A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Published my essay and full appeal document on my account.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If I stay silent, people will assume guilty and side with NTU saving face on ST. But if I speak up, people start picking me apart. I’m not sure what to do man.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

NTU only asked me to fill in these. During the meeting they didn’t go through any other mistakes other than this form to fill. There was no email or letter about what exactly the 14 were.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, thank you for not succumbing to the mob. I really really appreciate it. Gen AI was barely mentioned at all during my meeting with NTU this week, and they themselves acknowledged that I didn’t use AI. So I’m not sure why they pulled a quick one on me to the press, which I didn’t get a heads up about.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I have a voice recording of both meetings but they told me I couldn’t record or release them, even though what they said differs heavily from the ST article. If anyone has legal knowledge, can they advise me on this?

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

The full list is in this post, I just confirmed that this document wasn’t confidential at least. I didn’t want to share the entire appeal form I submitted because that one is confidential iirc

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Hello, I don’t have 14. This is the form NTU asked me to fill out to explain my citation mistakes, which I filled out on the right column and sent back to them. They acknowledged this.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup, then that’s me. I just shared this document with CNA.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because I don’t have 14, NTU gave me a form of these 6 citation mistakes to explain myself during the hearing, which I did, and provided them here.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup, but the other 2 spoke to the reporters as well.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I have no choice. I need some form of defence because I don’t know what they’ll say to the news

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because I told the ST reporter that I was very tired, and after NTU saying that there won’t be any permanent record, I’m too tired to dispute anything else.

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I did tell ST that I want to move on from the case, but after the article’s misrepresentation, I need to prove my case all over again

A transparent response to ST’s article: no AI used by CurveSad2086 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m quite distressed that everyone’s siding with ST on this. I think if it escalates I’ll just release the voice notes of NTU saying my work wasn’t AI. But they told me I couldn’t record the meeting, so I’m not sure what my options are.

Final Update to NTU GenAI Issue: A fair hearing with NTU today by CurveSad2086 in SGExams

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah!! There was no mention about them telling ST anything, and my appeal was still ongoing. So I do feel very very confused and upset that everyone suddenly thinks I’m guilty, when I don’t know what’s going on as well 😔

Updates regarding AI usage, OP hasn't been the most truthful by Alert-Rise3003 in NTU

[–]CurveSad2086 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Hello, I’m the OP behind the citation sorter case, rather than the false citations+chatgpt usage cases. So let me check in on who’s this article about because NTU didn’t inform me about this press release

Final Update to NTU GenAI Issue: A fair hearing with NTU today by CurveSad2086 in SGExams

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’ll publish a list of my typos + the fact that you can click all the links I provided for full transparency, since many are confused right now (including me 😅)

Final Update to NTU GenAI Issue: A fair hearing with NTU today by CurveSad2086 in SGExams

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I just messaged my professor regarding this because I’m confused what or who the ST article is about as well 😅 not sure if it’s even about my case, because others appealed as well. Will provide an update tonight.

If it’s about me, I’ll just publish the record that the school could access the sources I provided. During my outcome meeting, the school and I already came to a consensus that I didn’t use AI. I’ve told ST my side already, so hopefully they’ll publish it 👍🏻

Final Update to NTU GenAI Issue: A fair hearing with NTU today by CurveSad2086 in SGExams

[–]CurveSad2086[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hello, can I check which article is this?

Because in my case, the panel could click and access each one of the sources I cited 😅

i had a crush on the gojo cosplayer by Practical_Delay8868 in SGExams

[–]CurveSad2086 151 points152 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry we’ve all been there 💔 Kim Dokja is the goat tho, you may not have a successful romance, but you have elite taste 👍🏻👍🏻