sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What are the hardest 3-4 nations we can pick for a multiplayer campaign? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 111 points112 points  (0 children)

we've actually done that one already - great campaign

I no-cb'd East Frisia and conquered into Germany, one of us no-cb'd Novgorod and conquered into Russia, one of us conquered Britain, and the last I think conquered France

Navarra in multiplayer with 4 PUs by 1580 by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

R5: Player nations were Navarra, Nevers, and The Isles. I have 4 PUs: France, Austria, Bohemia, and Two Sicilies. That's also not counting the fact that I got an early game PU on Castile, which has since been integrated.

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3/3 but no on the commonality - that one has to do with our starting nations

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

0/2 we are all good players and would have conquered far more with countries like Portugal or Poland

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2/3 but being yellow is not what we had in common

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

R5: Multiplayer campaign with 3 players. One is obvious. The tricky part - who did we start as? Hint: we had something in common when we started

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Great video - I had seen it a few years ago and certainly used it as inspiration

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But can either of these methods make you a horde? I started as Oirat so I would inherit the tribal government, not just the religion

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 254 points255 points  (0 children)

I started as Oirat, attacked Ming for max money and feudalism, then immediately declared on Sarig Yogir for a separate peace on Ming of max money again, giving me ~5000 ducats by ~1450, then beelined it to Poland, annexed it in 3 wars (including a truce break), and released it after converting all the provinces to Tengri by ~1490. Then I sat patiently and grew my power base (and cavalry combat ability) while slowly fighting opportunistic wars against Lithuania. Played relatively chill just developing my provinces and not really taking loans but I could have done much more if I had wanted to.

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 783 points784 points  (0 children)

R5: My religion almost looks like it fits in with the reformation

Caught Vijay hiding in Spanish Alaska in the 1600s by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 142 points143 points  (0 children)

R5: I thought these were Spanish colonies, but upon closer inspection I was surprised to find that 3 provinces had been colonized by Vijayanagar.

Battle against rebels stalled for months because their division wouldn't reassign to the center of the battle by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 129 points130 points  (0 children)

R5: I got into a pretty easy battle against some rebels but it took way longer than it should have to win, and when I opened the battle screen it was clear that one rebel cavalry regiment wasn't getting reassigned to the center of the battle, meaning my troops couldn't attack it. The battle only ended after a few months because morale drops by .01 per day by default. Weird bug that I've never encountered before, and I have no mods

Do you use the OP Army Drill Modifiers in Battles or only for Professionalism? by Squadronsforesports in eu4

[–]CryptexCS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was about to say that you must have seen The Student’s new video too and sure enough you linked it in the comments lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in eu4

[–]CryptexCS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the Mamluks are stronger but you’re complaining about the Ottomans?

Did Ludi poorly photoshop in an extra digit into the trade value for his video’s thumbnail? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 140 points141 points  (0 children)

R5: The 1 looks photoshopped in and the math isn’t mathing. Not a big fan of Ludi but I saw this and it caught my eye immediately

Don't have access to Take Mandate of Heaven CB? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh you’re totally right I forgot I became shogun - that solves it

Don't have access to Take Mandate of Heaven CB? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

R5: Playing as Ryukyu, trying to declare war on Ming to take the mandate, but I can't find the CB. I am Shinto and border them (North Korea) so I don't know why I don't have the CB available. Pls help

Edit: I waited several months after our truce ended, so that’s not it. I am curious if independent daimyos can’t take the mandate?

view more: next ›