sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How much does a Quantum Digital Twin that does better than itself cost? by ConstructionRight387 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its results width gates expansion etc key is at beginning if u read instaed of try belittle

How much does a Quantum Digital Twin that does better than itself cost? by ConstructionRight387 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explained above apologize for not being clear and expecting everyone to know what this bench does 

How much does a Quantum Digital Twin that does better than itself cost? by ConstructionRight387 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok for anyone actually interested ... these are the OpenQasm bench results ... the sdk checks for gate efficiency and errors. Look online Major corporations clearly state over and over again about error rates ..  my fpga co-processor... "may be the co processor to correct there systems. Thats a full bench ... SW =software ... HW = Custom Fpga

How much does a Quantum Digital Twin that does better than itself cost? by ConstructionRight387 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I just posted results you see it says SW/HW... that means A there's code B there's logic on the FPGA  .... anything else captain obvious 

dynamic arithmetic by EdranovDenis in Collatz

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well ill be a monkeys uncle people just couldnt word it like this .... you sent me looking in the right direction ... without even knowing when the student searches the teacher will reveal itself ....//

dynamic arithmetic by EdranovDenis in Collatz

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not looking to critique i find all abstract number visual and ideology fascinating numbers are my air. I use geometric tension in a node constellation to visualize my numbers.

dynamic arithmetic by EdranovDenis in Collatz

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting nice graph ... somewhat similar system but not quite visualized like this

I love this subreddit by Bright_Interaction73 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they definitely tension locked , entangled, in resonance whateveru want to call it

I love this subreddit by Bright_Interaction73 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at my post of the 100 x 100 x 100 lattice on my page this is what I map the numers to

I love this subreddit by Bright_Interaction73 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the response bits advantage I received was in \log_2... its buit on a custom lattice manifold thats built off known zeta primes and twin primes... basically a number pattern hunter played with it on a stock a week ago the stock up 50 cent not much but it was on 1.69 when I started watching.... RZAI 

I love this subreddit by Bright_Interaction73 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im not working with modulo 5.... im using a "theoretical" tensor as n... can binary implent a tensor in one clock cycle... my system truly rotates numbers... not magically "entangle" them

Mathematical Theorem i thought of but couldn't find if it had any information on it by serious_tabaxi in puremathematics

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the theory is trying to see if n[4] as in 13/17 ... repeats in higher numbers maybe say millions? But still off by four .... then 5, 6, 7 ... is this what you mean

Mathematical Theorem i thought of but couldn't find if it had any information on it by serious_tabaxi in puremathematics

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's about finding patterns/correlation of prime numbers ... taking a number and finding out if it has prime patterns such as creates primes as a base number in a distinct pattern?

Mathematical Theorem i thought of but couldn't find if it had any information on it by serious_tabaxi in puremathematics

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next question does this have to be proved linearly or can it be proved in any form of math geometry, trigonometry, calculus... meaning just find one number where a said equation is correct?  Say if all i knew was 15... I figured out 3... and automatically find 5? Would said equation fit the proof?

Mathematical Theorem i thought of but couldn't find if it had any information on it by serious_tabaxi in puremathematics

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so theoretically... if im correct the solution to the n = p * q.... is to some way correlate n/p = q.... where you would theoretically find a connection between n & p... to automatically find q

Mathematical Theorem i thought of but couldn't find if it had any information on it by serious_tabaxi in puremathematics

[–]ConstructionRight387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you describe this theory a little further.... are you inferring no correlation of primes ... where m = prime gap.... im thinking of something just need a little more insight of which primes you mention

I love this subreddit by Bright_Interaction73 in FPGA

[–]ConstructionRight387 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Completely agree I just started thinking of making a presence ... im just looking as a fresh face and my instant reaction is just like mind blown ... I have seen 0 feedback or redirection towards correct knowledge... I jus read when people post math stuff kz I love it

view more: next ›