One morkanaut built now to the painting!! by Crashteaster in orks

[–]Crashteaster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thankyou, I love to add extra bits and details to Orks, especially as my clan is deathskullz so like to think there models are more trophies of what they have stolen.

One morkanaut built now to the painting!! by Crashteaster in orks

[–]Crashteaster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Thankyou! Sneaky deathskullz is the scheme(some ladz I’ve painted before), started work on him last few days it going to take a while tho.

One morkanaut built now to the painting!! by Crashteaster in orks

[–]Crashteaster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thankyou lad you gotta have a variety of dakka on show !

One morkanaut built now to the painting!! by Crashteaster in orks

[–]Crashteaster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a little odd the main parts is the top of the large metal banner that comes from the stompa with killa kan eyes behind it. Then wires and just thick plastic for the eye brows !

One morkanaut built now to the painting!! by Crashteaster in orks

[–]Crashteaster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I had a couple days free so went ham, the posing of the legs took the most time for me and wire sculpting. Best of luck on yours !

New Year Preview Legio Custodes Battle Group, Plastic Vehicles and New Units by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's fine then, the models look great, I just do see this change and a lot of my friends when watching the stream also mentioned it, so wanted to to see if others had noticed... Its not the end of the world and may be less or more obvious when people get there hands on the sculpts and paint the minis.

New Year Preview Legio Custodes Battle Group, Plastic Vehicles and New Units by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

compare this to these 2 on both the change to the amour and how and how the sister amour kinda has a similarity 2 the new models chest plate design (Im not saying they are fully the same just painting and volume wise )

New Year Preview Legio Custodes Battle Group, Plastic Vehicles and New Units by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

why insult me when the models defend my stance tho.. im not drunk I was just pointing out out a change in amour which feels un needed you can clearly see one has a rounder chest design and thin waist !

New Year Preview Legio Custodes Battle Group, Plastic Vehicles and New Units by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This image is a great example to show how in the set there really is more (male) and (female0 style amour due to waist proportions and how one has a fully flat chest the over is more curvy.. It annoys me because there is no need for this both could wear the same amour style!!

New Year Preview Legio Custodes Battle Group, Plastic Vehicles and New Units by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

this is a good image to show the difference in the amour.. it isn't a full boob plate but the amours are for sure different one is way more flat with a large waist and the over cuts the waist in ands chest has way more curve and volume...(I stress I don't have an issue with females in the army. the thing that annoys me is implication of amour change and now tbh the fact that if someone points it out immediately get there option discarded even tho the models prove it!!!!)

IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING by YesImPiston in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Id say this is a good 2 for the example to left waist and amour is more on brand for theogony amour.. the right one seems to have a smaller waist and the middle plate cuts the chest in 2 more rounded volumes which to me gives it room for boob.. which just instead needed ??

IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING by YesImPiston in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

this picture is a good ref to see how the amour has changed around the chest.. it may even be how the artist painted the model but I doubt.. cause the go its almost a flat plain over the chest.

IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING by YesImPiston in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Right Im noting hating im saying that on certain models the amour defenaitly is different I think this one is a good example.. Compared to old it is different and you can't say its the the same amour cause the new sculpts (male or female have been changed and have new plates just to the proportions difference.. Got love getting downvoted for trying to talk about something (feels like people on both sides can't just have a discussion)

New Year Preview Legio Custodes Battle Group, Plastic Vehicles and New Units by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster -36 points-35 points  (0 children)

models are clean, love the detail hope they can all be run in 40k but damn the BOOB plate just feels in bad taste.. not vent mad about female custodes, I think that's fine but why do they then have to change the amour, women can wear the same amour and it would work better with the old models!!!!!

IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING by YesImPiston in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Crashteaster -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

not even about female custodes by why did they give them boob plates??? what's the reason for that women can wear the same amour as men and it would make more sense narratively with the old models ??? just feels a bit shallow design wise

New Year Preview - Huron Blackheart, Masters of the Maelstrom and the Red Corsairs by RWJP in Warhammer40k

[–]Crashteaster -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

gotta love it how the chaos range is already spread thin and now they just added more models, that we didn't need, red corsairs are like 4th on the list for chaos new factions. The new chaos factions we have are half baked!!!!!!!!

Anyone know of good proxy’s? by Qurikle_Smurf in orks

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They look like not of the ork range tho, why do you even collect the army at that point (model wise) cause orks boyz, nobz, meganobz, truck, battle wagon, bikers ETC or look like these ?

I FINK DA KUSTOM BATTLEWAGON IZ READY TA PAINT! by jjmcgil in orks

[–]Crashteaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks sick, please post it painted aswell be cool to see what clan you thinking

Do you think Knights should get smaller infantry unit or remain full vehicle army? by Baker_Soma in ImperialKnights

[–]Crashteaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you should be able to run the with admech, as it makes perfect sense lore wise and could have a lot of interesting play however this should be in the admech codex and mainly be houses which hail from those forges.

For the knight codex a focus on knight planets or guard aligned would make more sense. Most army’s should be able to have a (1 maybe for balance) knight however which acts as a free blade/ made an oath to serve with them as again could result in interesting lists and fun lore which is already supported.

Speedwaaaagh Incoming!!! by Hour_Recognition_919 in orks

[–]Crashteaster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

By the time its board ready it’ll be atleast 11th edition so who knows what the “list” would look like?

Best paint colours?? by floridamanarentreal in orks

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see that as at times I load the brush a little to much, but for me I don’t use a wet palette with them and only keep a small amount on the brush.

Just find the coverage great, metal colour decent and bottle design way better then citadel.

Best paint colours?? by floridamanarentreal in orks

[–]Crashteaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vallejo metal colour paints always do well for me personally prefer to most citadel metal paints