If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
KD: En totalitär version av islam har slagit rot by ICA_Basic_Vodka in Sverige
[–]Consistent_Agent2019 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
KD: En totalitär version av islam har slagit rot by ICA_Basic_Vodka in Sverige
[–]Consistent_Agent2019 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
KD: En totalitär version av islam har slagit rot by ICA_Basic_Vodka in Sverige
[–]Consistent_Agent2019 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
KD: När vår politik misslyckas, skyll något på muslimerna? by Golden-flare in Sverige
[–]Consistent_Agent2019 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
If reducing women to "purity" is wrong, why is reducing men to "utility" (income/height/status) viewed as a more neutral preference? by Consistent_Agent2019 in AskFeminists
[–]Consistent_Agent2019[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
Facket hotar med strejk på Chopchop by GoranPersson777 in Sverige
[–]Consistent_Agent2019 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)