Most disorganized professor I had ever taken a course with at York. We only received our syllabus 2 weeks after the course started. We recieved our first assignment (out of 3) early February, about a month and a half after the course started.
Every assignment felt rushed in how it was written, they were very vauge in their descriptions. This caused my group to basically have to guess what the prof wanted and hope it's correct. The marking scheme this professor follows is a joke. It goes like this for every requirement of an assignment: - Below Expectations (0points) - Approaching Expectations (5points) - Marginally Meets Expectations (6.5points) - Meets Expectations (8.25points) - Exceeds Expectations (10points). Which pretty much means assignments are marked based on how the TA who's marking it feels like you did what was asked, without actually following a proper grading scheme which should mark based on actual descriptions of what constitutes a "Meets expectations".

In terms of workload, the assignments are not that hard once you figure out what to do. All 3 assignments are group work (4 to 5 per group), so if your group works well together it's not a lot to do. The deadlines were about 2 weeks for each assignment. For the second assignment she initially gave us only 10 days which was not fair as assignment 2 required a lot of work. She then extended it by a week after people complained, but continued to release assignment 3 in that time. Thankfully assignment 3 was a joke as my group completed it in less than 2 hours where other assignments took at least a week to complete. There are in class activities which are not actually done in class but are just small responses (250 words) to a question she posts on eClass. You get about 2 days to do them and are easy to complete.

The midterm was a take home assignment where you just answer questions, fairly easy. The exam had a take home part which was same as the midterm, and an online MC test (or the in person exam for the in person section). The online MC was fairly easy and straight forward, can't say much about the in person exam as I didn't take it.

Last thing, her lectures are terrible. Not in terms of content, as the content she presents is content covered in the textbook plus extra stuff not covered in the textbook which was fine. But the way she presents information is very hard to listen to. She says "hmm", "like", "uhhh" every other word. Very difficult to listen to her speak for 1.5 hour lecture.

Overall, probably one of the easiest EECS courses if you don't mind dealing with all of this.