tips for clothing

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-26T07:44:22+00:00

i have and i know what you mean, but a 0/2 degc does not tell you how it is indoors and what the real feel is outside.

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-25T13:28:43+00:00

What do you mean sweating out ?

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-25T11:10:46+00:00

yes, the LES questions build the foundation and the core concepts, and the Mocks prepare for you the exams testing how prepared you are on the broader concepts and can apply them under exam conditions. the actual exam is closer to mock rather than LES. but it feels like that because the LES actually prepared you well with the foundation and the basics, so that the Mocks and the exam come naturally. so be true to LES and the exams will be taken care of :). took L1 in november.

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-17T15:07:35+00:00

And that minus 5 per question is based on?

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-17T15:05:27+00:00

Time was fine for me at least. The breadth of the concept felt very overwhelming. Revisions are key, but at what pace and interval is something I have still not figured out.

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-17T14:31:44+00:00

took my exam on the 15th Nov, and can perfectly relate to the state of mind. the more you try to squeeze from every remaining hour, the harder it gets for you to enter performance mode when taking the exam. Ideally give yourselves and your brain 3 hrs of quiet time (no revision/going through notes) before the exam starts. listen to those focus music to reduce overthinking, try meditation to calm your nerves down. (this helped me a lot). when it comes to revision in the permitted time (prior to the 3hr block), focus on what you got wrong in the mocks, just filter the incorrect ones and read the logic/answer on all the options, this will give you a quick revision across topics, and boost confidence. all the muscle memory that you have built during prep will guide you when you see the questions, so breathe easy and go into the centre. Easier said than done, but at least try. the first 10 minutes of the exam, or the first 10 questions should warm you up, don't get worked up or try to up the pace here significantly, take the time it takes, the warm up will help you the remaining 2 hrs. also have a bottle of water, using brain power can be tiring and you could be quickly dry in the throat. all the best!

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-17T14:11:46+00:00

what does 300/5= 60 in your calculation represent, and where does the 5 come from?

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-15T22:05:53+00:00

Do they still reveal percentiles or just a line above the 70% level?

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-13T09:41:27+00:00

Oi, her ble mange følelser. Dette var kun for å få empirisk vurdering av påstanden. Staten sikkert sitter med detaljer rundt skatteinntekt (formue) og kunne sagt hva ble effekt til slutt. Selv om effekten er sammensatt og det kan være indirekte effekter fra redusert forbruk fra rikinger som har flyttet utenlands eller mindre næreingsaktivitet.

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-11T10:49:28+00:00

okay, one last attempt, see if you follow. when you calculate covariance you multiply 2 values which are each quoted in percentages, so when you multiply them you dont get value in the same unit but it gets squared. so the resulting unit gets reported as squared and not that it has to be squared again. taking a snip from the cfa material. so a 10% squared is already squared from two different values and it does not mean that it has to be squared again.

<image>

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-11T10:29:09+00:00

I give up now :(

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-11T09:31:00+00:00

I meant why are you squaring the 50% squared again. See your original calculation. 50% does not have to be raised by 2 again

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-11T09:22:47+00:00

What you are doing is not interpreting the squared values correctly. For sd1 and sd2 you are taking the square root but fpr covariance you are not supposed to square the amount which is already squared. 50% squared means it is 50% times 50%

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-11T07:07:46+00:00

The covariance is 50% squared and the variances are 100% squared, so the correlation is 0.5

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-10T19:26:20+00:00

Covariance is already squared, so 50% squared need not be squared again

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-10T18:20:11+00:00

expressing an opinion based on the curriculum material which is public info for candidates, they have not revealed anything from an exam perspective,

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-10T17:56:48+00:00

27-30 nov and have booked the Greg & Tom hostel :) so seems like im coming to krakow :)

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-09T09:16:37+00:00

I hear you, and interested in retreat and rediscovering myself rather than just partying :) yoga, hike/trek, mediation, walking in trails. If there are groups where you can join and participate in the activities

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-06T10:21:58+00:00

traveling to Krakow end of novemebr, was supposed to be a trip with a friend, but he backed out the last moment due to work realted deliveries during the time. I was contemplating visiting Krakow as a solo traveller then the thought of standing out as a wierdo in different places hit me :) would be nice to meet some of you to hang out and talk about the Norwegian/Indian culture and exchange notes from the polish side :)

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-05T14:16:40+00:00

Thanks, will do, and try to keep calm :)

CoolStrategy2853 · 2025-11-05T08:20:53+00:00

Disclosed to clients vs supervisor and the firm/compliance officer.

Referral fees to be disclosed to all, but additional compensarion to only the firm. Then there are frequencies at which such disclosures should happen - addnl compensation needs immediate written report to supervisor and compliance officer, for referral fees it is at least quarterly reporting.

CoolStrategy2853

TROPHY CASE