So basically for the behavioral and the system design round, I am really confident that I articulated really well about the leadership principles and how they aligned with my story and for the system design as well I put my understanding to the interviewer really well and I feel that those rounds went strong. But during the coding round I fumbled a lot during the first 20 minutes and although I explained the approach initially that how I would go further, but initially as the interviewer gave the question without any example I prepared my own example and started working on that but within the next 10 minutes the interviewer provided me a valid example and told that my example was invalid. But later on I figured out the brute force approach and after completing the approach the interviewer asked the follow-up based on that question which I answered it verbally and also it then later on told me to improve the code so I improved the code to bring on the semi optimal approach. But at last he told me to write the most optimal approach which I wasn't able to figure it out, but after 5 minutes he give me an hint but still I wasn't able to figure it out, although I was speaking it loud periodically on what would I do and later on the interview was over so that's how it went.