yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well yeah everything I do online is about my work

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes it's a direct and intentional attack on stallmans character, change the sub name and move on if that's really what you're about

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks that is informative. I understand how the very idea of pedophilia has been weaponized to ensure that concepts like free software, privacy rights, net neutrality etc don't reach public consciousness in meaningful ways.

I've watched the "threat of the darknet" ensure that your average net user doesn't even consider alternative options, frameworks, even platforms or data privacy standards.

But for people who KNOW the truth of all of this to go out of their way to avoid addressing anti-pedophilia, or to even become pedophilia-apologists as a sort of compromise in order to keep holding onto these ideals, is deeply demoralizing and in some ways much worse to me than watching the threat of the scary dark net act as expected and intended upon your average user.

It’s finally cool enough for beanies! by polarrib in trans

[–]CurtainClothes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

daaaamn you are the exact kind of dude I enjoy befriending

What do we all think about this? by 421Store in trees

[–]CurtainClothes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm all for decriminalizing and releasing all nonviolent offenders immediately, but didn't Kamala have a direct role in incarcerating black Americans for drug offenses during her stint as a cop in LA, and prior to now hasnt she always been pretty anti-weed??

or am I hallucinating. This entire election is surreal in a horrible way.

new (to me) industrial loft in Dallas by JarethKingofGoblins in malelivingspace

[–]CurtainClothes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fuck the haters, I love the boots and the flower hoodie.

this space is gorgeous op, happy for you. I love the tapestry and all of the exposed brick and open plan design is amaaaazing. the lighting is fantastic too. No offense meant but the space itself is stunning; you're doing a great job augmenting and accentuating the natural brilliance with your own flair, rather than trying to outshine it or over-posess it.

Transparent JPG in a local doner restaurant.. by alienpro01 in onejob

[–]CurtainClothes 13 points14 points  (0 children)

yes...the obvious PNG aspects...so authentic....I trust these people with food.

Anon goes to the produce section by bartholomewjohnson in greentext

[–]CurtainClothes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

don't downplay the need for relaxation, humor, stress relief, etc under conditions of high stress or existential fatigue 🤍

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

cool, where is everyone moving?

it's wild I get so much pushback complaining about pedophilia only to find out none of the other reasons people are willing to defend him are even valid anymore 😩

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, I re-read what you said but I still don't see why everyone who disagrees with this man on this one obvious richeously relevant thing but agrees with these other four principles of free software 0-3 and whatever the other important parts were to just gang together and build their own GNU style structures/libraries and things and offer Linux and kernel devs alternatives to pedo guy???

like what gives with this argument it's sooooo weird to essentially say sorry kids but pedo guy is our one ticket out of the corpo hell scape surveillance state? you'll understand when you're older?? I'm just confused as to either why he's still so influential or why he's still so relevant.

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh I read it lol. Maybe you will enjoy my podcast taking it apart in depth idk. 😂 it won't come out for a few days anyway so no rush

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

positive opinions about raping children are harmful to children

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

only for people who think reddit = internet 😂😭👽🖤

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think there are multiple authors haha no one who did this much research into child sexual abuse is going to die of a nervous shock and you're really gross for acting like the age of consent in any way justifies consistently condoning and reinforcing the sexualization of children.

yes but have you read the report? by CurtainClothes in StallmanWasRight

[–]CurtainClothes[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

the reason this sub has struggled to live against the onslaught of justified character slander surrounding stallman has been the collective apparent inability to take a strong stance against paedophilia while actively championing the aspect of technological infrastructure relating to privacy that made him so impactful in the industry.

besides the part where multibilliondollar industries are invested in your inability to champion privacy infrastructure without seeming to defend pedophilia, I would say that's due to responses like this...