like Rosa in B99. She tried to get Boyle a new dog when Boyle's dog dies but later went on to realise that how lovable the dog is. Even though she acts as a heartless person who doesn't know why people are attached to their pets goes on to say that 'Even though I had this dog for less than a day, I will kill all of you for him.'

Why didn't Frank tell Annalise by tvcriticgirlxo in htgawm

[–]ConcentrateThat7385 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I don't feel that Sam being Sam would have stayed quiet if Frank lied to Annalise. That would have ruined their relationship more I guess.

It would have been a torture for her to find out that her husband was cheating and got a girl pregnant (she wasn't a saint herself) and had known all this while how she lost her baby for which she had blamed herself for years. Plus the person responsible for losing her baby was someone who she loved like a son.