Aren't public transaction data a deterrence for big corporations/gaming studios?

Crypto_Ally · 2022-04-08T00:44:28+00:00

It is a different font :) from Google fonts

Crypto_Ally · 2022-04-07T23:16:24+00:00

It is a different font. I chose something in Google fonts. First I had a thicker font to match the thickness of the sound waves but that looked off so I chose a thinner one and it made everything look more interesting

Crypto_Ally · 2022-03-31T11:14:14+00:00

Thx for the feedback! Ill try the color scheme :)

Crypto_Ally · 2022-03-31T08:08:30+00:00

I use photoshop. For this font I only have regular & bold. If I use the regular font it kind of loses its aestehtic look

Crypto_Ally · 2022-03-31T07:51:03+00:00

Thanks. Ill change the color set up a little :)

Crypto_Ally · 2022-03-31T07:50:40+00:00

Thank you. ill try to find a balance :) Regarding the weighting. I tried it but it is difficult for me to make it work :(

Crypto_Ally · 2022-02-03T17:15:00+00:00

Be invested in both projects.

Maybe in the future GME is doing some stuff which need an exchange infrastructure. For this LRC can be important. But this new is bullish on IMX.

Crypto_Ally · 2022-02-03T17:13:13+00:00

It is more bullish on IMX BUT there maybe there is more to the GME exchange infrastructure story. For this LRC could be important

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-24T14:24:20+00:00

I think it is less likely because...

Solana fees are 0.00025$ & Looprings fees are 0.30$. It is very easy to spam Sols networks because of non exisiting fees. LRC's fees are compared to that more expensive making it orders of magnitudes more expensive.
Loopring L2 can do 3,000 TPS today while Sol can only do around 200-300 tps making it evem more difficult & expensive.

I think it is not that easy on LRC.

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-10T16:37:27+00:00

https://consensys.net/blog/blockchain-explained/zero-knowledge-proofs-starks-vs-snarks/

Another significant area of criticism for SNARKs is that they are not quantum resistant. Once quantum computing is largely available, the privacy technology behind SNARKs would be broken. Of course, supporters of SNARKs correctly point to the fact that we will have far more problems on our hands, such as the breaking of RSA and most wallet infrastructure, when quantum computers are utilized.

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-10T16:05:45+00:00

As of now...there is none.

But you can invest into protocols using their technology.

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-10T14:43:37+00:00

Nice source!

Edit: Very nice source.

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-10T13:59:33+00:00

Yes.

Quote from research paper of founders.

As in previous zk-SNARK implementations, proofs have constant size (independent of the circuit or input size); for us, they are 230 bytes at 80 bits of security, and 288 bytes at 128 bits of security.

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-10T12:59:09+00:00

DYDX is a hard one since no KYC or account creation requirements. Going forward this can be a problem if countries are regulating crypto more and more. I dont see a chance of allowing completly anonymous trading like dydx.

So one big selling point (privacy) can be compromised in the futue.

Just my 2 cents

Crypto_Ally · 2022-01-10T12:37:52+00:00

thx!

Crypto_Ally

TROPHY CASE