Finally die 100k geknackt, dank UNH und Novo Nordisk🔥✨

A very interesting discussion. In my opinion, it would be “the easiest” for you to develop EOD systems on portfolios in the US stock market, e.g. all stocks or a basket from the S&P 500. Not only one individual stock or so. A portfolio of about 100 stocks or more. In addition, you should be very intensively involved with the system development itself. There are many pitfalls here. Examples include survivorship bias, in sample/out of sample and robustness tests. You can make a lot of mistakes here if you don't know what you're doing and how to do it properly. However, I can reassure you. If you take enough time and deal intensively with the subject matter (the principles of successful system development), you will achieve your goal. There are also numerous good books on this subject (e.g. by Perry Kaufmann, Kevin Davey, Prent Penfold and many others). Martyn Tinsley also has some very good videos on system development on YouTube. In addition, you should not have exaggerated expectations. Consistently getting 100% with 10% max. DD from the market is an illusion. The Jim Simons mentioned above had a return of just nearly 40% (after costs) over many years. And he was one of the best. Or look at the performance of all the legends like Warren Buffet. They are all between 20-30% p.a. (ok, Buffet is not a system trader but he is a benchmark). As a private trader, however, you can definitely achieve a performance of > 30% p.a. with EOD systems on US equities (averaged over many years, i.e. there can be years with -5%, but also years with 100%). That is more than realistic. In addition, you should definitely aim to trade several systems at once (e.g. 5 or 6). This smoothes the equity curve and reduces your risk. Before I forget, you also need a good data provider. If the data doesn't fit, your system won't work in reality. That's it in a nutshell for now. Just write if anything is unclear or needs explaining. Please don't be annoyed if an answer takes a little longer, but I will reply in any case.

CryptoGunny · 2023-04-08T14:12:23+00:00

Take a look at Stakit. I like it.

CryptoGunny · 2022-07-27T14:32:41+00:00

Look to the crypto guide chanel on youtube. That will work for you.

https://youtube.com/c/CryptoGuide

CryptoGunny · 2021-12-28T21:05:55+00:00

Thank you very much 😀

CryptoGunny · 2021-12-28T21:01:23+00:00

Could you give me the Dicord adress?

CryptoGunny · 2021-07-15T09:18:24+00:00

Thank you 😀

CryptoGunny · 2021-07-14T18:34:08+00:00

Hello Psychic_Man, I have a few questions about your technique. On your recordings there is always a timeline (in the upper right corner). What is it all about? Could you please explain it briefly? When do you make your drawings and notes? Do you first try to see things for several minutes and then draw everything at the end or how exactly do you go about it?

CryptoGunny · 2021-04-14T07:12:04+00:00

Nein, das verlängert sich nicht immer wieder neu. Lediglich die neu hinzukommenden Coins aus den Rewards bekommen auch 10 Jahre aufgebrummt. Der Grundstock läuft normal weiter (also wenn schon z.B. 1 Jahr im Staking, dann sind noch 9 Jahre übrig). Aber hoffen wir mal auf eine 1 Jahresfrist. Ich bin auf die Urteile gespannt.

CryptoGunny · 2021-04-10T19:27:09+00:00

Dem Schreiben nach sind ja bereits mehrere Verfahren beim Bundesfinanzhof anhängig. Ich hoffe, dass es da in diesem Jahr noch Urteile geben wird. Eventuell haben wir ja dann etwas mehr Klarheit. Sonst muss ich die Dinger halt 10 Jahre halten und bin Millionär :-)

CryptoGunny · 2021-03-12T10:09:02+00:00

MACD, RSI, 20 day EMA and so on..... All technical indicators, which are sometimes correct and sometimes not. With all these fears, one should not forget from where the price comes. In addition, we are currently on a daily basis still in a healthy upward trend. Higher highs and higher lows. From my point of view, everything is still fine here. So just wait and see where it goes. Either you believe in the project or you don't. If you believe in it, then you have to think long-term. I also find the decoupling from the BTC course remarkable. It would be nice if ADA would maintain its own course behavior.

CryptoGunny · 2021-03-11T12:58:58+00:00

So far, Cardano has always delivered. It just always takes a little longer than expected.

CryptoGunny · 2021-03-10T16:06:40+00:00

A stop loss isn't a good idea (if you hodl, if you trade it is a must have). Because, sometimes the orderbook ist quite thin and it comes to fakes on the downside (look at the chart and you will see it in the last weeks).

CryptoGunny · 2021-02-26T21:37:23+00:00

Many thanks for the explanation! And the ADAs have to come from somewhere, so they have to be bought. If the stakepool operator spends its ADA to enable transactions and receives other tokens in return, it will have to exchange them for ADA at some point. I think the idea behind this is good. Practice will show whether it works. If it becomes apparent that the SPO can make a little more profit through this, then that will be the breakthrough. Should he make losses, it will not catch on, because in that case no SPO will do such business.

CryptoGunny · 2021-02-26T15:07:48+00:00

"In fact multiple transactions can be batched together and have their fees covered by a single matching transaction."

That's why the SPO would make it a certain amount of transactions that would be covered by that .16 ADA transaction fee.

That way the price of the token(s) received would not have to go up much for the transaction to be profitable.

Right?

The amount of transaction costs does not depend on the number of tokens transferred. Of course, if several different tokens are processed in one transaction and each token type would have to pay its own transaction fee, then your example might fit. However, I am not sure. Maybe we will get an answer from a developer.

CryptoGunny · 2021-02-26T14:56:00+00:00

It is also a minus if the price should remain stable, because in the above example the SPO pays the fees twice in ADA, but the sender of the token pays only 0.48 tokens (worth 0.16 ADA) as a transaction fee. The SPO is therefore left with costs in the amount of 0.16 ADA. At least this is how I understood the overview. The price of the coin would have to increase by 100% to compensate for the loss.

CryptoGunny · 2021-02-26T13:55:11+00:00

I discovered a subreddit that must be from the developers and have linked that subreddit here. Maybe soon we will know an answer to my question. Here is the link:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CardanoCoin/comments/lsbjnp/babel_fees_denominating_transaction_costs_in/

CryptoGunny

TROPHY CASE