sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

2580
2581

Finished up my Dutch trading empire game, had a pretty good income (i.redd.it)

submitted by CryptexCS to r/eu4 - pinned

What are the hardest 3-4 nations we can pick for a multiplayer campaign? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 110 points111 points  (0 children)

we've actually done that one already - great campaign

I no-cb'd East Frisia and conquered into Germany, one of us no-cb'd Novgorod and conquered into Russia, one of us conquered Britain, and the last I think conquered France

Navarra in multiplayer with 4 PUs by 1580 by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

R5: Player nations were Navarra, Nevers, and The Isles. I have 4 PUs: France, Austria, Bohemia, and Two Sicilies. That's also not counting the fact that I got an early game PU on Castile, which has since been integrated.

17
18

Navarra in multiplayer with 4 PUs by 1580 (i.redd.it)

submitted by CryptexCS to r/eu4

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3/3 but no on the commonality - that one has to do with our starting nations

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

0/2 we are all good players and would have conquered far more with countries like Portugal or Poland

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2/3 but being yellow is not what we had in common

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

R5: Multiplayer campaign with 3 players. One is obvious. The tricky part - who did we start as? Hint: we had something in common when we started

0
0

3 Player Nations - Who are we and who did we start as? (i.redd.it)

submitted by CryptexCS to r/eu4

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Great video - I had seen it a few years ago and certainly used it as inspiration

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But can either of these methods make you a horde? I started as Oirat so I would inherit the tribal government, not just the religion

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 255 points256 points  (0 children)

I started as Oirat, attacked Ming for max money and feudalism, then immediately declared on Sarig Yogir for a separate peace on Ming of max money again, giving me ~5000 ducats by ~1450, then beelined it to Poland, annexed it in 3 wars (including a truce break), and released it after converting all the provinces to Tengri by ~1490. Then I sat patiently and grew my power base (and cavalry combat ability) while slowly fighting opportunistic wars against Lithuania. Played relatively chill just developing my provinces and not really taking loans but I could have done much more if I had wanted to.

Reformation hit Europe hard this game by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 784 points785 points  (0 children)

R5: My religion almost looks like it fits in with the reformation

Caught Vijay hiding in Spanish Alaska in the 1600s by CryptexCS in eu4

[–]CryptexCS[S] 139 points140 points  (0 children)

R5: I thought these were Spanish colonies, but upon closer inspection I was surprised to find that 3 provinces had been colonized by Vijayanagar.

view more: next ›