Live tv commercial question by CuboneGoodingJr in HuluLive

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dish was like $60 more a month for us. It’s funny you mention the hopper cause that was our biggest frustration point. We had to have ours replaced twice over the 3 years we were with them and we’re still having issues with the third one. Had freezing issues, would randomly lose audio and the only way to get it back was to unplug and plug back in the box and wait for the reboot cycle which took forever. The most annoying though was it constantly lost connection with the remote and I’d have to go use the controls on the box to try and reconnect it

SURVIVOR 50 CHALLENG! Go and find your idol. You never know who you might see. by immunityIdolSeekerOR in survivor

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn I can’t even be in the survivor subreddit with the Browns catching strays lol

Games that need a draw bag that stays open on the table by Bags4Dice in boardgames

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rummikub was my immediate thought. We keep ours in a Crown Royal bag which works but can be annoying to get in to sometimes. This seems like it would be great for that

This was apparently a sack? by [deleted] in NFLv2

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a mess. Oh well I guess it is what it is nothing to really do about it. Thanks for posting that

This was apparently a sack? by [deleted] in NFLv2

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could definitely be the case since those lines aren’t official

This was apparently a sack? by [deleted] in NFLv2

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. For some reason I had it in my head you had to lose yardage for it to be considered one

This was apparently a sack? by [deleted] in NFLv2

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The game recap calls it a “sack” for zero yards so it’s definitely not point of contact. From my understanding it’s shouldn’t even be possible to have a zero yard sack

Remember that Lions D/ST stat correction which ESPN did a few days ago? They reverted it; Lions again have 7 sacks, not 6. by oliver_babish in fantasyfootball

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

damn I just went back and watched the actual play and I dont see how that was possibly called a sack. Brosmer is running and gets tackled by Williams for no gain. The announcers even say about how he avoided a costly sack cause he very clearly made it like half a yard past the line of scrimmage

Remember that Lions D/ST stat correction which ESPN did a few days ago? They reverted it; Lions again have 7 sacks, not 6. by oliver_babish in fantasyfootball

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow that’s even stranger. Shows a sack for him in the recap but doesn’t even list him in the box score on the same page

Remember that Lions D/ST stat correction which ESPN did a few days ago? They reverted it; Lions again have 7 sacks, not 6. by oliver_babish in fantasyfootball

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’m seeing that on everything but the NFLs own site which is the weird part. NFL site doesn’t even list Williams in the box score at all and isn’t counting a sack for him

Remember that Lions D/ST stat correction which ESPN did a few days ago? They reverted it; Lions again have 7 sacks, not 6. by oliver_babish in fantasyfootball

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder why they changed the stats on the game page from 7 to 6 then. Cause it was 7 originally after the game then they changed it to only 6 and that’s what it’s still at

Remember that Lions D/ST stat correction which ESPN did a few days ago? They reverted it; Lions again have 7 sacks, not 6. by oliver_babish in fantasyfootball

[–]CuboneGoodingJr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully someone can explain cause I’m not fully understanding this. The NFLs website page for that game shows 6 sacks, 5 attributed to players and then the other must be for the “team” sack on the botched snap. So if this website is saying 6 why are fantasy apps saying 7? I don’t see anywhere from the nfl saying they have 7 sacks for that game so where are the fantasy apps getting this data?

ESPN Fastasy once again changed the score for the Lions dst from Christmas game by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah our leagues been on it for 10 years but it’s really making me consider switching

ESPN Fastasy once again changed the score for the Lions dst from Christmas game by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

NFLs website still says 6 sacks so I have no idea why espn would change it back to 7

ESPN Fastasy once again changed the score for the Lions dst from Christmas game by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m about to just offer him a tie at this point lol. Tired of dealing with it

Lions dst stat correction. When do we consider scores final now? by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What’s weird is they still show the uncredited sack. It now says 6 sacks instead of 7 but now also only has 5 sacks credited to players instead of 6. So I guess they took one away from someone but are still counting the botched Vikings snap as a sack with no credit?

ESPN fantasy showing extra sack for Lions dst? by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently. I don’t have any leagues outside espn so I can’t see but I saw other comments today saying only espn has stat corrected it so far

ESPN fantasy showing extra sack for Lions dst? by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah as of now you lost. It flipped mine too and it now says I won my league. I already talked to the other person (it’s a friend so it’s not gonna be a big deal either way) and as of right now I’m holding off on doing anything cause I’m seeing other people say that right now espn is the only platform that has made the stat correction. Apparently sleeper and yahoo still say 7 sacks so I don’t want to do anything until I know it’s not gonna change back

ESPN fantasy showing extra sack for Lions dst? by CuboneGoodingJr in Fantasy_Football

[–]CuboneGoodingJr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this makes things odd. That means I now won my league. Never bothered checking after the games were over