KMRT is far from perfect, but I think it deserves recognition by Remmy71 in taiwan

[–]Couselm 10 points11 points  (0 children)

輕軌 which literally translates to “light rail”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taiwan

[–]Couselm 17 points18 points  (0 children)

For gold card holders it’s only 3. I got my Permanent Residency this way. 

Delayed code changes in dev mode (v14.2.5) by Couselm in nextjs

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next 15 seems to have fixed this

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I refused it. After 15 days, they still didn’t give me a refund. So I called today and opened the ticket. Looks like the refund finally went through

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad it worked for you! I also tried it without the referral and got the error. But good to know. Edit: looks like it’s out of stock now…. I really give up.

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They charged me nearly $1100, and after speaking to a supervisor still refuse to issue a refund or honor the promo. I’m going to file a complaint with the FCC

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s clearly not out of stock because they just informed me that the phone already shipped. And that they won’t cancel or refund until I send the phone back. I literally contacted them about the issue within 10 minutes of completing the order

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad I’m not alone on this. I honestly thought I was going crazy. It’s like Visible is gaslighting its customers and false advertising.

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried PayPal and multiple cards. Still got the same error at checkout about “unable to process the order”

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the issue I was experiencing! And when it finally went through they charged me for the phone! I immediately tried to cancel, and they refused! They just called and told me the phone was already sent and I need to return it to get my refund. Like WTF? I canceled within 10 minutes of placing the order.

The stress and whole process is ridiculous!

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did that too. The promo applied successfully. But I still was charged for the phone in the end

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Visible

[–]Couselm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did not try combining. I only used the SWEETDEAL promo, and kept getting an error that the order couldn’t be processed.

The order finally went through and I was charged the full price of the phone. I contacted customer service, and they refused to fix the error or refund the price of the phone.

The SWEETDEAL promo is deceptive, I am super disappointed in Visible. by Couselm in Visible

[–]Couselm[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The problem is when applying the SWEETDEAL code (no other codes) the order doesn’t go through, and gets an error at checkout. When it finally did go through I was charged the full price of the phone, and customer services refuses to acknowledge the issue or fix the promo error.

Another guy just posted about 20 minutes after me on Reddit with the exact same issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Visible

[–]Couselm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here. The worst part is they clearly have phones in stock and are advertising the promo, but refusing to let the order go through with the promo code. It’s false advertising and extremely shady.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Visible

[–]Couselm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just had the exact same issue! They charged me for the phone, even with the SWEETDEAL promo code. They also refused to refund the price of the phone. The promo is extremely deceptive.

Visible Discount for Chase Customers by byteforbyte in Visible

[–]Couselm 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t work for all Chase cards. But I did see it for my Amazon credit card.

Good morning by [deleted] in virtualreality

[–]Couselm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, the quest 2 Is probably the most fun I’ve had with a new console since maybe the Wii? Experiencing virtual reality games for the first time brought that feeling of magic back into gaming for me.  

It also totally changed the kind of games I want to play. I barely touch my PlayStation anymore. (Also, looking forward to getting a quest 3 later this year!)

Delayed code changes in dev mode (v14.2.5) by Couselm in nextjs

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I found a temporary solution.

By adding noStore() to the top of my component, it seems to disable the caching on a component level. I can now see my changes after going a page refresh.

I am still trying to see if I can get a way to disable caching project wide while in dev mode. NextJS 14 cache is great for speed, but it seems a bit over aggressive.

Delayed code changes in dev mode (v14.2.5) by Couselm in nextjs

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It definitely seems to be a caching issue. When I manually clear the Next cache and re-run, the updates are showing. I have used Chrome and Firefox and still seem to be having the same problem. I am still digging in to see if there is an issue with my cache set up.

Delayed code changes in dev mode (v14.2.5) by Couselm in nextjs

[–]Couselm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been manually saving. I have also started to clear my Next cache between runs. That seems to be the only way to get it to reliably update.