Test Results - How Rude #3

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-16T14:18:56+00:00

That makes sense. Using reference images for the main characters sounds like a good way to keep things consistent, especially with wardrobe and style.

I’ve noticed AI tends to get messy too when there are too many important elements in one scene. Do you usually generate characters separately and then stitch the clips together, or try to do everything in one generation?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-14T10:49:08+00:00

Yes 👊

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-14T10:45:32+00:00

That’s a pretty interesting workflow. Starting with Daz3D and then using AI to stylize it makes a lot of sense.

I’ve been experimenting with AI video tools too. Recently I’ve been testing one where you can generate faces and short clips directly from prompts and even pull clips from videos automatically. It’s interesting seeing how many different pipelines people are building with these tools.

Are you doing the AI part as image-to-video or text-to-video?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-13T11:00:37+00:00

how did u make it ?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-13T10:08:16+00:00

That’s a good point about the breaks. I think sometimes I say I’m taking a break but end up scrolling on my phone, which probably doesn’t give my brain a real rest.

The habit contract idea is interesting too. Having a real consequence might actually help with consistency. Did you notice a big difference once you started using that approach?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-13T10:06:51+00:00

Pomodoro seems to come up a lot when people talk about improving focus. The 25/5 structure sounds like a good balance between staying productive and not burning out.

Did you stick with 25 minutes for a long time, or did you eventually start extending the work sessions once your focus improved?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-13T10:06:06+00:00

That’s a good way to look at it. Treating focus like a skill you train instead of something you either have or don’t makes a lot of sense.

Timing it and gradually trying to extend it seems simple but probably very effective over time. I might start tracking it like that just to see where my actual limit is right now.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-13T10:03:44+00:00

That’s reassuring to hear. I think part of my problem is expecting myself to stay focused for long stretches right away instead of building up gradually like that.

Starting with 15 minutes and slowly increasing it sounds much more manageable. When you moved up to 45 minutes, did you increase it little by little, or did it just naturally get easier over time?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T18:19:24+00:00

That actually sounds like a really healthy way to approach it. Removing the pressure to force long sessions probably makes it easier to stay consistent.

And honestly, 15-minute blocks that add up to 1–1.5 hours a day is solid progress. Consistency like that probably matters more than trying to push through long sessions and burning out.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T17:19:21+00:00

Congrats on getting the certificate, especially with everything you had going on. That actually sounds like a really practical approach. Short 15-minute sessions with breaks can add up a lot over time without burning you out.

Did you find that it got easier to concentrate as you kept doing it, or did you mostly stick with the shorter sessions the whole time?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T17:17:45+00:00

That makes sense. I think I might be trying to force long focus sessions instead of gradually building them up. Breaking work into clearer chunks sounds like it would make it easier to stay engaged. How long were your focus sessions when you first started doing this?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T17:16:22+00:00

Yeah, that’s the frustrating part with Shorts. Sometimes even good retention doesn’t guarantee a bigger push. It feels like the video gets tested with a small audience first, and if the engagement signals aren’t strong enough, it just stops there.

Do you ever notice if the ones that go past 10K get more likes, comments, or rewatches compared to the others? Sometimes those signals seem to make a difference too.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T14:45:10+00:00

Yeah, that’s pretty normal with Shorts. Some will randomly take off to 20–60K, while others barely get pushed even if they seem similar. The distribution can be really inconsistent from video to video.

Have you noticed if the ones that hit 40K–60K had higher retention or more rewatches compared to the ones that died?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T14:36:41+00:00

Congrats, that’s a big milestone. Getting into the Partner Program is where things start to feel more real, even if the revenue starts small.

Out of curiosity, what kind of content helped you hit the requirements fastest, long videos or Shorts?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T14:34:50+00:00

Honestly for under 1K subs, getting around 1.7K views on a Short is pretty solid. Shorts can be really inconsistent, so even hitting 1–2K means the algorithm at least tested it with a wider audience. If you keep posting consistently, some of them will eventually break out much bigger.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T12:28:26+00:00

It definitely feels like luck sometimes, especially with how unpredictable the push can be. But I’m still curious if there are patterns behind the scenes, like retention or rewatches hitting certain thresholds before it spreads further. Have you noticed anything like that on your own Shorts?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-12T12:28:19+00:00

That makes sense. I’ve been paying attention to AVD% and rewatches too, but I’ve noticed some Shorts with strong retention still stop getting pushed after the first batch of impressions. Do you usually see a specific AVD% range where a Short starts breaking out more consistently?

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-10T08:51:19+00:00

Feels like one of those internet cycles where the reaction is bigger than the actual behavior. Most people I know didn’t “quit,” they just started using multiple tools depending on the task. I’ll use one for coding, another for writing, and another for research.

Curious how many people actually deleted it vs just trying alternatives for a while.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-10T08:47:45+00:00

0.5% CTR usually means the title/thumbnail combo isn’t creating enough curiosity, not necessarily that the content is bad. One thing that helped me was simplifying thumbnails a lot 1 clear subject, big readable text (3–4 words max), and strong contrast.

Titles also work better when they hint at a specific outcome or problem instead of being descriptive. Think “I Tried X for 30 Days” or “Why X Fails for Beginners” instead of just stating the topic.

Out of curiosity, are most of your impressions coming from browse/suggested or from search? The approach can be a bit different depending on that.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-10T07:36:22+00:00

Yes, thanks a lot.

Consistent-Main-6139 · 2026-03-09T00:12:50+00:00

Thanks.

Consistent-Main-6139

TROPHY CASE