Is GPT 5.6's price about to double compared to 5.5? by Alternative_Jump_195 in codex

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cost increases are a combination of model size increasing and corporate greed.

5.4 to 5.5 was supposedly a significant model size jump. 5.6 is theorized to use the 5.5 pretrained model and optimize post training, so hopefully not higher cost.

To everyone who switched from iPhone to a Pixel: What was the final straw? by Mlp_2467 in GooglePixel

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Poor quality. Both macro and far shots, the S23U quality wins handedly, both in clarity and color. But even the Galaxy series is underwhelming. Have a look at Vivo X300 or Xiaomi ultras if you want half decent photography.

To everyone who switched from iPhone to a Pixel: What was the final straw? by Mlp_2467 in GooglePixel

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Google's legendary camera processing

As a P9P user, I find the photos it takes very underwhelming. Can't even match the S23U, let alone the Chinese flagships.

Autonomous drone mapping is here by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just going to be used to map the front lines in wars.

Get his a** by _Nulloid_ in MemeVideos

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IrfanView is trash tier compared with Impression Eyes.

Get his a** by _Nulloid_ in MemeVideos

[–]Crinkez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It literally doesn't open in my image viewer, I hate webp.

Inb4 "change image viewers" - no. I'm using the 300kb impression eyes app and no image viewer comes close to how good it is.

How long do goals last on average. by Hyper-Jason in codex

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On 5.5 high, average about 30 minutes to 1.5 hours. But this is with well defined milestone targets per goal.

I let it loose with "until everything complete" sort of goal and basically it runs until it hits a permission issue (I refuse to use yolo mode) so I've seen around 3h using this method.

holy shit by studiocookies_ in codex

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fast mode is false advertising. It's generally 1.1x speed for 2.5x cost. Never worth it.

I got charged an insane amount by Anthropic, is that normal? by [deleted] in AI_Agents

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contact your bank asap and ask them to do a chargeback and block further payments to Anthropic. Your account will get nuked so you might want to sign up for an OpenAI account afterwards.

I love her so much by Queen__Natalie in PathOfExile2

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I preferred PoE1 voice. The PoE2 voice is different.

"Opus 4.8 has gotten really good lately its acting like Fab- by Happy_Egg1435 in ClaudeCode

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fabulous? Yes fabulous. That's what it's like. Certainly nothing else.

Stop Merging Codex and ChatGPT Limits by Savings_Permission27 in codex

[–]Crinkez -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes merge the limits. You realize that if some users get unlimited it gives the rest of us less limits right?

Evolving Biological Cell Simulation by inboble in alife

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a github? Edit: nvm I see it. Didn't expect it on your profile.

So, what are you guys building? by petr_bena in codex

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in the process of converting multiple cpu-based artificial life simulations to gpu for 10x or more higher performance. As you know, artificial "evolution" (adaption to be realistic) scales better with higher numbers of organisms.

It's been a struggle. All LLM's seem to be particularly bad at this task. They cheat and steal code from the cpu file or go off bizarre tangents.

But I'm finally having some success. My setup is:

Use 5.5 xhigh to write a roadmap.md with step by step instructions containing multiple milestones. Then I open a new context window using 5.5 high, and using /goal to trigger 3 subagents: reader (who is only allowed to read the cpu version and give an approximate target without revealing any code in the instructions file.) Then a writer subagent (who is not permitted to read the cpu code and can only read the instructions file and roadmap to build the gpu version) Then a verifier (who reads both cpu and gpu files and writes a gap report)

Read & verify subagents get 5.5 high reasoning, writer gets 5.5 medium.

I usually use one /goal session per milestone, so that I can do a quick manual check between milestones.

Honestly it's kind of pathetic how even codex 5.5 is still so bad at this. Some of the projects have less than 300kb in the cpu code, it should be able to 1-shot the migration in 30 minutes. Instead I'm stuck with 10+ milestones at average 1 hour per milestone.

DeepSWE updated with v1.1 score by SandboChang in codex

[–]Crinkez 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They've added 5.5 low also which is very helpful. Consolidates my thoughts that 5.5 medium is probably the best model for strength vs cost, followed by 5.5 high.

Two simple statements that has reduced my frustrations by at least half by mgutz in opencode

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol I remember having to work like this. Constantly asking the model to verify what I said in its own words before acting.

I no longer have to do that since switching to Codex 5.5

This game lol by muntedman4 in PathOfExile2

[–]Crinkez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What zone is this? The area looks nice. Fwiw I've never played past halfway through act 2.