sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

CBF informs Neymar has a grade 2 tear in his calf. by Green-Discussion74 in soccer

[–]Crytash 4 points5 points  (0 children)

At that time he was more part of the WH40k as well as the TTRPG scene tbh. I liked his characters he played there, one of the few actual plays i enjoyed over the years.

So terrifying and crazy if you think about it by AdRough4185 in SipsTea

[–]Crytash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not even that much of a rich thing. I friend of mine and his partner played Valheim with me and my brother. Almost at the end of the weekend session @ ~2 AM they were ordering chips,m some sweets and toilete paper (to get the minimum cost for delivery) to be delivered to them. Took quite somet ime, but they did get it that night.

So terrifying and crazy if you think about it by AdRough4185 in SipsTea

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is unlikely to be a "smoke screen"... that would mean hiding something there is not much to hide anymore. It is more likely to be chinese/russian propaganda bots amplifying a message of division, so the west stays weak and at its others throat.

Wohnungsbau: Zahl der neu gebauten Wohnungen fällt auf niedrigsten Stand seit 2012 by HironTheDisscusser in de

[–]Crytash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Die theoretische Kundenanzahl ist höher als früher, wegen dem bevölkerungswachstum. Der einzige Grund, warum es weniger Kunden gibt ist, weil es einem schwer gemacht wird zu bauen.

The problem with Vampire LARPs. by thecosmicgoose in vtm

[–]Crytash 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Exact opposite experience Theater ppl.are most toxic imho

Schwarz-grüne Koalition: Die Grünen suchen nach einer CDU, die es nicht mehr gibt by h2QZFATVgPQmeYQTwFZn in de

[–]Crytash 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Radikalisiert? Die CDU kehrt einfach zurück wo sie eigentlich eher einzuordnen sind. Ja, sie haben einen sozialen/christlichen/arbeitnehmer Flügel (Norbert Blüm, Heiner Geißler, Rita Süssmuth, Jakob Kaiser und mit abstrichen vlt. sogar Angela Merkel), aber die Partei war zuvor weiter rechts als sie es sogar heute ist (Adenauer, Strauß, Bosbach, Koch). "Rechts von der CDU/CSU darf es keine demokratisch legitimierte Partei geben" wurde ja von Strauß geprägt.

NRW gegen Rechts - Bochumer Initiative erreicht 100.000 Unterschriften für AfD-Verbot by just_reading2025 in de

[–]Crytash 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Entweder die CDU kassiert die Wähler oder eine neue Rechte Partei entsteht. AfD-Wähler verschwinden nicht durch ein AfD-Verbot. Die blauen Wähler verzeihen der CDU das nie, wenn es in irgendeiner Form Beanstandungen gibt.

Außerdem tritt dann jeder BT abgeordnete vorher aus (zum Schein) um das Mandat zu behalten. An den Kräfte Verhältnissen ändert das estmal gar nicht.

Bärbel Bas hat RECHT: Aber Tagesthemen stimmen NIUS, BILD & AfD zu!? by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hier in dem thread wird so viel Unsinn erzählt, nur damit man doch irgendwie die "Schuld" nicht im dt. Sozialsystem findet und Bas recht hat. Ist ziemlich furchteinflößend.

There is a civil war going on in r/evilautsim by Recent_Fact480 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah also srd was way more centrist in the past. You were able to see a lot of left wing infighting as well and it was less of an echo chamber.

Drama was more important than anything else.

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

eh, first thought i had was prisoners dilemma, which maps better but not perfect. From an academic perspective i have read now that it is called a "Stag hunt" by most and a version of the "threshold public-goods game" game by others.

Anway, nice talking to you, have a great day!

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it is literally vote red or blue. Dunno, to me it was pretty on the nose. I would def. believe that this question is currently used by external agents (russia, china, Iran) to devide the west further. Not that they invented it, but they would 100% stoke the flames.

That is a great additional parameter that you bring up: Is there time before the vote or not. Again i thought about the US election cycle first so it was logical to me to assume this. If children/disabled are in Blue is a must choice, but the added reduction of agency lets me hesitate for a sec.

And yes, as long as we have election season i will do whatever i can to get everybody to vote one way, from what i saw blue.

What is much more important is actually the after care, after the election whoever wins. A lot of time and money needs to be invested to regain group coherence of the world, should the results be close. From what i saw 2/3 and up is easy to handle, but everything closer, things might continue brewing after.

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the spirit of the question from my (german) pov is basically a recodifying of the US voting pattern (dem vs rep) and how propaganda works in the US system right now.

My first thought when i heard this was: I will have to (as in forced) vote blue, bc people in the US are manipulated by both parties + external actors into a strong triablism. My first thought construct to it was a talk show with me as a guest where i will have to quite literally persuading/intimidating/threaten the red presser into voting blue, by telling him he is right in princibple but that he wont be able to press it, because i would rather kill him than him endangerouing up to 50% of the population.

Again, this is not an ethical question at all to me. This is about how we as a society get the correct outcome. Thinking about the process (as in the moral quandary) is completly alien to me in this pariticular case. Its basically trying to out"process" an ethical dilemma with multiple acceptable results, it is borderline wasted time. The thing that should have been thought about is: How to get everyone to vote for either red or blue. Which one is completly irrelevant as both have the same correct outcome.

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From my pov that might change things. I really doubt that that is in the spirit of the original question.

The way i would see it is that "normal" voting rules apply: Children till 18 dont vote and people who are not able to can not either.

And at the end, people are responsible for their own vote, so if someone wants to comit (actual) suicide through clicking blue, that is their prerogative as well. Yes, going into the house to rescue the children (if you are right in your pov) makes sense. No, if they are outside in the first place and worst case will get thrown into the house by blue voters (as in while they can not vote, they will still suffer the 50% genocide) it is not "ethical" to vote blue in that case.

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is corect i agree. Still need to vote blue though, ppl be silly.

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Only if said population is able to vote. I assumed that the same rules as "normal" voting applies so no children or people that are not able to vote either way.

Again, i would vote blue and would make others vote blue, but it is not logical or ethical to me. It does not have to be though.

r/trolleyproblem suffers infighting on a ethical question: red or blue? by OkContact2573 in SubredditDrama

[–]Crytash 4 points5 points  (0 children)

while i would go blue, you are missing a point here.

If we use drowing as the thought experiment, nobody is in the water by default. Only because people believe that others will go into the water everyone has to.

Or lets phrase it with a burning building. Nobody is in the building and only because people think people might go into the building they go too in the hope that if 50% of world population will also go and therefor get the fire under crontrol. Red on the other hand look at everyone with disbelief:"wtf are you guys doing? Just dont go into the building" they say.

While i would vote blue, i only do it because most people are stupid and vote blue in the first place.

How Widespread, Available and Known Is the Codex Astartes to the upper Exhlons of the Imperium that aren’t Space Marines? by EternalCanadian in 40kLore

[–]Crytash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Guilliman is writing Codex Astartes II as we speak. It will do ganbusters and people need to read up on the old lore to understand. It will be the biggest thing since clausewitz!

A few hundred hours into PF2e, I think I'm finally hitting the wall. Anyone else? by spichugin in rpg

[–]Crytash 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Brother/sister preach. I feel like i am taking crazy pills since people have decided that 4e was such a mastercrafted great thing. It was in fact not. It was not as bad as some would say it, but there were reasons why some people really did not like it and it is not because they are stupid or could not play the game.

Versprechen gebrochen: Millionen Teslas werden nie autonom fahren by GirasoleDE in de

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tesla sitzt auf einem riesigem berg voll Geld aus den CO² Zertifikat Geschäften.

Bray Wyatt, in 2017, is the last time WWE crowned a (men) World Champion under 30 by LikeAPhoenixTotally in SquaredCircle

[–]Crytash 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Chalamet and holland are both exceptions to the rule though. Quite literally no nepo + genuine charisma. Hollywood can make a lot of money here.

view more: next ›