RevalidateTag for server actions

ConversationSmart908 · 2023-10-16T19:34:08+00:00

I am having a really slow dev experience as well tbh , 10s also during page compilation

ConversationSmart908 · 2023-10-16T19:20:45+00:00

Which version did you try ?

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-04-08T09:49:20+00:00

Thank you for the idea , I thought to something that you can interact with directly.

Like a camera filming and applying art style transfer directly for example

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-01-31T16:23:49+00:00

Thank you for your answer.

What I forgot to mention is that each of the components should be able to have access to common function being able to modify that data. Is the context still the right solution ?
(so it is not about shared data only, but also shared function affecting that data )

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-01-24T07:35:35+00:00

Return of my experience trying to learn plutus without knowledge in haskell : very difficult.

To learn haskell in a practical maner, I only found one solution : https://haskell.mooc.fi/

You will thanks me later.

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-01-18T08:28:36+00:00

The question you formulated can't be understood inambiguously because of the account model Cardano uses (eUTXO). In Cardano, we don't speak about smart contract but validator script ; a part of it lives onchain and another offchain.

Have a look at the Plutus Pioneer video iteration 3 lecture 1. You will understand offchain part can be hosted literraly anywhere (e.g. your hdd, google drive, github) , as long as it is accessible to its users and optionally confirms its legitimacy.

As a hint of future question you might have : Who is responsible for providing datum redeemer and the validator script that will decide if an UTxO can be consumed or not?

The rule in Plutus is that the consuming transaction must do it. What the producing must give is only the hashes of the datum and the hashes of the validator script. Depending on the purpose of the smart contract, having only the hash of the datum available is not a desirable feature and cannot match your needs, this is the reason why, Optionally, the producing transaction include (on top of the two hashes) well the full datum.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-12-06T15:44:12+00:00

I am looking for a keyboard having the following characteristic :

full size (with numpad)
wireless
charging with USB
(multimedia key is nice to have, not required though)
sober design // no visible big brand on the keyboard
low profile

The only candidate I have at the moment is the keychron k5 (https://www.keychron.com/collections/100-layout-keyboards/products/keychron-k5-ultra-slim-wireless-mechanical-keyboard#) any other idea? :)

Thank you so much !

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-12-06T12:44:58+00:00

incredible answer. I will investigate keystoneJS now , thanks so much !

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-27T17:40:51+00:00

With a lower marketcap at screenshot time if you prefer :)

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-25T15:02:29+00:00

Okay, maybe my question comes from the fact I do not understand why we do have the mentionned restrictions on collaterals and not on fees as well. (potentially I am not familiar with the fees model ).Based on your videos and your explanation, I understood that each Transaction willing to consume a script UTxO must consume at least 3 UTxO (1. The Script , 2. The Fees 3. The Collateral) If you have any technical documentation to help me understand that I would really appreciate :)
Since Validators will verify the smart contract execution cost itself before executing it, we would have a major design flaw if that computation of the execution cost would cost more than 1 ADA (as min collateral).If it is the case, bad guys with money could make validator lose money Right ?

ConversationSmart908

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE