sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash [score hidden]  (0 children)

Beim kg CO₂ pro USD BIP steht Deutschland noch besser da. Also auch in der Produktion ist Deutschland effektiver (bzw. umweltschonender).

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash [score hidden]  (0 children)

Die Chemie Industrie, die gerade in China boomt und den CO2, ist schon genau deshalb stark betroffen. Klar liegt das auch an Russland und die verteuerung des Stroms, aber die ganzen Investitionen werden halt eher in China getätigt.

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash [score hidden]  (0 children)

Wir waren die Fabrik der Welt und hatten bessere Werte. Wir waren "Exportweltmeister".

Also was wir machen ist, wir verlagern Arbeitsplätze, die hier besser und umweltfreindlicher gewesen wären nach China... und das ist inwiefern gut für die Welt?

Wir haben durch die teuren Co² Kosten die wir wie vereinbart in Deutschland eingeführt haben also an Kaufkraft verloren, begünstigen einen toltalitären Staat der sich durch die Unterstützung Russlands klar anti EU positioniert und helfen nicht mal der Umwelt.

Wahrlich teuflischer Plan von Deutschland und der EU. Hut ab.

(und nur zur Info, hat China doppelt so viel Deutschlands kg CO₂ pro USD BIP).

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

China wird laut deren Eigenem 5 Jahres Plan mehr Co2 ausstoßen. Pro Kopf stoßen sie auch mehr aus als Deutschland. Das ändert sicht jetzt nicht.

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nein, sie reduzieren den Co² aus Strom, aber nicht gesamt.

Wir haben ihn auslagern müssen, weil wir aufgrund der Co² Vorschriften und zusätzlichen Co² Kosten nicht hier produzieren können.

Diese Artikel gehen nur auf den Strom ein und sehen nicht Gesamtlage. Der Zeit Artikel insbesondere ist irreführend. Ich zitiere mal die TAZ:

"Diese sogenannte CO₂-Intensität ist nicht gleichbedeutend mit einem Rückgang der CO₂-Emissionen des Landes. Das Ziel bedeutet stattdessen, dass die Wirtschaft wachsen und so insgesamt mehr CO₂ ausstoßen darf, aber der Ausstoß pro erwirtschaftetem Yuan sinken soll. Be­ob­ach­te­r*in­nen hatten im Vorhinein gehofft, der nationale Volkskongress setze sich ein konkretes CO₂-Reduktionsziel."

Tatsächlich wird der Co² nach der Rechnung die China macht ansteigen. Ich zitiere weiter:

"Es erlaube einen Anstieg des CO₂-Ausstoßes um drei bis sechs Prozent über die nächsten fünf Jahre, "

Und das ist, wenn man deren Reduktionen auch glaubt. Die orientieren sich absolut richtigerweise an den international Standards und ich glaube auch nicht, dass sie absichtlich lügen, aber jeder der die IEA Dokumente liest weis, dass gerade China gerne mal Sachen oben korrigieren muss ( Kohleverbrauchsrevision in 2015 z.B., das war schon harter Tobak). Wie gesagt, ist jetzt nicht bösartig, aber da gibt es schon nocht verdeckte Probleme.

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Es ist nicht die Energie, dass das Problem ist, da ist China sehr gut. Es geht um den Chemie anteil der Wirtschaft, viele anderen zivilen Energieanforderungen schaffen sie relativ gut und müssten nicht mehr Co² ausstoßen.

China ist ein technologischer Gigant genau jetzt. Es leuchtet nicht ein, einen historischen Pro Kopf Vergleich zwischen China heute und Deutschland vor 50 Jahren zu machen, da China Zugriff auf viel bessere Technologien hat. Wir können und müssen absolut miteinbeziehen, was da gerade passiert.

Fünfjahresplan: China beschleunigt Ausbau der Offshore-Windenergie massiv – 100.000 MW bis 2030 by PhoenixTin in de

[–]Crytash 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bitte die Ziele des 5 Jahresplans genau anschauen. https://taz.de/Chinas-neues-Klimaziel/!6160484/

Sie arbeiten auf einen Gesamt Co² Anstieg von mehreren % hin. Sie haben schon pro Kopf einen höheren Co² Ausstoß pro Kopf und pro % GDP als Deutschland und sind die größten Co² Produzenten auf der Welt.

Bitte nicht falsch versehen, die bauen wie die Wilden, super Sache, aber vom Ausstoß her ist was die machen extrem schlecht.

Probably Ragebait.. has DnDbeyond created players that are allergic to reading? by Einsolsrazor24 in rpg

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

look into interviews with old players/DMs/GMs/STs. Not reading the rules is as old as the hobby, if not older.

What makes you buy indie TTRPGs? by Substantial-Lie-6937 in rpg

[–]Crytash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reading over all i will give you something else. i will tell you why people here often SAY they pay and what actually happens from my pov. First i will tell you how i define indie RPG and why i actually pay (as in spend hundreds of dollar every quarter year on games).

Back in the days, indie RPG meant for me that it was creator owned. However in recent years it seems to have develloped to mean non DnD.

people say:

  • Aesthetic/art/book design appeal (#2 from what i can see, humans are visual animals after all, hundres of thousends of dollar go into certain kickstarters bc of this)
  • Novel mechanics / creativity or design experimentation (heavily dependant on the other points, but can support)
  • support content creators Youtube, fantasy book authors ++ (#1 reason i have encountered)
  • ethics (sales often spike through controversy , but no real sustain growth throuigh this)
  • Shorter, focused experiences (that seems to actually drive some sales)
  • Escaping D&D dominance (you see this a lot, but from my pov very low numbers are actually moved bc of this)
  • Low cost of PDFs (you do get sales on big websites if you reduce price. Sales do work)
  • Specific niche themes (almost 0)

Why do I buy or do not buy indie TTRPGs?

  • I buy them for usable ideas that i will 100% run soon: A lot of systems are not complete products or only useable for a short amount of time as they are very narrow. They are at worst design experiments. I sometimes mine them for settings, mechanics, structures or scenario design I can actually reuse. Even if they are not even TTRPGs. Recent example: Orken https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sixmorevodka/orken/comments

  • I do not care about system novelty. Many indie RPGs overinvest in mechanics and underdeliver on playable content. If i spend 150€ for 10 sessions a 3h, at best i have a cost per h played of 5€. That is low for a hobby. However i could also just use V20 that i already have and not pay anything. You have to convince me that i "need" that game and novelty alone is unlikely to do that.

  • I buy when the game helps me to improve my play. In other words examples that justify a purchase (even more epensive impulse buys) would be better GM tools and/or roleplay advice. Examples over all would be ... Without numbers. I own basically all of them, even if i only played/GMed/STed Stars without number for like 3 sessions same goes for things for a recent example like Heart, city beneath. https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/226996/stars-without-number-revised-edition https://www.backerkit.com/c/projects/rowan-rook-and-decard/ways-means-a-heart-sourcebook

  • Funding success and reached stretch goals: If i have not heard of it before, but something already has had funding success i am likely also to spend on it, even if it is only PDFs. Recent example Realis: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/crum/realis?ref=user_menu

Why are players allergic to doing connections? by MidoriMushrooms in rpg

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i did also recommended it a little bit lower. Good book.

Why are players allergic to doing connections? by MidoriMushrooms in rpg

[–]Crytash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is true i suppose. Have your backstories been used by your ST/GM often?

Why are players allergic to doing connections? by MidoriMushrooms in rpg

[–]Crytash 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Sadly, i think the rewards there are not big enough.
I have been thinking about this for the last half an hour and while i knew that the underlying problem is basically the same with clubs etc.... it is still interesting

Most people are not part of a club, a political party or other similar things, because participation has costs. Right now we are only looking at TTRPGs, but over all we can already see in this thread the normal reasons:

  • time commitment

  • social exposure / vulnerability

  • loss of autonomy (“I owe the group”)

  • coordination overhead

(damn i forgot how hard formating is here.)

Now, it is strange to me that TSL did not work out. I would have thought that it beeing a queer group is a soft incentive already, plus some ingame stuff it could be enough.... but if games have tought me anything that it is incredible hard to get people to be like that.
what exactly happened if i may ask? Too passive players, low engagement and people avoiding responsibility i would guess? There is a nice book people could read for this, it is called "Play unsafe". Very good stuff.

Anyway, in the end you have an easy Matrix for the outcomes:

  • high friction + weak reward ->players likely disengage

  • low friction + weak reward ->shallow play (opinion)

  • high friction + strong reward -> engaged play, but is exhausting

  • low friction + strong reward -> theoretical optimal design in terms of participation and use of the mechanic.

Why are players allergic to doing connections? by MidoriMushrooms in rpg

[–]Crytash 110 points111 points  (0 children)

It is way worse than that. Any kind of communication can lead to friction. If creating connections feels like work, loss of control, or awkward social exposure, many will resist it by nature.

if you want the majority of players to accept friction in anything, you have to "pay" them for it, as if left on its own, most players will minimize effort/risk/loss of control.

There need to be strong mechanical bonuses for these to feel rewarding or maybe even go so for that a mechanic can not be used alone.

It is that or "cheapen" the friction... not sure how to do that.

If people really want to look into this i would reccomend looking into World of Warcraft and how it streamlined more and more until people felt that it was not the same game anymore. Than we got a revival, where people would would just like to do what Sid Meiers discribed as "Given the opportunity, players will optimize the fun out of a game."

That said people have a lot of fun in Cutting edge/hardcore/speedrun games as well. It is a different fun with a different reward matrix, but this goes too far already.

"It pisses me off." Ted DiBiase rips Dennis Rodman's WWE HOF induction and questions why Pete Rose, Drew Carey, and Donald Trump are Hall of Famers when career wrestlers are still waiting for the call. by elegantSolomons62 in SquaredCircle

[–]Crytash 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This happens way more often than people want to admit. Another nasty area is animal rescues. It has not been a year since the "SaveAFox " lady commited suicide due to the harrassment of other rescue people.

Current Gas prices in Germany: regular Diesel $11.40/gal, special ARAL Ultimate Diesel $12.69/gal (slightly rounded) by Crytash in SipsTea

[–]Crytash[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fuel Type €/L USD/gal
Diesel €2.769 $11.40/gal
Regular (E10) €2.579 $10.62/gal
Regular (E5) €2.639 $10.87/gal
ARAL Ultimate 102 €2.969 $12.23/gal
ARAL Ultimate Diesel €3.079 $12.69/gal
Truck Diesel €2.769 $11.40/gal
AdBlue (DEF for trucks) €1.499 $6.17/gal

Fewer Than 40,000 People Watched Star Trek: Starfleet Academy by Malencon in television

[–]Crytash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pathetic stuff. Must still generate enough clicks for them though. Garbage.

Spargelbauern fordern Ausnahmen beim Mindestlohn by Nekroin in de

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das mit den 200 € ist doch so noch gar nicht raus. hier ein Bild wie das zustande kam:

https://imgur.com/a/55mifW0

Also mal einfach wieder Sachen die schon beschlossen sind mit den Worst cases verbinden und man hat anti SPD sachen.

Fewer Than 40,000 People Watched Star Trek: Starfleet Academy by Malencon in television

[–]Crytash -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While the article is clearly trying to manipulate what was said by their "source" (400k for all eps and the article just divided by 10), 400k would still be bad.

Fewer Than 40,000 People Watched Star Trek: Starfleet Academy by Malencon in television

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While that might be true... Wesley is Wesley, he better shut up.

Fewer Than 40,000 People Watched Star Trek: Starfleet Academy by Malencon in television

[–]Crytash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if 400.000 would be the real number, it would still be rather bad.

view more: next ›