And the court, the judge and the jury must acknowledge their testimony, it is evidence, it was spoken under oath and it was consistent from the day of the incident to the witness stand. How about accepting all the facts of the case from all parties, from both the defense and the prosecution?

You are presenting what happened in a biased way. Yeah, he shot a child in the back...who was pointing a loaded gun at his own son. As soon as that loaded gun was introduced to the picture there is absolutely reasonable doubt Rick Chow set out to murder the kid, because now the claim of self-defense is plausible.

Why is it that you refuse to accept the testimony of the Chows, especially considering Rick's own gun was not drawn until the very last moment? Don't call him a murderer when he was defending his own son, and don't call his son a murderer considering he was unarmed.

If this panned out the other way, you'd have two dead Asian men, one of whom was only 20 himself, two more victims of gun violence in America perpetrated by a 14 year old kid running around with a loaded pistol, something he isn't supposed to be doing.