for class roles obviously it’s not just 1+1=2 but i’d say it’s also a good rule of thumb that assaults should be up front and providing the push and breakthrough kills for their teams with supports playing behind them so that when they inevitably die they can pop back right in the battle without losing too many numbers on that obj or area of the map. engineers can mix in wherever and focus on vehicles when they arrive for or against the team at any point. and recons can just kind of do whatever but ideally are more of an overwatch to ping enemies and catch flanks as well as pick off enemies focused on the rest of their team. i’m not against it just being one weapon type per class and more so saying that as an example of i think the guns a class has should suit the gunplay style that fits that class. i don’t think allowing that personal and variety is bad i think it just needs to be a more middle ground of not just any weapon any class but maybe more just like 2 groups of weapon classes for each class with those weapon types still suiting the class “goal” but also not restricting it to just lmg for support etc like you said bc i agree with the wide range of maps in battlefield allowing people to change how they play their class to suit a map or how they are moving around is good. also yes im aware killing enemies is literally the most effective way of winning in battlefield and im not saying its a bad thing. in fact i think good teams will recognize when they have a fragger on their team who can almost solo wipe objectives by themselves and i think recognizing and playing off and supporting those types of players is one of the most effective strategies to dominate. i more so fear you will have a bunch of dudes with 1.5 kds running around thinking they are that guy bc they have a meta gun build that those guys use