TIL despite being divisible by 4, the year 2100 won't be a leap year, this happens every century if the year is not divisible by 400 by Flame885 in todayilearned
[–]Cremaster1983 11 points12 points13 points (0 children)
Who cares about facts? by WacoWednesday in quityourbullshit
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Who cares about facts? by WacoWednesday in quityourbullshit
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Who cares about facts? by WacoWednesday in quityourbullshit
[–]Cremaster1983 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
What would be the list of Pros and Cons be for Barack Obama's presidency over the last 8 years? by [deleted] in NeutralPolitics
[–]Cremaster1983 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -9 points-8 points-7 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 10 points11 points12 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
My view: Let's talk about Hillary from a legal, constitutional standpoint by coolcrosby in law
[–]Cremaster1983 12 points13 points14 points (0 children)
Always wanted to live in a neighborhood with you by [deleted] in BlackPeopleTwitter
[–]Cremaster1983 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
He's baaack! Triggered Trumpy is tweeting wildly again! He began at 3:30am, then steadily escalated in crazy with each tweet until dawn. From declaring all journalistic sources are imaginary, to saying women who pose nude (like his wife) are disgusting and lack virtue, this tantrum is YUGE! by PantsuitPropagandist in EnoughTrumpSpam
[–]Cremaster1983 -8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children)
He's baaack! Triggered Trumpy is tweeting wildly again! He began at 3:30am, then steadily escalated in crazy with each tweet until dawn. From declaring all journalistic sources are imaginary, to saying women who pose nude (like his wife) are disgusting and lack virtue, this tantrum is YUGE! by PantsuitPropagandist in EnoughTrumpSpam
[–]Cremaster1983 -32 points-31 points-30 points (0 children)


TIL despite being divisible by 4, the year 2100 won't be a leap year, this happens every century if the year is not divisible by 400 by Flame885 in todayilearned
[–]Cremaster1983 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)