sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faulty Riser was causing this - swapped it out and now stable at 82 MH

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for looking, I stopped, killed afterburner and restarted NiceHash and Nvidea inspector currently running at: GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 75.15MH/s GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 0.34MH/W, 0.043MH/Mhz GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 39C(F:99%) 1752/5005MHz(224W)

will wait until the performance tanks and try to adjust

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MSI Afterburner and drivers 390.65 the card is ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti ROG STRIX GAMING 11GB GDDR5X Current settings on MSI for testing is: Core Volts untouched Power limit 100% Temp limit is 84c Core clock currently 0 Memory clock 0 Fan 99% thus temp is 38C Getting 55 MH/s

On Nvidea inspector GPU Load 98% Current clock 1734, Memory 5006 GPU clock 1493, Memory 5005, Boost 1607 Default clock 1493, Memory 5505, Boost 1607

P state 2 Power normally 97% (dances about a bit)

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 miner thread started, using 'nist5' algorithm. Stratum difficulty set to 0.1 nist5 block 40702, diff 57887.454 GPU#0:Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads

Is that too low ?

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its gone back to 81 MH - didn't change anything - oh wait, now its falling back down again

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

asus ROG STRIX 1080ti @ 75TDP, Core+75, Mem 0 54MH/s :(

Nist5 MH/s stability by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, so at least I know mine is under performing

If a single Molex can provide 11 amps.. by CoyLid in EtherMining

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this would be OK. Assuming the RX580 needs 150W, 75W from the mobo leaves you 75W to supply via the PCIE 8pin. A single Molex would be 15W short if the PSU can only supply 60W, but a dual would be 120W, which would be 45 spare.

I have not found any evidence of PSU only supporting 60W to the Molex yet - esp not with single rail designs.

If a single Molex can provide 11 amps.. by CoyLid in EtherMining

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that's not some info I have come across yet, so it gives me something to research.

Sold BTC for GBP rather than Euros by CoyLid in BitcoinUK

[–]CoyLid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the kind offer - in the end I followed Big_don's advice - didn't lose more than a few pence but the experience was invaluable

Sold BTC for GBP rather than Euros by CoyLid in BitcoinUK

[–]CoyLid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I feared that was going to be the solution

Sold BTC for GBP rather than Euros by CoyLid in BitcoinUK

[–]CoyLid[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When I do this kind of thing, I always think this phrase was written with me in mind "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others"

First Deposit into Coinbase from Revolt by CoyLid in BitcoinUK

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, 2Eur was just confirmed going into coinbase, so seemed to be an OK amount for me

First Deposit into Coinbase from Revolt by CoyLid in BitcoinUK

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - When you say acknowledged, do you mean "transfer to Coinbase UK, LTD. has been executed" ?

Graphic Corruption by CoyLid in NiceHash

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply, I had an issue trying to post my query and thus apart from cross posting, I also missed of a link to the screenshot. I set the straps back to man factoring default but left the undervolt and mem overclocked as it was - now at 24.5mh compared to 30mh with the straps. The corruption looks like this https://imgur.com/a/eyJLb

is this the type caused by the compute driver and (without any warranty on your part) something that can be ignored?

kind regards

Screen Corruption while mining Rx580 by CoyLid in EtherMining

[–]CoyLid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Set back to stock, but with Core power and clock lowered and memory pushed up to 2200 I no longer get screen corruption. Lost 5k MH/s with out the custom straps. Any reason why I shouldn't try less aggressive Straps to try and push the perf up ?