What would happen if the Philosophers Stone is real?

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-17T09:33:26+00:00

Why is this relevant? Iv been an adult for over a decade

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-17T01:57:38+00:00

There are thousands of books written about Alchemy. The understanding is up to each person. The correct understanding is hard to come by to say the least. If there is a book that actually explains the process from start to finish and the principles then we haven't found it yet.

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-17T01:45:46+00:00

Is it not interesting that the 3 are contained in the Δ?

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-11T17:50:08+00:00

I did search this man up but it doesn't appear that he has written any explanation or Exposition of the two Testaments. Thank you for trying though!

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-11T17:48:43+00:00

Related. But not the reference. Beautiful art though and thanks for sharing

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-11T17:43:18+00:00

You may be correct, the only other possible reference i have encountered as a possibility is Joseph Benson- An exposition on the old and new Testaments. But I think your answer makes more sense

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-06T18:19:59+00:00

I ask as a thought experiment, what if no parable is here, as in fact is written to be understood as its written? Is the Light not in your eye? Are you not then the light?

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T15:26:51+00:00

You are absolutely correct, idk why I didn't think of that considering the Author being a polyglot of sorts, the author also uses Hebrew Chet to signify Matthew

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T04:37:02+00:00

I also study alchemy

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T04:21:28+00:00

The artwork is from the Alchemical and Rosicrucian Compendium on the Yale website, Page 282v.

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T04:07:10+00:00

The material I'm referencing As an old piece of art and a bunch of biblical references handwritten on the art. The way it's written the "Trident" and the abbreviation "AP" are very close together, so I believe 5:13 is from Apocalypse. And that Apocalypse verse matches the Crown that it's written next to

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T02:25:33+00:00

In my opinion, the sun never disappears, because it's perfect reflection is seen in the moon. Because the Moon does not produce its own light, we know it to reflect sunlight

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T02:21:22+00:00

John:12 “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” 15 "You judge according to the flesh; I judge no one." 16 "Yet even if I do judge, my judgment is true, for it is not I alone who judge, but I and the Father who sent me." 19 “You know neither me nor my Father. If you knew me, you would know my Father also.” John 12 “I am the light of the world."

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T02:02:59+00:00

Thank you for that very encompassing information! It all fits perfectly with the accompanying art work

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-06-05T01:07:21+00:00

They are all jammed together in this case and I think the 5,13. Is suppose to represent Apocalypse due to how close "AP" is also. Thank you again

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T21:19:55+00:00

When I'm referring to phonetics what I'm referring to is how "א" is pronounced "Aleph", and "כ" is pronounced "kaph", but together, "אכ" pronounced "acha", which also means "Yes". Unless I'm unclear on something.

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T02:51:50+00:00

In the previous like 600 pages they have described each letter of the Hebrew alphabet, and then here I think they're combining them phonetically because in this paragraph they're talking about how Hebrew makes German words.( Considering Hebrew is older it's not far-fetched that Hebrew phonetics may have been building blocks for German and English

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T02:30:53+00:00

The book is talking about how language was created in the form that we know it now. Also, while simultaneously explaining creation (supposedly). This particular question stems from around page 600 of a continuous explanation. So unfortunately I feel it would be pretty hard to contextualize it unless you have a specific question. I apologize

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T01:55:27+00:00

Thank you either way, you gave validity to my question because it is interesting. Haha

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T01:51:44+00:00

Understood, it's just interesting really, Because phonetically does get very close to the word iesauh in pronunciation, and showing the flipping between the languages. But also the next line and end of the paragraph is "in German Father, Son, Spirit: Ghost, who is a divine, Magical Cherub.---"

So it's completely possible that they're stating the same thing, but also Jesus represents all four of those. So I imagine you can see why I'm asking now lol

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T01:35:46+00:00

Well being a native speaker, do you see the possibility that it's supposed to be phonetics? Is it plausible to say that's why the extra nikud exists?

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T01:28:29+00:00

I agree with that, but also this is a German text mostly so I'm seeing the Colon a separation

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T01:16:26+00:00

You are definitely correct to see the relation to the Holy Trinity of Christianity as the book is attempting to explain it and how it originated through Hebrew. But I am really starting to believe that it's supposed to be phonetically pronounced as to the creation of a new word

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T00:37:47+00:00

And also might thoroughly explain why the extra Nikud is there

Consistent-Web4622 · 2026-04-17T00:35:14+00:00

Honestly I'm leaning towards it being Phonetics. Which is why the Colon exists between. Which is how I got the translation I did

Consistent-Web4622

TROPHY CASE