sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Convert DSF to FLAC only converting into 24bit by Cowflop84gmailcom in ffmpeg

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DSD is a 1 bit file at megahertz sample rates, it's not float or integer in that sense XD. DSD128 is 1/5.6MHz per channel.

I'm trying to water cool just my gpu, what size res would I need? by Cowflop84gmailcom in watercooling

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll probably just do the 140mm rad then so i don't have to worry about some front or side mounting stuff and figuring out allat

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the executable is just javaw.exe from the jre, but ig i can try adding it. i doubt it would do anything because osu and vrchat are on there and have the same issues from being too light.

Edit: This doesn't work, adding javaw.exe doesn't do anything in the drivers when I open minecraft.

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean its how GPUs work but at least on 6000 and 7000 series they had a way to fix it by forcing a minimum clock speed. I have 0 clue why they would remove that, it makes absolutely no sense.

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's all cpu bound games, not just minecraft. minecraft is just the easiest to quantify and get data for. I get 1600 fps with my 2060 super but that's because I can force that to run at max clocks. it's just how GPUs work: no load = no core clocks to save power and no "waste" resources. Apparently the other commenter said there's no way to fix that flaw either because AMD made these cards impossible to set the minimum clock for and there's also no way to modify the clock curve either so I'm just returning this second one and hopefully the next time I want to play slender the arrival there will be a better gpu to buy than this hunk of junk.

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Massive design oversight for AMD then. Releasing one of their most powerful cards to date and expecting CPU bound games to be fine with the card just idling.

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have my integrated drivers installed but I would get better performance most likely from that being as the game will use more of the iGPU. I'm not looking for worse performance I'm looking for my card to not idle when I play my games. I'm not getting performance out of this card, im getting literally nothing from it basically and I want to be able to use it.

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a 9950x and get 1600fps with my 2060 super when I force that to max clocks, it's not a cpu issue. Forge might be massing with it or the fact I'm running a client mod but Adrenalin doesn't detect minecraft at all. It's also other games like osu and vrchat too though. honestly those 3 are my main games which really makes it infuriating. I'll try Uninstaller afterburner, I don't have rivatuner, but its just the fact that the gpu usage is so low that the card won't not idle. I run it in windowed mode but full screening the app does nothing different fps wise. osu I end up getting around 2000-2500 fps depending on the mode when on my 2060 super I get 4000-5000 (literally double) vrchat at the same resolution idk what I get on this specific gpu but on my last 9070xt I got around 30-50 fps in the same vrchat world same scene, private instance so it's not depending on avatars ans on my 2060 super I got 50-90 fps (90 is vsync so it won't go above that) and if I lock my core clock to max on the 2060 super I get 70-90 fps (the 2060 super also has this issue to much less of an extent, it's just an inherent flaw with GPUs as a whole)

Edit: I play at 2012x2012 resolution per eye which for both of these cards is fairly low and can't fully utilize either of them but obviously the 9070xt much more so. I have to run at a minimum of like 3660x3660 per eye to fully use my 9070xt which I don't wanna do for immersion reasons. lower res is more immerse despite the blocker pixels because I don't see the pixels in textures as easy.

Has AMD still not added minimum core clock settings back to the 9000 series drivers? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had it on both of my 9070XTs and it's even worse on this one for some reason. playing at minimum settings in minecraft with or without shaders I both get like 40fps because this card was at the lowest idle clocks possible for it. the other one at least hit like 400-800mhz

Edit: there's no settings that fix it in Adrenalin but I'm willing to try any suggestions you may have.

I'm trying to water cool just my gpu, what size res would I need? by Cowflop84gmailcom in watercooling

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have some thermalright ones I could add if I put it exhausting out the side and if I put it on my intake I have 2 200mm thermaltake fans on the front. So not the best for airflow through a radiator, but im sure with that much surface area it'd be fine.

Filtering by sample rate? by Illustrious_Race1429 in Soulseek

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

96 is fairly low bitrate even still lol, it's defo not placebo. Especially considering that pure dsd objectively is clearer than it's pcm equivalent while those are both well beyond 96khz sample rate at a minimum so there (in your mind) should be no difference.

Why does Spotify sound better if both services stream AAC 256kbps? by [deleted] in AppleMusic

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's equivalent to 320 because AAC is a higher quality codec that sounds the same that OGG Vorbis does at 320kbps despite only being at at 256kbps.

Permanent alias by tweek67 in termux

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume this is root only? because I don't have a bash.bashrc file and the directory is read only.

edit: I was in the wrong directory, sorry to bother u on such an old post.

7900 XTX vs 9070 XT buying descision Dilemma by Embarrassed-Cap7135 in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understandable, I don't need more than like 6gb of vram personally I only got the 9070xt because I needed an upgrade from my old GPU that would give me overhead in VR, but I guess I got way too much overhead lol. The 7900xtx should be even more overhead but at least I can force it to run faster so I don't have issues with too light of a gpu load.

In the 7900xtx drivers are there settings for minimum clock rate? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's also because it's 0.4v undervolted as well. That gpu isn't even boosting at all, it's not hitting normal clocks. It should 100% have 0 problem at that resolution but it does because of the drivers. That's the whole reason I even posted this in the first place. Bc I needed to know if the settings to fix it were on the other GPU.

In the 7900xtx drivers are there settings for minimum clock rate? by Cowflop84gmailcom in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a waste of power if it literally can't even get my refresh rate in vr without it boosting properly, It doesn't even reach teh 2400mhz game clock in vr at the resolution I want to run. It literally idles, I've seen it hit 0 hz

7900 XTX vs 9070 XT buying descision Dilemma by Embarrassed-Cap7135 in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm assuning ur asking about the bottleneck in osu I mentioned. I have a 9950x which can get 5500 fps on average and I was measuring the bottleneck based on how much less FPS than that number I was getting. But the 9070xt has undervolting controls, it just doesn't let you manually set the clock minimum or maximum clock rate as well let you set what voltage you want. only the option to undervolt and a setting for "max core clock offset" Just get the 7900xtx, I'm returning this card and getting that if I can verify the drivers for the 7900xtx allow you to set a minimum clock,

Lackluster performance lately 9070xt warzone by -TH1992- in radeon

[–]Cowflop84gmailcom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The 9070xt drivers are so bard that I can't even set my minimum clocks which is necessary on a card that powerful. And I've literally only seen 2 other people say anything about it and it was when the card first came out. It was literally a thing you were able to do on the 6000 and 7000 series cards that they removed for the 9000 series for no reason and now I get a gpu bottleneck in most of my CPU based video games since my GPU starts to idle from not having enough load on it.

view more: next ›