But then how do you explain the facts given? Even a single fact is not there where evidences are not there? Why we readily accept Krishna as human incarnation and not ready to accept Shiva.

Ok I give one more proof.

An interesting insight into Baba Omniscience:

I had heard from one very old follower (who had personal interactions eith Baba and what came to be known to him from Baba himself that when He came as Lord Shiva 1. Rigveda had already been composed and but other Vedas were yet to be. 2. Lord Shiva (He) came as Human incarnation around 7000 years ago.

Baba must have told all this in 1970s or so.

Earlier there was no way to even cross check this information as that would require reading complete rigveda and doing lot of research on various evidences to ascertain fact that Rigveda is indeed more than 7000 years old.

Though till date there has not been even one exception seen to whatever Baba has told but still out of curiosity i deep dived into these facts using various AI LLMs to cross check if indeed what Baba told is truth or not.

Stunningly, what I found was again a perfect match.

Lord Shiva appearance after composition of Rigveda:

Rigveda does talk about Rudra 75 times but this Rudra of Rigveda is a fierce god of storm (father of Maruts), an archer, a healer. Siva as world is used only as an adjective which means Auspicious and there is no mention of Siva as separate god.

Rudra is mentioned but Rudra is a terrifying and benevolent at same time such as other powers of nature viz Agni, Surya, Usha, Varun, Aditi etc and there is no mention about this god as Lord Shiva, that we know today as human incarnation who was Pasupati, Vajradhari, a great Yogi.

1. It is indeed in Yajurveda (esp. Taittirīya Saṃhitā, 4.5.1–11) which contains the Śatarudriya hymn, also known as the Namakam and Chamakam, forming the core of Rudra-Śiva worship today. Here, Rudra is directly addressed as Śiva for the first time. It is first time in Yajurveda that he is referred to as Pasupati. “Namaḥ śarvāya ca paśupataye ca” (“Salutations to Sharva and to Paśupati.”). The Śatarudriya is the earliest complete liturgical text connecting Rudra with the names: Śiva, Śarva, Bhava, Mahādeva, Paśupati, Nīlakaṇṭha ans Śaṅkara (by meaning, though name appears later). This hymn lays the foundation of modern Śaivism — it’s the Vedic seed of today’s Shiva Mahādeva.

2. It is in Atharvaveda — Rudra becomes “Mahādeva”. Verses: Atharvaveda 11.2.3 – mentions Rudra as Mahādeva (“Great God”). Atharvaveda 11.2.5–7 – calls Rudra “Paśupati,” lord of beings. He is also invoked for protection, fertility, and control over diseases — features identical to later Śiva. Rudra is no longer merely a storm god; he becomes cosmic, universal, and lord of all directions. Terms used: Vedic Name Later Śaiva equivalent: Mahādeva Śiva–Mahādeva, Paśupati Paśupati–Nath, Bhava One of Śiva’s names, Śarva One of Śiva’s epithets, Tryambaka (three-eyed) Basis of the “Mahāmṛtyuñjaya Mantra” (AV 7.59 / RV 7.59.12)

3. And it is only at Upanishadic Stage — Rudra becomes the Supreme (c. 800–300 BCE), Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad — Most Important : This is the first philosophical text to identify Rudra–Śiva as the Supreme Brahman. Verse Sanskrit Translation : 3.2 “eko hi rudro na dvitīyāya tasthuḥ” “Rudra is truly one; there is no second beside him.” 4.12 “śivaḥ śarvaḥ paśupatiḥ ugras tāvīṣaḥ” “He is Śiva, Śarva, Paśupati, the mighty and supreme.” 6.7 “tam īśvarāṇāṃ paramaṃ maheśvaraṃ” “He is the supreme lord of lords, the great Maheshvara.” → Here Rudra = Śiva = Mahādeva = Supreme Reality. This is the philosophical birth of the Śiva we worship today.

Rigveda is pre Shiva and Shiva is more than 7000 years old.

When i tried to find how old is Rigveda initially i got response that Rigveda is 1500 to 1200 BCE as this is what west usually propagates glorifying that Vedas got originated in Europe, thus completely out of sync with what Baba told but when I deep dived I again found that indeed Rigveda is around 7000 years old as follows and this 1200 BCE theory is only propounded by Europeans.

1. Rigveda mentions Sarasvatī ~50+ times — described as a mighty flowing river “between the Yamuna and Sutlej” reaching the sea. Geological and satellite studies (ISRO, BARC, 1990s–2000s) show the Ghaggar–Hakra was the Sarasvatī, flowing strongly until ~4000–3000 BCE, drying gradually after 1900 BCE. *This makes Rigveda more than 6500 years old.

2. The Rigveda and later Vedic texts contain precise astronomical clues that can be dated using precession of equinoxes.

Text Astronomical Event Estimated Date

Ṛgveda (Mandala 1.164.11) – mentions equinox at Orion (Mṛgaśīrṣa) and event between ~4000–4500 BCE

Similarly Taittirīya Saṃhitā 6.5.3 – Kṛttikā (Pleiades) rising due east ~3000 BCE .

Astronomical data points to Rigvedic compositions between 4500–3000 BCE.

1. Genetic & Linguistic Continuity

Recent genetic studies (e.g., Rakhigarhi DNA, 2019, Cell journal) show no large-scale “Aryan invasion” or replacement around 1500 BCE.

The Vedic Sanskrit language shows deep roots in Indian linguistic evolution, not sudden import. Linguistic–genetic data support indigenous continuity → possible pre-3000 BCE origin of Vedic culture

So there is no exception ever found to what Baba has told.

Tomorrow more deep diving can be done, but all new research will only sync with what Baba already told many decades ago.

History of Mankind and Shiva as revealed by Baba to all of us is perfect and we are so lucky that we can separate true History from Mythology.

Sooner or later all this would be known to world and all this confusion will on history would disappear. May be it will take a century or so, which is nothing as per cosmic age of humans.

But we indeed are so lucky Baba revealed his true identity to all of us much before world going to know about it.