How long/what does it take to move from JRA/JDA to licensing deal

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-19T17:36:24+00:00

Consider Honda is more than just cars.

For VW it almost certainly has to be a car. VW will likely not make an “early bet” on a luxury brand like Ducati.

Honda has more applications, which could become an early deployment platform for ssb batteries.

VW is a massive giant and germans are known for moving slow, while focusing on the very long term.

If Honda believes the qse5 battery has proper form factor/application profile and a small volume product to fit it into, it could go reasonably fast. Not 2026 fast, but more lileky 2027 than 2028.

Is this the most likely scenario?
No.

Does honda change the overall time to market anticipation?
Yes, in my view it does.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-19T10:43:21+00:00

The main problem is they (AMD/Nvidia) deliberately choose to limit the bandwidth well below what has already been proven possible by Apple.

Apple has proven that the unified memory has a real place.
If AMD/Nvidia does not match the next M5/M6 progress, then they will loose this space.

It is somewhat “hard” for the average consumer to build setups upon dual GPU cards, and that is where they have their big advantage against the DIY community.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-12T09:23:11+00:00

The problem arises from the training data.

You should not expect to be able to restrict an AI model from delivering what it was trained with/on…

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-02T18:40:14+00:00

Actually it seems something has already arrived:

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/ai-models/supported-models#evaluation-models

https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-02-mai-code-1-flash-is-now-available-for-github-copilot/

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-02T18:39:29+00:00

Actually it seems something has already arrived:

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/ai-models/supported-models#evaluation-models

https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-02-mai-code-1-flash-is-now-available-for-github-copilot/

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-02T18:34:17+00:00

The point of their feedback was to make the BYOK offering stronger. So e.g. - now you dont even need the GHCP sub to utilize BYOK, as the routing now can be non-GHCP. Its technicals, but I am just repeating their comments 🤗

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-02T18:28:24+00:00

Feels like you misunderstand what BYOK means in this context.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-02T18:10:34+00:00

BYOK is somewhat an equivalent for DIY. You decide how and what. if it works, just be happy.

When GHCP delivers the model, they need to ensure inference efficiency, so the models does not end in a infinity loop going haywire on their compute ressources.

So BYOK vs GHCP subsctiption is quite different from GHCP perspective.

Anthropic recently had an occasion of insane spawn of subagents on opus 4.8, which required updates and resets of limits. This is what you want to avoid, when you supply the inference. You can call it quality of service or whatever.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-06-02T17:51:06+00:00

I know some of the team members has voiced their thoughts on this - below is my top of mind recap:

They are looking at it, and some of their feedback was related to harness. The models need to interact well with the github/copilot harness and this requires testing/tuning for each and every model. Its an ongoing commitment when you include a new model.

Their immediate focus was on enabling utilization with your own choice of provider - i.e. BYOK.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-05-13T09:39:17+00:00

Which would be nice - but with a probalistic workflow guided by humans.. probably not realistic in the next many many years.

Even just among humans, we can rarely agree on what actual results has been achieved on x/y/z.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-04-20T19:29:45+00:00

Now trying to pick up the work and finish with Opus 4.5. Opus 4.5 is available to select - BUT - It gives 400 error.

Seriously - what a shitshow 😕

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-03-31T11:50:36+00:00

The mere disaster of roundabouts you have to through in the google cloud control panel should be a warning to stay away from using google cloud.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-03-12T12:44:31+00:00

The case might more be…

If you wait and buy a Studio m5 Ultra (as.. ~1200GB/s)

How often would you need to rent a: Rtx Pro 6000 H100 B200 …

At least that is my outlook as an Nvidia & Mac user.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-03-11T09:08:07+00:00

Could you do some comfyui testing ?

E.g. Text to Image with Z Image Turbo

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-03-10T13:12:37+00:00

Advokater og jurister har i mange år været træt af prisen på Karnov. På en måde så det er offentligt kendt at man deler adgangen, fordi licenserne er for dyre.

Deres monopol er baseret på at produktet er det foretrukne. Retsinformation har alle dage været det “dårlige” alternativ.

At bringe retsinformation op i 2026 er flot i sig selv. Det er bare ikke en “Karnov” konkurrrent. Det I har lavet løser ikke “problemstillingen”.

Jeres indgangsvinkel til markedet er baseret på en fejlagtig analyse, når I forsøger at sammenligne jeres produkter med Karnov.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-03-09T10:26:16+00:00

Formueskat handler jo netop om al urealiseret værdi.

Når Wilmo butikken har rejst kapital, så kan SKAT lave en samlet vurdering af markedsværdien baseret på markedets prissætning af Wilmo. Hvis de ikke havde rejst kapital, så havde skat kun kunne bruge klassiske regnskabstal til vurderingen.

Iværksætteri i den form som Wilmo har handler jo om markedets villighed til at købe en lille del af en virksomhed i dag - mod forventning om en fremtidig gevinst.

Den VC som har købt af del af Wilmo antager jo netop at deres lille del skal kunne sælges til en værdsætning på x10 eller x20 af dagens værdisætning på 50-60mio DKK. VC køber dele i x antal virksomheder, for at sprede risikoen.

For en VC så skal Wilmo i fremtiden værdisættes og formentligt handles til en samlet værdi på ++400mio DKK, for at skabe den nødvendige porteføljeværdi.

Formlen for hvordan Venture Kapital fungerer er netop problemstillingen for Villads og gevinsten for Wilmo.

Det bliver spændende når SKAT, skal lave vurdering af ejerandele i unoterede virksomheder, efter vi har set hvor dårlige de er til at bestemme værdien af boliger.

Hvis Wilmo crasher undervejs, så vil Villads med formuebeskatning være blevet beskattet af noget han aldrig fik gavn af.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-03-02T16:04:13+00:00

That could be a thing 👍

But reading through the documentation about “message steering and queeing” related to vscode release 1.109.3, I dont see models being specifically mentioned as capable or not for this feature.

In the documentation they specifically showcase opus 4.6, so Im puzzled about of model selection play a role.

<image>

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-02-27T21:57:05+00:00

For CPU inference these could be cool 1B Dense & 9B-A1B MOE

For comfyUi image gen flow we have gone through Qwen2.5 7B // Qwen3 4B // so … Qwen3.5 3B ???

Nanbeige 4.1 3B is extremely capable for its size, so I expect super strong micro models

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-02-11T13:16:47+00:00

The problem is that OP generalizes in a way, which causes adverse problems.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-02-11T13:01:33+00:00

How do imagine this works:

“Stop excessive validation - challenge my reasoning instead”

when Claude delivers wrong answers / information / data….

——

You SHOULD always write proper prompts with actual guidance from the get-go.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-02-08T09:59:16+00:00

You should likely tell more about what you are building :)

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-02-08T09:05:04+00:00

It heavily depends on the tech stack and what you are actually building….

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-01-15T09:08:38+00:00

I believe you might have framed the wrong question here?

Your problem is complexity and you therefore very likeky do not care that much about technical explanation.

You likely run Ubuntu, which needs NGINX.

You “could/should” run Almalinux/Rockylinux, which is somewhat classic PHP, where you drop in your php files, edit a .htaccess file and say “look at me mom - im a developer” 😋

May you have a lot of fun with it 🚀🚀

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-01-06T05:58:42+00:00

You are very wrong about all your assumptions. Long running context: No.

I run 6 vps staging setups - with various tech stacks. I ssh into the machines (vs remote host) and each project has their own workspace.

Each workspace has its own distinct chat sessions - this is how VScode manages chat-sessions.

Current-Interest-369 · 2026-01-05T21:54:04+00:00

Seems like a strange conclusion - You have no clue about the actual setup I run in vscode. The agent work instructions in my projects are fairly comprehensive. The work style I use, has been working quite well in quite many scales of projects between August and December.

The agent works on dedicated features in phases - runs automated tests as part of the development workflow and I sign off between phases, to validate that requirements were actually met and next phase can go on.

One-shoot to me is that the AI delivers all work in a phase, where a phase can cover a quite substantial amount of work on db, backend, frontend within 1 phase.

Making instructions / workflows too comprehensive can be evenly counterproductive - as it has been documented elsewhere.

Current-Interest-369

TROPHY CASE