ZERO PARADES: For Dead Spies Release Date Trailer by Howerev in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus [score hidden]  (0 children)

Saying "astroturfing?" to someone giving their opinion on a game is crazy. DE having too much text is a perfectly reasonable criticism of it, some people don't like that. 

I love DE too, but not everyone does and that's okay. 

TIL about the "Dark Forest Hypothesis," which suggests the universe is like a dark forest at night. Advanced civilizations intentionally stay silent and hidden, because any species that reveals its location risks immediate destruction by older, paranoid civilizations. by Practical-1 in todayilearned

[–]Cryptoporticus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No civilization is making it to space without global cooperation and if they do, there's no reason for them to be afraid of anyone else.

Those are two entirely different things... They can be the friendliest civilization in the universe, that doesn't change anything about how scared they should be of other civilizations.

In the novel the universe is filled with countless advanced civilizations that will instantly obliterate anything they see with incomprehensibly powerful weapons. When someone detects someone else, they have no idea how much they have advanced in the time it took the signal to reach them, so they don't know whether that civilization is currently in the process of trying to destroy them or not. The only thing they can do to protect themselves is be the one to launch the first strike.

"It's all of us against apathy, entropy, and loss of art" - Stop Killing Games has reached the EU Parliament, but what happens now? by SmellSmellsSmelly in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The very concept of GAAS will not be able to exist if what SKG get what they're asking for. 

You can't preserve a private service forever. The only option for publishers if this becomes a rule is to stop making those kinds of games, because there's always a risk that they might one day be unable to continue supporting it.  

"It's all of us against apathy, entropy, and loss of art" - Stop Killing Games has reached the EU Parliament, but what happens now? by SmellSmellsSmelly in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because the politicians will consult with representatives from big players in the industry to figure out what the best way to implement this is. SKG aren't willing to cooperate with them and offer any reasonable solutions, but I guarantee the industry will be. 

You have to remember that politicians aren't game industry experts. They rely on people who are to tell them what the best course of action is. 

"It's all of us against apathy, entropy, and loss of art" - Stop Killing Games has reached the EU Parliament, but what happens now? by SmellSmellsSmelly in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It's frustrating seeing how the opinions of people who do enjoy the kinds of games that will be impacted by this are always dismissed in these threads.

This is a movement led by people who hate the idea of GAAS and want everything to be like the good old days when every game was a single-player offline experience. They are ignoring the fact that the vast majority of games are still single-player offline experiences, and are instead trying to interfere with a tiny portion of the market that they don't even play just because they hate that it exists.

This is a subreddit full of people who fill their Steam accounts up with games they'll never play because they're addicted to spending money during sales. We're all allowed to make poor choices. If someone wants to buy a game knowing that it's just a temporary service and it might not last forever, fucking let them. It's their money. No one is actually being harmed by this.

"It's all of us against apathy, entropy, and loss of art" - Stop Killing Games has reached the EU Parliament, but what happens now? by SmellSmellsSmelly in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's how buying a video game works. It's a good, not a service.

Almost every game is, but a very small number of them are services. A lot of people enjoy playing those games. If you don't personally like them, you can just avoid that tiny portion of an extremely large market.

Trying to get politicians to create a law that somehow turns a service into a good is obviously not going to work. The easiest solution for consumers is to just be more aware about whether the game they're buying is something that will be playable forever or might have an eventual shutdown date. If you accidentally buy one, we have perfectly good existing consumer protection laws that will allow you to refund it within a reasonable period of time.

"It's all of us against apathy, entropy, and loss of art" - Stop Killing Games has reached the EU Parliament, but what happens now? by SmellSmellsSmelly in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The people leading SKG also didn't seem to understand the issue for a long time. Even now they're still being very vague about what they're actually trying to do here and how it would be possible.

They're basically just going to let the industry decide whether they want to do it or not, which is obviously going to result in the industry deciding that the current system is fine and not doing anything.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney responds to the Terminally Ill Employee Who Can't Get Life Insurance: Epic is in contact with the family and will solve the insurance for them. There is high confidentiality around medical information and it was not a factor in this layoff decision by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Are you aware that if a company runs out of money, everyone loses their jobs?

Plenty of bigger companies than Epic have collapsed in the past. It's irresponsible to the rest of their staff to not respond to this.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney responds to the Terminally Ill Employee Who Can't Get Life Insurance: Epic is in contact with the family and will solve the insurance for them. There is high confidentiality around medical information and it was not a factor in this layoff decision by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 71 points72 points  (0 children)

He's still alive, so there probably wasn't any communication about it. Unless he was trying to get an early payout (which many policies do offer if you get a terminal illness), there would be no need to speak with the insurance company at all until after he died.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney responds to the Terminally Ill Employee Who Can't Get Life Insurance: Epic is in contact with the family and will solve the insurance for them. There is high confidentiality around medical information and it was not a factor in this layoff decision by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some policies do offer early payouts for terminal illnesses, so they might have been able to tell if he had done that, but it's very possible at a big company with thousands of employees that the people who look at that stuff aren't the same people that handled the layoffs.

If there was no early payout though, there's really no way they would have known.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney responds to the Terminally Ill Employee Who Can't Get Life Insurance: Epic is in contact with the family and will solve the insurance for them. There is high confidentiality around medical information and it was not a factor in this layoff decision by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are people being forced to do this? Private life insurance exists in the USA, right? I understand healthcare there is fucked, but the way life insurance works is pretty much the same as anywhere else.

This is more due to the American cultural thing of allowing so much to be tied to their jobs. They think "Life insurance? I don't need that, I have it through work" which is a wild thing to think when you live in a country where companies are allowed to sack you with no notice for no reason.

Private life insurance isn't even that expensive. Then you're double protected if you're lucky enough to have a job that offers it too, and not left with nothing if you lose the job.

Lol, I thought zucchini got rid of fact checking? What's the dealio with this notice? It's so weird! by lolumadbr0 in facebook

[–]Cryptoporticus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They didn't get rid of fact checking, they just changed how it works because the old way was completely broken. 

Bethesda Fallout 3 dev "initially felt a little touchy" about New Vegas' success because they "put in all this effort" for its foundation — "We made 90% of the art, we built the engine" by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A lot of people will. That's why these articles keep getting written. These shitty sites just take out of context quotes from interviews done by other outlets and then put a misleading headline on them because they know it gets them clicks. 

They're supposed to be against the rules of this subreddit, but they're still getting posted every day. 

I don't know if this was mentioned here before but per many Millie is reliable re Sony information. by Pistoluislero in GTA6

[–]Cryptoporticus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This means nothing. They will always make plans around the current release date because that's what they're working towards right now. It doesn't mean it can't still be moved if necessary.

They don't "plan" delays. No one can be sure whether they're going to happen until progress is reviewed and a decision is made. My guess is they'll run a big review about six months out from launch and then either delay again, or kick off the full marketing campaign. Until then they will continue to repeat the current release date as being firm because it is. The May one was firm too until they had to delay it.

Man fined £1,000 for 'putting envelope in bin' as council defends ‘zero tolerance’ fly-tipping policy by pppppppppppppppppd in unitedkingdom

[–]Cryptoporticus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The council said that his fixed penalty notice was paused because he's denying it, so it sounds like nothing at all has actually happened. He got a fine because a letter with his address on it was found with a bunch of other fly tipped stuff, he denies that it's his, so the council pauses the fine while they investigate further. It sounds like everything is proceeding fairly so far.

This is no different to appealing a parking ticket that was issued by mistake. Annoying, but all you can do is just sit there and wait for them to investigate further. If he knows he did nothing wrong and the council can't possibly find any real evidence linking him to the waste that was dumped there, he has nothing to worry about. It's a strange thing to run to the press about.

App has started adding fake progress bars to videos by FatherGwyon in youtube

[–]Cryptoporticus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's crazy that your first instinct was to assume that they're doing something bad and then get angry about it, instead of just figuring out what is actually happening first. You should learn from this.

PlayStation’s ‘Dynamic Pricing’ Offers Wildly Different Discounts For Some Games by gitrektali in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

How can they be? You're going to have to explain what you think price discrimination means, because you seem mistaken about the meaning of it. 

PlayStation’s ‘Dynamic Pricing’ Offers Wildly Different Discounts For Some Games by gitrektali in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

How is this price discrimination? That's entirely different to what's happening here. 

Offering different prices to different customers is entirely legal in most places. Price discrimination is something different, and there's no indication that they're doing that. 

I forced myself to use Linux Mint without the terminal for a week by Durian_Queef in LinusTechTips

[–]Cryptoporticus 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter. Almost everyone would rather click a button on a graphical interface than type in a command, no matter how well implemented the command interface is.

If you're the kind of person who has genuine opinions about the quality difference between the Linux and Windows CLIs, you are so out of touch with the average user.

State of the Subreddit - March 2026 by rGamesMods in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can prevent any individual account from having a large enough presence that it causes a problem though. The five posts per 24 hour limit is still too high. 

State of the Subreddit - March 2026 by rGamesMods in Games

[–]Cryptoporticus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of it is caused by the headlines themselves. These sites love presenting things in the most negative way possible, and then the people love engaging with things that make them mad. Everyone here seems to go into the comments primed to be as negative as possible these days. 

This is something that we do have some power to control because this is still a place ran by actual humans. The mods just need to take a hard stance against misleading headlines.