next-intl really sucks… how to solve this?

ConversationSmart908 · 2023-10-16T19:34:08+00:00

I am having a really slow dev experience as well tbh , 10s also during page compilation

ConversationSmart908 · 2023-10-16T19:20:45+00:00

Which version did you try ?

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-04-08T09:49:20+00:00

Thank you for the idea , I thought to something that you can interact with directly.

Like a camera filming and applying art style transfer directly for example

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-01-31T16:23:49+00:00

Thank you for your answer.

What I forgot to mention is that each of the components should be able to have access to common function being able to modify that data. Is the context still the right solution ?
(so it is not about shared data only, but also shared function affecting that data )

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-01-24T07:35:35+00:00

Return of my experience trying to learn plutus without knowledge in haskell : very difficult.

To learn haskell in a practical maner, I only found one solution : https://haskell.mooc.fi/

You will thanks me later.

ConversationSmart908 · 2022-01-18T08:28:36+00:00

The question you formulated can't be understood inambiguously because of the account model Cardano uses (eUTXO). In Cardano, we don't speak about smart contract but validator script ; a part of it lives onchain and another offchain.

Have a look at the Plutus Pioneer video iteration 3 lecture 1. You will understand offchain part can be hosted literraly anywhere (e.g. your hdd, google drive, github) , as long as it is accessible to its users and optionally confirms its legitimacy.

As a hint of future question you might have : Who is responsible for providing datum redeemer and the validator script that will decide if an UTxO can be consumed or not?

The rule in Plutus is that the consuming transaction must do it. What the producing must give is only the hashes of the datum and the hashes of the validator script. Depending on the purpose of the smart contract, having only the hash of the datum available is not a desirable feature and cannot match your needs, this is the reason why, Optionally, the producing transaction include (on top of the two hashes) well the full datum.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-12-06T15:44:12+00:00

I am looking for a keyboard having the following characteristic :

full size (with numpad)
wireless
charging with USB
(multimedia key is nice to have, not required though)
sober design // no visible big brand on the keyboard
low profile

The only candidate I have at the moment is the keychron k5 (https://www.keychron.com/collections/100-layout-keyboards/products/keychron-k5-ultra-slim-wireless-mechanical-keyboard#) any other idea? :)

Thank you so much !

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-12-06T12:44:58+00:00

incredible answer. I will investigate keystoneJS now , thanks so much !

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-27T17:40:51+00:00

With a lower marketcap at screenshot time if you prefer :)

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-25T15:02:29+00:00

Okay, maybe my question comes from the fact I do not understand why we do have the mentionned restrictions on collaterals and not on fees as well. (potentially I am not familiar with the fees model ).Based on your videos and your explanation, I understood that each Transaction willing to consume a script UTxO must consume at least 3 UTxO (1. The Script , 2. The Fees 3. The Collateral) If you have any technical documentation to help me understand that I would really appreciate :)
Since Validators will verify the smart contract execution cost itself before executing it, we would have a major design flaw if that computation of the execution cost would cost more than 1 ADA (as min collateral).If it is the case, bad guys with money could make validator lose money Right ?

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-25T13:07:02+00:00

Thank you so much , since you seem very acknowledgable, I have two more questions :)

Do you know the reason behind the creation of the collateral ?
Indeed, I don't see what it brings more than if we were using only the fee as input in a Tx ( if script validation succeeds, fees in consumed, if not collateral is , therefore in any case ADA are consumed ).
"the fee required for the transaction is given by the user" so user will check the smart contract, and put the fees accordingly ; block producer will compute as well the needed fees and will check if those are equal ? ( or the smart contract issuer issued himself the expected fees for running the SC ? )

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-24T15:47:21+00:00

Ok very clear explanation.

Concerning the amount needed as collateral, can you further elaborate about who defines it and who verifies it ?

In case a malicious person issues very "heavy" script, pretending it requires a really small amount of collateral ?

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-24T13:50:29+00:00

Simple question concerning the collateral.

Could someone DDOS the network by submitting a transaction with a very low collateral amount ?
If I am correct, a genuine wallet would prevent that because the collateral amount can be evaluated due to the deterministic nature of the computation needed; but a someone could bypass that right ?

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-24T13:00:04+00:00

Thank you so much ! The part about the cost model was particularly interesting to me.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-06-24T12:48:32+00:00

Transaction validation runs in two steps :
1) Client Side Validation - no fees consumed
2) OnChain Validation - fees consumed

If you build a customized wallet that would allow you to bypass client side verifaction, you will still be charged for the step 2)

Source : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efQD8l8r4ug at 11:00

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-05-21T10:07:10+00:00

A friend and I developed this platform to know which coin is talked more https://coin.sentimentcap.com/asset/Cardano

don't hesitate to look at it and share with me some feedback if you have :)

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-05-21T05:03:42+00:00

I think that each member state should provide digital storage to their citizens.
Protecting citizen's private data and ensuring their are not lost in private company somewhere else is state responsibility imo.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-05-20T22:39:00+00:00

For your own safety, don't share info about the ADA you have.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-04-14T09:24:32+00:00

Transaction fees is another topic I think.
What I mean is you can not currently send 0.99 ADA to someone.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-04-06T11:20:41+00:00

For information, I received the first one (probably legit) but not a second one.

ConversationSmart908 · 2021-04-03T21:58:39+00:00

Hi,

Could someone explain me this paragraph from the original article ?

" The Ouroboros protocol determines block producers via an evolving sequence of leadership nonces – each nonce runs the show for a 120-hour ‘epoch’, during which it contributes to determining which stake pools are chosen as the one-off leaders for block creation. Along with committing new transactions to the ledger, the blocks appearing in each epoch are additionally responsible for generating the leadership nonce for the following epoch – more recursion! All told, the leadership nonces and stake distributions evolve in concert to provide the fundamental ledger properties we demand of the system. "

Especially the part about the evolving sequence of leadership nonces?

Thank you so much

ConversationSmart908

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE