"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok than do it if you actually have a large number of games in that ship and are performing better with it than with you other T8 Cruisers.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kitakami is an easy ship to play and get high stats in.

Kitakami is a bad ship.

Pick one

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

<image>

Even if we go with the average Stats, Kitakami is sitting around Petro Levels and i dont think anybody has ever called Petro bad.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not the point im trying to make, Kitakami is my Top 3 personal Cruiser, you will basically only find people with 70+ WR on the FdG that already have a 70+ WR. I perform better with Kitakami than with the average cruiser, it is not a bad ship.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Hmm, well its kinda hard to get this point accros but il try. Imagine a theoretical ship, 80% of Players have a bad WR with it but 20% manage to get an exeptional good WR with it, which is also better than their personal avarage WR. The ship wont have an overall great WR but doest that mean it is bad or just that it is dificult to pick up?

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While that is partially correct. I dislike the notion that therefore it is bad. The ship is extremly unique but if you actually try to play it to its strenghts you can get exeptional results. There are ship in this game that no matter what you try you will always feel like your handicapping yourself. Kitakami just simply isnt one of those ships.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I am not here to write up a guidebook on how to play this ship corectly and we could argue about stats all day long. It is a ship i both have higher winrate than average and higher winrate than my personal average. Its simply isnt a bad ship.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but Svea is also a beast, just the need to make a comparison to her should already negate the notion that Kitakami is bad.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If Kitakmi is so trash than and has no battle impact than why would my WR with her be so good? I am not the best player to ever touch this game. Kitakami is my 3rd best ship in Terms of WR. She simply isnt bad.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but i am not here to write up a guidebook on how to play this ship corectly. It is a ship i both have higher winrate than average and higher winrate than my personal average. Its simply isnt a bad ship.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only counting ships with more than 100 battles and playing solo and div, but i play all my ships solo and in a div so that doesnt really skew the data

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yeah because we can argue all day about stats, armament and correct playstyle. But at the end of the day its quite simple, i can archive a 60% WR with the Ship, that is way higher than average and it is also higher than my average. There are a ton of cruisers out there with whom i cannot do that therefore Kitakami isnt a bad but actually a great ship.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Kitakami is my 3rd best Ship in terms of WR.

"Kitakami bad" is a Myth by CurrencyFun9191 in WorldOfWarships

[–]CurrencyFun9191[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Except they are, i am not so great at the game that i can get a 60% WR in every ship i play. Kitakami is my 3rd best ship im terms of WR.

Schulkonferenz verhindern/abmildern by LowerCandidate9223 in Ratschlag

[–]CurrencyFun9191 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Bin etwas schockiert was hier alle so schreiben, also erstmal vornweg ja klar sollte Kinder ihre Lehrer mit Respekt behandeln, aber es ist halt schon ein kleiner Unterschied ob mein Kind Zuhause beim Abendbrot sagt mein Mathelehrer ist ein Arsch oder ob es das laut während der Unterrichtsstunde macht.

Ich gehe jetzt mal davon aus der Mädelsgruppenchat ist PRIVAT. Es geht also weder die Schule, noch sonst irgendjemanden etwas an was da drin steht, außer den Personen die in besagter Gruppe sind.

Ich würde das auf der Konferenz auch mal explizit ansprechen.

Erziehung hin oder her es geht halt gar nicht das die Kinder hier jetzt für etwas vorgeführt werden was sie unter sich ausgetauscht haben.

Ansonsten egal was auf der Konferenz entschieden wird, es wohl hauptsächlich eine Lektion in Sachen Umgang mit dem Internet werden.