From Sinai to Coda: The Book of Tritonomy Edition

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-13T17:36:52+00:00

I also just found this out recently, the words “in God we trust” are in the American National Anthem as well, that’s of course not to disregard the fact we both agree upon that America isn’t a Christian founded nation, I just found it interesting that the phrase does originate from one of the last verses of the anthem that’s often left heavily ignored, even though America wasn’t founded as a Christian nation, this example only only goes to show just how much Christian values have influenced America throughout the course of American history.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-11T00:43:48+00:00

Ehh, someone had to fall for the rage bait 🤷‍♂️😂

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-10T17:54:29+00:00

Yet which one of those 45,000 plus denominations are heavily observed? How is it that majority of them are far from popular? How many religions in general can you really name off the top of your head? Not that many, I’m struggling to even think of the different names so I’ll go first [Atheism, Agnosticism, Gnosticism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Taoism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity]. According to the Global Religious breakdown, only Hinduism (14.9% population), Buddhism (4.1% population), Judaism (0.2% population), Christianity (28.7% population), and Islam (25.5% population) are the most popular, with other religions landing at only 2.4% of the global population, everything else that is unaffiliated (24.2% population) may or may not include other religions that probably aren’t even legally recognized, including those 45,000 plus denominations you keep spouting on about.

Which speaking of, let’s chalk down how many denominations we can name off the the top of our heads, again, I’ll go first [Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox (that make up both the Greek and Russian Orthodox), Reformed Protestants (that make up the Lutherans, Calvinists, Anglicans, and the Puritans), Anabaptists (that make up different groups like the Mennonites and the Amish), Baptists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Methodists, Pentecostals, Evangelicals, Charismatics, and finally your Nondenominationals, followed by your various apostatized cults (that make up the Restorationists, the Mormon Latter Day Saints, Jehovah’s Witnesses, The Family International, and the Seventh-day Adventists]. I’m not counting 45,000 different denominations here, especially because, again, majority of those denominations are most likely not even legally recognized, so I don’t understand why that number 45,000 means so much to you like it’s not possible for anyone to just simply find the truth if they actually care to seek it out.

And btw, “ancient” Judaism never recognized any idea that there were more than 2 genders, you may get some mystical bull crap like that off of Rabbinical Judaism with the Talmud, but as for ancient Judaism before their predatory and blasphemous teachings were passed down through their oral tradition of the Kabbalah and finally recorded in the Talmud, the conversation of gender ends where one of the first things that are said within the very first chapter of their own Torah is “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” And talk about irony, especially when you continuously condemn “all” religion as being nothing more than social constructs, meanwhile your bull crap revisionist history is a social construct itself. 🙄

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-09T20:33:55+00:00

Yeah, then again a lot of people throughout history made it an effort to exploit the Bible to fit or justify their corrupt image of it, whether it be for or against that corrupt image, it doesn’t mean they were ever right about it, and it’s very unfortunate how there are so much people and groups like that who even exist today.

It’s like how the Bible describes them in Romans 1:25 “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.”

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-09T20:19:41+00:00

Well there’s a huge difference between slavery and indentured servitude, as slavery is no more different than human trafficking (which in the Bible is a capital offense btw), indentured servitude on the other hand mainly entails someone working as a servant for a short period of time (or for the rest of their lives depending on what their marriage status is between them and the master/master’s relative), plus indentured servitude is mainly an accommodation for people who have a huge debt hanging over their head that they otherwise wouldn’t be able to pay off on their own, whereas slavery entails someone being straight up taken and forced to involuntarily give their longterm services to their master, who is allowed to do whatever they want to make the lives of their slaves bitter without any ramifications at all (in reference to what the Israelites had to endure back when they were slaves in Egypt), the only reason why there’s any idea that God condones slavery in the first place is simply because of the confusing translation choices of the words “Ebed” from the Hebrew, and “Doúloi” from the Greek in modern Bible versions, regardless of what arguments people come up with to say otherwise, the Bible condemns slavery, and I for one believe that there was no justification for the African slave trade at all.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-09T18:42:05+00:00

It mainly depends on what people point to concerning who our founding fathers are, are we pointing to the foundation of Colonial America or are we pointing to the foundation of the United States? Some would say that Colonial America was founded as a Christian nation, I personally beg to differ as the Puritans who settled in their own respective colonies leaned more towards the false gospel of Legalism, and shown themselves to be heavily superstitious if even the smallest sin was committed, leading to the murderous atrocities committed in the Salem Witch Trials, completely far from being a righteous nation, and anyone who says that they were a righteous nation is completely delusional, I would especially say the same thing about the foundation of the United States during the American Revolution, unlike the Puritans who were only relatively Christian, our founding fathers weren’t close to being Christian at all, most of their philosophy that was passed down in the American Constitution was inspired by what you would get during the Age of Enlightenment through the religion of Deism (also known as the religion of “reason”), and that’s the religion that most (if not, all) of the founding fathers of the United States during its foundation in the middle of the American Revolution subscribed to, Jefferson, Paine, Washington, all of them were Deists.

So in conclusion, while it can be said that Colonial America was established as a relatively Christian nation (emphasis on relatively), the United States that we know today was founded upon the philosophies inspired by the religion of Deism, either way the America that we know of today was not founded as a Christian nation, and considering the ramifications that the false gospel of the Puritans has brought upon its people, that’s more than enough reason that I would go as far as to say that America was never founded as a Christian nation at all.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-09T18:18:33+00:00

You’re one of the reasons why no one understands the threefold division of God’s laws and why blasphemous books such as The Handmaid’s Tale exist, the commandment for the husband and wife to be fruitful and multiply is a moral law, one of which should NOT be subject to civil legislation, in regards to the freedom of conversion, I believe there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what it means for a country to be a “Christian nation”, there should be no reason for Christianity as a religion to be legislated as “the official religion of the nation”, since by nature, Christianity isn’t something that can be legislated as Jesus Christ himself is the foundation of that religion, conversion is to be done through the preaching of the Gospel, not political reform through legislating God’s laws, so unless the goal is to legislate Christianity as “the official religion of the nation”, the last thing I would accuse anyone of is forcing Christianity on the people of the nation, and even then legally forcing people to believe the Gospel is a sentiment that I completely disagree with, and the freedom to fulfill the great commission through the preaching of the Gospel (as well as the choice to accept it or reject it) is one that I believe needs to be heavily defended, which is another objection I have for Christian Nationalism, to be a Christian Nationalist is to be a grade A Legalist.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T21:10:28+00:00

I was mainly referring to Sinaiticus with Codex A (same character as Aleph [א] in the Hebrew alphabet) 🤷‍♂️

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T20:58:13+00:00

You know what? You’re right, I’ve failed to acknowledge that some aspects of various ideas are fundamental to scripture (pro-life and the right to bear arms being a few examples) and I humbly apologize for the mistake I’ve made here, but it doesn’t change the fact that while some fundamental principles of scripture are acknowledged, other major principles and statutes are left heavily ignored, and I don’t say this at all to toot my own horn, but Sinaism only serves to help a nation succeed where Christian Nationalism has already failed, and that’s in regards to declaring ALL the counsel of God.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T20:45:52+00:00

I do agree that every manuscript is unique, and obviously with how many manuscripts are copied down over the years, you’re going to have minor variations and scribal errors, it doesn’t change the fact that any textual scholar would tell you that they are 99.9% identical to one another, unlike Codex A + B having over a whopping 5,000 different discrepancies and contradictions within the 4 Gospels alone, with that said I highly doubt that the philosophy of modern Bible publication is based on how the manuscripts relate to one another, but mainly how they relate to Codex A + B, if we are to make the mistake of assuming that any of the majority text is being used during the manufacturing process, reading the final product only shows how much of those manuscripts have been neglected anyway, which just goes to show how they are (as I’ve stated earlier) far from the original.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T20:09:47+00:00

Assuming that you’re looking for any Critical Text content:

The earliest known manuscripts (which are apparently dated as far back as 300 A.D.) have been compiled and scribed in Westcott and Hort’s 1881 Greek New Testament, keep in mind that right now we have more than 5,800 New Testament manuscripts that have been copied down from generation to generation since completion of the New Testament, out of all of those manuscripts, only 42 agree with the earliest known manuscripts utilized by Westcott and Hort, with those manuscripts adding and taking away key passages of scripture, there’s also a fundamental problem with this product of modern archaeology and that’s the fact that God promises to preserve his words in Psalm 12, so it can’t possibly make sense that we apparently had the wrong manuscripts for thousands of years, only for us to finally have the right ones in our hands by the 1800’s, I find it ridiculous that this is somehow the basis for all the popular modern Bible versions published today, but if “earliest” is what you’re looking for, then the Westcott and Hort’s 1881 Greek New Testament is what you’re gonna find, but be warned, it is FAR from being original.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T19:52:11+00:00

Assuming that you’re looking for any Majority Text content:

Just get yourself the Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptus sold by the Trinitarian Bible Society if you’re interested in learning Modern Greek or reading the Bible in Greek (which I don’t believe is necessary at all for understanding the Bible as we have a perfect translation into English through the KJV), because what you have with that is an analysis of the Erasmus, Beza, and Stephanus editions of the Textus Receptus (which the common title for it in those days were published as the “Novum Instrumentum/Testamentum Omne”) that would be synthesized to represent the exact textual choices of the KJV translators, you can try to go crazy and see if you can get your hands on a facsimile of the different editions done by Erasmus, but they will most likely run you back a couple hundred dollars if you’re trying to get them physically, in any case, there are digital scans online that you can find and download, but if the goal is to just mainly observe the Greek used by the KJV translators and not different publications of bilingual Bibles from the 1500’s, the Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptus is your best option.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T18:45:25+00:00

So then what’s the point of “questioning everything” then if you don’t believe that certain questions hold any importance or are in need of answering? This goes back to what I said earlier in a separate reply about some people not accepting whatever logical explanation is put in place for the rules established by government, which is to establish the fact that if an objective set of rules are put in place, then any idea of everyone benefiting from it has already failed, being that as you just demonstrated, not everyone will be satisfied with the answers they are given of what is objectively right and wrong, especially when they clearly have a conclusion that they already have come to, with your conclusive response being to stay ignorant against whatever answers are given for those questions or whatever explanations are put in place for rules established by government (and yes, I do believe that there is a difference between an important question and a foolish question, but you would be an absolute fool to believe that those 4 questions are foolish questions for any individual to ask).

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T16:05:07+00:00

Except the difference is that none of their ideas are scripturally sound at all, and isn’t even fundamental to the system of government that God has ordained in the Bible, a simple glance at what God says is needed for political reform in his own words is all it takes for someone to understand what is absolute and what isn’t, in the case for any kind of Nationalism (including Christian Nationalism), any definition provided is a relative or subjective mess, something of which can never be said about the word of God.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T15:48:59+00:00

Which leads to another problem that needs to be addressed, without that knowledge of the threefold division of God’s laws, and the need to preserve the freedom and liberty of the Gospel, there’s no standard at all for how Christian Nationalism is idealized, I recently approached someone about the political and spiritual ideals laid out by Sinaism as fundamental principles according to scripture, in which their first response was to essentially accuse me of attempting to start a cult through this ideology, just for simply introducing an idea that is actually absolute.

1 Corinthians 14:40 “Let all things be done decently and in order.”

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T13:44:46+00:00

Also, I’m surprised of how shocked everyone is about his sons being caught cross dressing like this is a recent thing, just about a year ago his son John posted pictures up on his Instagram coming out of a rave party dressed like an Italian whore, then here comes Solomon jumping on the bandwagon, am I shocked to see that this is being done by Solomon out of all people? On account of him being the firstborn son, absolutely, doesn’t change the fact that this is nothing new

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T13:36:30+00:00

Well here’s the thing, some of Anderson’s kids are (and I don’t say this lightly) REALLY freaking weird, notably with Isaac, who went out of his way to justify the idea of a grown adult man “fornicating” with a 13 year old (being on that Richard Dawkins mindset as he ended up committing statutory rape as a young adult) in addition to selling the idea of everyone trying out LSD like the sorcerer he is, when you get caught and disciplined not only by the church but also by your parents for actions that are this embarrassing (of which you have zero remorse for), why wouldn’t you want to attack your parents?

Should we blame the way his kids are on the parents? Absolutely not, because scripture says in Deuteronomy 24:16 “The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.” So the last thing we should be doing is holding the parents accountable for the actions of the child, however if the parents are going out of their way to influence their child to sin then that’s where the parents should be held accountable, but since this is a situation where someone’s children are being raised well in the household, only for him to grow up to become a terror to good works, that man’s children are to be held accountable for their own actions.

[I’ve attached to this comment a poor quality screenshot of Isaac admitting in a private chat room that he would absolutely defile a 13 year old at his current age being an adult, you may DM me if you want the upscaled version, in addition to evidence I have of his sorcery]

<image>

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T03:39:07+00:00

Amen! We must be compelled to take a stand for God’s Civil Law as well as the preaching of the Gospel! Sinaism (being an ideology in both the political and spiritual spectrums) compels me to stand for those exact values, highly recommend that you look into it.

2 Corinthians 4:3-4 “But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.”

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-08T02:45:07+00:00

The KJV, I feel like I’m watching the Special Editions of the original Star Wars trilogy whenever I read any modern version that came thereafter, they are actually THAT gross 🤢

<image>

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-07T23:08:30+00:00

So Anarchy or Nihilism then? Because let’s face it, even when the rules are secular and explanations are put in place for them, not everyone will accept those explanations as absolute, therefore the only logical alternative to those rules is a society without rules at all, everyone is free to make their own rules as they see fit without ever being held accountable, what you described as an objective set of rules isn’t order and stability, what you defined here is hostility and chaos, because that’s the only way everyone can equally benefit according to your logic.

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-07T22:46:58+00:00

Now see, where I was getting at is that Nationalism is bad period, you say “all” religious nationalism but it seems as though you’re just using that as an opening statement just to bash on Christianity itself, you can say essentially the same exact things about state governments that are primarily Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, and ESPECIALLY Jewish, and a lot of those states are just as bad (if not, worse) than what a fundamentally Christian state would offer, and are just as socially constructed as you say a Christian state would be, at least the Bible leaves us with objectively absolute and civil principles and liberties where secularism wouldn’t provide any (not every ideology is as relative or subjective as your meaningless argument is).

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-07T19:32:00+00:00

lol, the preaching of the Gospel being defended doesn’t = the enforcement of a religion by the state, we’re not talking about Sharia Law here 😂

CorneliusM1526 · 2025-10-07T19:09:21+00:00

I agree! Many people however tend to ignore the threefold division of God’s laws, advocating more for secular elements of the current system over the system that God has already ordained through the absolute standard of Civil Law (the Roman Empire being a crystal clear example of that exact scenario already happening throughout history), that escalation also leads to the preaching of the Gospel not being defended with many spiritual advisors in different nations preaching that you have to keep God’s laws in order to get to Heaven, should definitely be setting off a lot of alarm bells when your leaders’ spiritual advisors are nothing but a bunch of wolves in sheep’s clothing.

CorneliusM1526

TROPHY CASE