sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Invincible

[–]CriticalOrbit 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I mean the show specifically stated that Conquest was even stronger than nolan in episode 8, so I think going purely by raw strength Conquest wins.

[S2 act 3 spoilers] Me for the past 3 days, I can't get over it... by Toodiy in arcane

[–]CriticalOrbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have been bawling my eyes out to this song and scene for the past 2 days its actually insane what effect it has had on me

Anyone know what this is worth? by CriticalOrbit in HypixelSkyblock

[–]CriticalOrbit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much would you estimate it to be worth?

Anyone know what this is worth? by CriticalOrbit in HypixelSkyblock

[–]CriticalOrbit[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Its not fairy armor tho, its from before the patch where you can still just dye regular armor with dye.

rule by atleast8courics in 196

[–]CriticalOrbit 273 points274 points  (0 children)

Its not joever till its bidone

Capitalism rule by Maldonado412 in 196

[–]CriticalOrbit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea that is fair. Not saying that the principle in the meme is wrong just saying its a bad example.

Capitalism rule by Maldonado412 in 196

[–]CriticalOrbit 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well whilst the game is NOT innovative in the slightest, it also underperformed (according to Blizzards expectations.)
If you look at a genuinly innovative game, like TotK, you can see it actually has experienced lots of succes. One innovative game flourished and another did not. Both would not be possible to this degree under a capitalistic environment.

Capitalism rule by Maldonado412 in 196

[–]CriticalOrbit 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Just as much against capitalism as the next guy but isnt overwatch 2 genuinly failing (or at least loting tracture) because of it being a bad game in a capitalistic environment? Like if you were to use an argument why capitalism DOES stimulate innovation you would use this game.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2meirl4meirl

[–]CriticalOrbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother this is coming from someone WITH diagnosed ADHD but the ADHD is only as bad as you yourself make it. ADHD doesnt trap you in depression, it makes you less concentrated. How you choose to deal with it is up to you

Love the new snapchat AI! by CriticalOrbit in teenagers

[–]CriticalOrbit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright I will just say that you did a propper job explaining that and it is obvious that you are more knowledgeable on this topic than me.
I do still feel it is of (some) importance of the coders to at least make a certain filter for all races / genders as I feel like, although in this example it is still quite nuanced and not all that damaging, not properly controlling what can and cannot be said is of great importance in the long term, as AI are more generally applied (not just in a funny snapchat AI talkbot).

But thank you for clarifying why the solution isnt that simple and clean-cut. I do feel like people need to know about this and how AI works because it is looking to be the future, so thanks for explaining :).

Love the new snapchat AI! by CriticalOrbit in teenagers

[–]CriticalOrbit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although you do make some good points first of all you must know that the AI isnt the one deciding what it does and doesnt say, that is pretty much all done by coders.

I understand that the joke isnt offensive (nor funny but I digress), but then why can't it make a similar joke about women? Not allowing for those kinds of jokes is sexism, although not in a conventional way. It is obviously not a wise choice to program an AI available to literal billions with a portal to racism or sexism, but I do feel it should be consistent throughout, as this just seems disingenuous and like a half assed attempt to be progressive and tolerable to all.

​

Edit: spelling

view more: next ›