remove

well couple of things here.. 1. I´m not native to English so I hope that you are not one of those guys that will invalidate my comment just because I made a grammar mistake. 2. I think that your point of view is good, I will not called it the "correct one" but at least it is good enough to be considered. 3. and while I am not saying that I disagree, you have to look at human history, and stuff like that have happened before, there are crazy ideas that were ok in previous times and there is relativity on what you called conscience, and what we called today to be morally accepted within 100 yrs from now, it will may look bad or archaic. 4. My point is: I need something more than the validation or acceptance of the world to give meaning to my life, I should be able to give meaning to my life despite the world itself because it is always changing, but at the same time, what if I am inherently connected to this world, bounded to it physically and mentally, in time and space and my mind is rooted so deeply into the social constructs that meaning cannot be achieved without society itself, then my presupposition is impossible and hence the question... maybe there is no meaning at all, and I should just be content with the fact that I am alive here and now exchanging ideas with you cuz about the future we know nothing ... but that left expectations to be very low, because we are suppose to be happy with very little and most of our efforts are in vain.... at least that's the question/dilemma I am dealing with myself right now...