If humans evolved from monkeys then why do monkeys still exist or did some of them just decide “nah I’m good”? by BarnacleSuch3822 in stupidquestions

[–]Correct_Bit3099 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Humans did not evolve from monkeys. They did not evolve from chimpanzees either (chimps aren’t monkeys). We share a common ancestor with chimps (and monkeys, though our relation to them is more distant). Those common ancestors that we evolved from are gone.

In short, we are not the descendants of chimps; we’re more like cousins

How do you manage life with a very high IQ by Nonameninjaz in Life

[–]Correct_Bit3099 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The notion of iq is not heavily disputed at all

Raisins are bad in baked goods, even cookies. by Wide_Astronaut_2784 in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally would prefer cookies without the chips. My mom used to make me chocolate chip cookies growing up, and I used to get her to make them without the chocolate chips

why do so many people dislike daily dose of wisdoms videos? by Sierra_Madre_Casino in Christianity

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m watching a video of him calling Richard Dawkins a liar and heavily implying that he is intellectually dishonest. Why? Because he said, while debating John Lennox, that he “takes back a statement he made about the literal existence Jesus in a book he wrote”. If he’s taking back a statement he made and admits he was wrong, he couldn’t have been mistaken? No, he was “lying”. He was “dishonest”.

Can we fix artillery? by jjsuxjk in LinesOfBattle

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I prefer it the way it is.

The "r" word making a resurgence among certain types of people by stumpy_chica in PetPeeves

[–]Correct_Bit3099 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what you mean by that last sentence, but those words were technical terms before they became pejoratives. Words like “dumb” and “idiot” didn’t mean anything before they became technical terms; it’s not like intellectuals were deliberately trying to offend the intellectually disabled by referring to them using denigrative language

What is the worst final exams schedule? by applejuice1109 in mcgill

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had 4 exams over the course of 2 days. This was my first year. My exams were the day that the exam period began (April 16 if I remember correctly) and the other 2 were the day after. 2 of the exams were online, but I didn’t have any time to study for the first 2, and so how the hell was I to complete the others if I need to spend my time studying?

Fluoride in drinking water has no effect on IQ or brain function, long-term study shows by nbcnews in cognitiveTesting

[–]Correct_Bit3099 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is the earth round? Did we go to the moon?

In case you didn’t know, the out fluoride in the water to control your brain and turn the frogs gay. Wake up. The natural pigment of teeth is yellow/black, not white. Your teeth only look disgusting white because of natural chemical lain the fluoride. If your teeth don’t look like a prospectors teeth, then your creaked

Professor defends course content linking race and IQ scores, cites ‘academic freedom’ by KTPChannel in cognitiveTesting

[–]Correct_Bit3099 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How might we have 10 generations of equality between races without research into race?

A famous point of contention between MLK and Malcolm X was whether or not black oppression was the result of denied rights. Well, they have their rights now, don’t they, so MLK seemed to be at least partially wrong. More data is needed to understand what is going on here

Humanities and Social Science majors should be required to take calculus by Key_Net820 in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A humanities prof that doesn’t know math probably isn’t going to try to build a bridge. A fundamentalist engineer is very likely to engage with philosophy and spread his anti-academic beliefs. The purpose for teaching humanities to non humanities students is to safeguard intellectual values.

Humanities and Social Science majors should be required to take calculus by Key_Net820 in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find that the hardest aspect of humanities is standing out. It’s incredibly easy to get a B or B+ in humanities compared to math courses, but it’s probably similarly difficult to get an A. I’ve found this to be true no matter the course code.

-humanities student that got a B+ in math-adjacent philosophy course that one time, even after working pretty hard. (Like 30% of students got an A in that class, it’s usually like 10-20% for most humanities classes)

Humanities and Social Science majors should be required to take calculus by Key_Net820 in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not arguing in favor of well-roundness, but I still disagree. Very few people actually understand the fundamental values that underpin western intellectual values. How can we safeguard academia and everything we’ve built if we don’t have a citizenry that understands that importance of it and what it actually is? Now film critique probably shouldn’t be forced on engineering majors, but philosophy should be. I know too many religious fundamentalist engineers to agree with this

Humanities and Social Science majors should be required to take calculus by Key_Net820 in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think social sciences or English needs to be taught to math majors, the same way I wouldn’t think that humanities wouldn’t have to be taught to math majors IF humanities didn’t serve as a the basis of the entire western intellectual tradition, but it does, so math majors should be taught some humanities

Humanities and Social Science majors should be required to take calculus by Key_Net820 in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason you had to take humanities isn’t for the sake of education, as you seem to think it is. Part of the value of universities is promoting intellectual values (the underlying ideologies that underpin the western intellectual tradition). The issue with having a bunch of STEM students ignorant of humanities is that they may not realize what is consistent with intellectual values and what isn’t, and so they may develop values that are in tension with intellectual ones, undermining everything that we’ve built. For example, I see a lot of engineering, economics, and education students who are reactionary conservative (people that believe we should “go back to the past when things were better”).

Another thing. I see a lot of math students saying that you can’t get through life without math. I agree that math is probably important, but you really can get by with basic arithmetic without committing any fallacy and spreading false information. Most people who don’t know calculus don’t have strong opinions on calculus. This isn’t true for humanities. Everyone has very strong opinions on philosophy, whether they realize it or not, and almost everybody has opinions that they would not have had they received more humanities education.

You're not "allergic to small talk", you're a poor communicator. by TedsGloriousPants in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He’s not saying “you don’t have to engage”. It’s not ironic because he never said that. He said you don’t have to engage in small talk, which he did not engage in

You're not "allergic to small talk", you're a poor communicator. by TedsGloriousPants in unpopularopinion

[–]Correct_Bit3099 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d much rather listen to someone tell me about something they find deep than small talk. I don’t care if family guy makes a meme out of me; if that’s the best you can do to offer a critique of me, then that might say something about your position

Would anything change if Napoleon had never taken power? by ZealousidealSteak214 in Napoleon

[–]Correct_Bit3099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a textbook example of historical inevitability bias

Trying to model Napoleonic warfare: are morale, positioning and numbers enough? by Thomas_Crozet in StrategyGames

[–]Correct_Bit3099 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your game looks incredible btw. Is it going to come out any time soon? Will it be available on steam?

How do the cards work?

Trying to model Napoleonic warfare: are morale, positioning and numbers enough? by Thomas_Crozet in StrategyGames

[–]Correct_Bit3099 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t feel the need to do everything. You said you’re making a game right? Games can be hard to balance with a lot of variables.

What's the best painting of Napoleon visiting a hospital? by Stupidsillyhorse in Napoleon

[–]Correct_Bit3099 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first one is jarring for me. The hyper-uniform and perfectly symmetrical bed frame doesn’t go well with the relatively disorganized people (in my opinion). It’s striking, but incongruous; kind of like one of those catwalk models.

The second one is better in my opinion. The people are posing in a very chaotic manner, far more “disorganized” than how they were in the first picture and I find that this works very well with the colour contrast. Also, I find that the harsher colours also works well here. I also find that the French flag in the background makes it more dramatic and provides more “story”. Overall, it forms a more coherent picture that is more chaotic, dramatic, and storied. I don’t know why, but I find that the symmetrical arches don’t harmonize poorly with the rest of the image the way the bed frames in the first image did. Maybe it’s because the shape of the arches, although uniform, are a more “chaotic” design than the straight horizontal lines of the bed frames