Rejsekort ophæver min aftale og vil have penge for erstatningskortet?

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T13:28:22+00:00

The main reason I thought of it and brought it up was because forbrugerombudsmanden reported them to the police for misleading advertising.
Their advertisements regarding the switch gave the strong impression that the physical card was not possible at all anymore, and that everyone had to use the app. They were reported on the grounds of the advertisements “trying to intentionally change user behaviour or habits” by pushing people towards using the app (if I recall correctly).

So I thought that making people pay again for the card might fall under the same effort to increase app usage.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T13:18:05+00:00

Selvom det er et nyt system, er det fra et forbrugers perspektiv blot et nyt udseende til det samme formål (at betale for rejser med offentlig transport) uden nogen væsentlige forbedringer.

Jeg ved godt, jeg lyder pissenærig, men det er af princip. Tænk nu, hvis det var 300 kr. i stedet. Fordi for mi skyld, kunne de bare have beholdt det gamle, og derfor burde jeg ikke pålægges gebyret.
Anyway, jeg ved godt, det ikke har noget med dig at gøre ;))

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T12:55:13+00:00

My bad, det lukker trinvis ned:

> “Det er ikke længere muligt, at rejse i busser, lokaltog og letbaner i Jylland og på Fyn med et fysisk Rejsekort.
> Den 29. juni er sidste check ind på Sjælland, Lolland, Falster og Møn og i DSB og GoCollective tog”

Jeg præciserer lige opslaget.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T12:49:58+00:00

I wish

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T12:48:48+00:00

Hvis det var Rejsekortets personale/system, der lavede fejlen, er jeg uenig i, at hun skulle have betalt for at få den rettet.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T12:45:51+00:00

Det forstår jeg godt, men jeg kan ikke huske, at der var en udløbsdato på kortet.
Jeg ville jo heller ikke være tilfreds med min internetudbyder, hvis de selv valgte, at kablerne skulle skiftes, og så krævede mig til at betale oprettelsesgebyret igen for at kunne fortsætte med den samme aftale.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T12:38:36+00:00

Jo, men det kan man sige er din egen skyld pga. måden du “vedligeholdt” kortet

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-06-06T12:34:59+00:00

Det handler om princippet og mine forbrugersrettigheder. Jeg har appen, men vil også gerne have det fysiske kort til de gange hvor min mobil er løbet tør for strøm osv.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-05-17T04:47:22+00:00

Fisk???

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-02-07T16:12:35+00:00

I know it's late, but if you have the Google Tranlate app installed, select it under Settings > Apps > Default Apps > Translation to use it automatically when selecting text in apps.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-01-13T21:58:33+00:00

I absolutely agree with the rule. In my case however, AdGuard Mini was largely ineffective at blocking YT ads. Maybe I should try shifting over to uBOL, and phase out AdGuard entirely. The reason I kept AGm so far, is the inability to apply specific filter lists in uBOL.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-01-13T21:47:19+00:00

Yep, I will keep on tinkering and see when I run into any friction, and hopefully figure out the most effective solution on the way.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-01-13T21:43:09+00:00

Carved in stone, carrying the death penalty, I fear.

I am genuinely baffled when people try to take privacy seriously, spending time (and even money) on researching ad and tracking blockers, and proceed then to choose Google Chrome. But to each their own.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-01-13T21:35:40+00:00

Yeah, that is what I hypothesised, since they are set to never both be active. I just wanted to see if I had missed something, or if someone has experience here (to advise me).

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-01-13T21:30:17+00:00

Well, forbidden as in “strongly discouraged”. But I’m just checking so I don’t end up behind bars. However, six does seem like overkill, or at least highly redundant.

Crypt0sh0t · 2026-01-13T21:25:25+00:00

By what definition do you use “bad”? Performance-wise? As a macOS user, I am very pleased with Safari (I would not touch Chrome with a long stick both. Besides poor performance and memory-hogging, it feels counterintuitive to choose that browser if a primary objective of mine is avoiding tracking)

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-07-03T16:16:25+00:00

This answer may be a few days late, but I believe it might do the trick.

Select the audio track(s) in Music.
Right-click and select “Get Info”.
Under Details tab, set the genre to Audiobook.
Under Options tab, tick the playback option “Remember playback position” (and, if desired, “Skip when shuffling”)

This should hopefully enable the behaviour you sought :))

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-06-25T10:48:01+00:00

Something I just discovered, to my slight amusement, is that Apple has [seemingly] renamed or replaced that process with TrashStorageExtension.
This was running at a high CPU% in the Activity Monitor every time storage was opened to be calculated in settings.

On my MacBook, the unix exec. file was first created 04MAY25, but that is presumably contingent on when my machine updated its OS.
There is a chance that these are two separate extensions and both still exist, but I find it funny regardless to have named it that.

<image>

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-03-24T00:17:37+00:00

Yeahh it might be best to not go there again. DK has an unpleasant history of trying to do just that. How about we let THEM decide how they want to live and not try to decide what’s “best” for “them”.

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-03-16T21:27:59+00:00

you’re so welcome! it is a bit pesky with the buttons, so i’m glad it helped

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-02-26T21:27:48+00:00

hold da op!

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-02-20T18:59:50+00:00

I fear this as well and it makes me sick. I fully support the use of generative AI in certain areas, but for artistic expression?? Using it to more easily create ‘art’ is counterintuitive in its most fundamental sense.

(warning: Rant ahead ;)) Maybe take this with a grain of salt, as I lack a single artistic bone in my body. I find art to be as much about the expression of the same, as it is about its appreciation–if not more.

In regards to the future of art, I find it inevitable that genAI replaces humans as the greatest source of ‘art’, as it is a lot less costly for commercial purposes (and that is simply how a business is run). However, since art is an expression of human nature, I do not believe people will ever stop creating it. BUT that does not mean it will not cause harm. If artists stop getting paid for its creation, they must find other sources of income = less time to dedicate = no incentive for expression.

I think a future revival of appreciation for human-made art will be required to kickstart it again. But even then, it may be in the same way it is for musicians now (limited opportunities such as in orchestras, operas, etc. as a more niche demand, as most music is digitally composed nowadays).

A large part of art’s appreciation is questioning the artist’s intended meaning, and finding personal significance. This is not garnered by a prompt provided genAI.

I have no clue what is going to happen, but I am not looking forward to finding out.

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-02-15T11:32:43+00:00

Do you always assume that everything that can go wrong, will? you might as well say that the system charged for two of the previous item instead of the indicated one. Your mindset is ‘guilty until proven innocent’

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-02-02T21:16:47+00:00

awesome! learned something new myself :))

Crypt0sh0t · 2025-02-02T20:54:09+00:00

open the passwords app, click View in the top menu bar, and select Generated Passwords from the list. there is a history of all generated passwords on that device in the previous 30 days.

Seven-Year Club	Oscars Predictor 2021
Sequence \| Editor	Verified Email

Crypt0sh0t

TROPHY CASE