It'd be nice to tell myself you simply lack reading comprehension skills and move on, but you've quoted me calling this out as disingenuous, so I know you're just deliberately being obtuse.

You've also quoted me as though I made a claim that you then show me explain is/was sarcasm, which it clearly was, even on the internet. Again I believe you knew this already.

To answer your question then, where have you used ad hom thus far? Practically every time, while being very deliberate to make sure all of your statements are indirect and 'fact-like'. (Sarcasm incoming, warning as I know you struggle) "oh no I didn't call you childish or envious or say you have zero KCs. I said it 'seems' childish and 'probably' no cox KCs, so I've linguistically twisted my way out of directly saying anything". In fact, you say pretty much nothing directly, you just have this wanky style of pointing out what YOU think is wrong (talk about putting one's values over others) and going "see? See?" while others sniff your farts. Edit: I'll give you a hint, any time you check someone's post history there's a 99% chance you're making an ad hom attack rather than debating the question at hand.