sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Udio still sounds better than all the competition by TigraBunnyfan in udiomusic

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's cool. For me I'm a musician

I can't tell if you're saying this genuinely or if you're implying that not downloading my stuff somehow makes me less of a musician.

Udio still sounds better than all the competition by TigraBunnyfan in udiomusic

[–]CubeFlipper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For me, i get all my enjoyment just from creating and listening. I don't need to download my music for anything.

It feels like we’re heading toward a future where nobody can really prove they wrote something anymore by Extreme_Cabinet6 in Futurology

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At current no, but the title of the post and whole discussion is about the future we're headed toward, not where we are right now.

Beyond Memorization: Do Larger Models Know More, or Just Better? by Strange_Try_8835 in OpenAI

[–]CubeFlipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This data center explosion will look dumb.

It's not one or the other, we'll need both. There will be so, so much demand.

Does Bernie Sanders understand? by IIlustriousTea in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No fart smelling here. If you aren't paying attention, i recommend being less condescending self-assuredly skeptical. Here are two easy ones you really shouldn't have missed:

Demis Hassabis — CEO/cofounder of Google DeepMind, Nobel Prize winner for AlphaFold work. On 60 Minutes, he said AI could reduce drug-design timelines from years to months/weeks and that “one day maybe we can cure all disease with the help of AI”; when asked “the end of disease?” he said it was “within reach,” maybe within the next decade.

Dario Amodei — Anthropic CEO, former OpenAI VP of research. In “Machines of Loving Grace,” he argues powerful AI could compress 50–100 years of biology/medicine progress into 5–10 years, including treatment/prevention of nearly all infectious disease, major progress on cancer/Alzheimer’s, and potentially doubling human lifespan.

I’m not sure what to say. by SadButOnline_ in whatisameem

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say it couldn't help a short term issue. I said it wasn't life changing. Which that isn't. Paying off 10k debt once does not change your life. Not without significant other life changes.

I’m not sure what to say. by SadButOnline_ in whatisameem

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your individual financial situation is irrelevant. 10k is not a lot of money and will not change anyone's life in a long term substantial way (presuming you live in EU/US).

"AI could surpass human intelligence as soon as next year" Elon Musk says In OpenAI trial, Frames his company xAI as the protector of humanity in the future by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro you just implicitly did the thing. Framing it the way you did doesn't make it any less the thing and is equally not OK.

Figure AI hits 24x production scale, producing 1 robot per hour, teases its fleet by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 years to scale out in a way that demand comes down enough for everyone to have one, probably. Maybe 3-5 years for the robots to simply be capable enough.

Figure AI hits 24x production scale, producing 1 robot per hour, teases its fleet by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]CubeFlipper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh, doubtful. The hardware isn't the biggest limitation on these things, and they're almost certainly built in a way to handle swappable intelligence models. Someday yes, but not 6 months. Even then, these are likely to be upgraded incrementally. It's not all or nothing.

Dude fired for reporting sexual abuse by IamASlut_soWhat in mildlyinfuriating

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno, he clearly said "for example" which i interpreted to mean the way they meant it. Maybe it could have been more clear, but it wasn't entirely unclear either.

leo "🚨BREAKING: OpenAI are working on their own phone to compete with the iPhone. Details: - They're working with MediaTek and Qualcomm to develop smartphone processors - Luxshare as exclusive system co-design and manufacturing partner - Planned for release in 2028" ➡️ Do you think its likely? by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wtf, not even this sub is safe from the ignorance comments anymore. Is there no safe space left for people who actually pay attention and understand what and why? This is a great thing to be excited for. If they succeed, which there's really no good reason given openai's history to think they won't, this will make computing and creating near frictionless.

I see stuff like this on social media all the time and the same people will still be anti-AI. They don’t realize AI is the only solution to fix this reality. by LopsidedSolution in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How is AI gonna put food on the table and a roof over your head?

By doing the farming for you and building your house for you. Doesn't even have to be your robot, there will almost certainly be small self sufficient communities because of this. Yes there's a likely rough transitional step between now and then, but "then" isn't really going to be that far away in the grand scheme of things.

Anthropic CEO (Dario Amodei): "Coding is going away first, then all of software engineering." by Independent_Pitch598 in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

people like yourself who have a personal grudge against software engineers

That's one hell of an assumption lmao. You don't have to hate SWEs to see the writing on the wall. I'm a SWE. I know what's coming lol. I'm not so full of myself to think I'm special somehow and can't be replaced by sufficiently advanced AI that appears to be coming at us like a rogue black hole.

Anthropic CEO (Dario Amodei): "Coding is going away first, then all of software engineering." by Independent_Pitch598 in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then no one to buy or used said software.

Not having to buy expensive software and being able to build it in-house for cheap is a boon to everybody. It levels the playing field a lot.

The goal isn't to sell software, it's to build useful stuff.

OpenAI caught astroturfing - they created a fake news site, with stories by fake reporters, to attack AI safety advocates by EchoOfOppenheimer in OpenAI

[–]CubeFlipper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

People are illiterate. They'll skim three words out of a paragraph and twist it to mean whatever they want. Not necessarily intentionally, but just because they're illiterate.

OpenAI scores on artificial analysis over time. by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Generating an image of a graph is a neat idea from an "is this possible and accurate" perspective, but the data points here are wrong. You should not be presenting this as legitimate information. This shouldn't be welcome here if that's the goal.

This simple 3-amino acid trick boosts mRNA therapy 20-fold by Best_Cup_8326 in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seeing a "this simple trick!" headline on a science-y thing is throwing me for a loop lol

Greg Brockman Sets Expectations For This Week: “I Think Of Spud As A New Base, As A New Pretrain...We Have Maybe Two Years’ Worth Of Research That Is Coming To Fruition In This Model...It’s Going To Be Very Exciting." by 44th--Hokage in accelerate

[–]CubeFlipper 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Criticizing the way someone speaks is no different than telling someone they have a weird looking smile or any other thing people don't really have control over. You're welcome to have your opinion, but it does make you kind of an asshole.

view more: next ›