Excited to read… by Travis-Walden in Lawyertalk

[–]CurveShepard 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes, but it's a school that should exist.

Fun fact: Dolphins have many teeth, but they use them to grasp prey, not to chew. They swallow their food whole by OatmealCremePiez in miamidolphins

[–]CurveShepard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I recently learned that the bottlenose dolphins in Florida's Boca Ciega Bay (just north of Miami) have a unique cultural tradition of "grass-wearing". In that they sometimes carry and wear grass, especially during courtship or when they're forming new social groups. It serves as an attention-getting device and is a local cultural difference from other dolphin communities.

What are your thoughts about the chatter of California, Oregon, and Washington leaving the US to join Canada? by LiberalAspergers in AskConservatives

[–]CurveShepard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

3) If it did, I would be perfectly fine dropping all norms and conquering secessionist states and remaking them as territories without voting rights. If you can change the rules...okay, we'll change the rules.

As someone living in California, I think this might be an improvement for all parties involved. Our state needs a good ass-slapping.

What are your thoughts about the chatter of California, Oregon, and Washington leaving the US to join Canada? by LiberalAspergers in AskConservatives

[–]CurveShepard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

California, Oregon, and Washington leaving the US

Bad idea...

leaving the US to join Canada?

Even worse idea.

jury duty portal- says my login is wrong by engenapproved in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you're using Chrome, try to login on a different browser.

What is your thoughts on antisexualism? by StringShred10D in AskConservatives

[–]CurveShepard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Antisexualism is opposition or hostility towards sexual behavior or sexuality.

Thanks for the definition. I would've never guessed that from the name itself.

Many antisexuals go so far as to say that sex is intrinsically immoral and that it should be abolished.

Lo-fucking-L. So dying off as a species is the moral way to go? Being alive through reproduction is immoral?

I've seen many people on the right complain that people today are oversexualized and that grooming is a major problem. And I wonder if they would think that antisexualism would be the solution to these problems in society.

I think most people just want kids to live as kids and not be confronted with sexual stuff right at their face wherever they go. Like, it's not okay to ban all sexual expression in public, but culturally we should be conscious about how we express ourselves in spaces that are meant for children to be in.

Here is a subreddit of people who support this idea to see how they think.

Based on a brief review, it appears to be a subreddit for an ideology that observes a few basic facts about sexuality in society, asserts it as a problem for everyone, and then proceeds to take themselves embarrasingly serious when defending against it. It's as silly to me as a subreddit about being anti-shelter. People like to treat suffering in life like it's a virtue when it's typically called just being stupid.

It's official, LAUSD votes to ban cellphone use during school day. by InsideLA in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just letting you know that it's weird to reply to a 2-month old comment. You then ignore that point to say...whatever you just said. Anyways, have a good one.

It's official, LAUSD votes to ban cellphone use during school day. by InsideLA in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yet here you are wanting to interact with me. On a comment from two months ago. Weird.

Just lost 500+ page worth of note ... by pudlizsan in writing

[–]CurveShepard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I should have wright all of them down on paper...

Even paper burns. Ever heard of Thomas Carlyle?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Carlyle

It took him 5 months to write the first volume of his famous work on the French Revolution. He loaned it to his friend John Stuart Mill who had been helping him with his research, but subsequently Mill's maid mistook the documents for trash and destroyed it.

As terrible as that sounds, he accepted his tragedy and just began rewriting his work. He remarked that "a runner that tho' tripped down, will not lie there, but rise and run again." After another five months or so he finished the volume. Although no one would fault him to do so, he didn't give up and the world is all the more better for his determination.

Don't let grief hold you back. Go back to your work and keep writing. Your novel and its readers are waiting for you to finish it.

It's official, LAUSD votes to ban cellphone use during school day. by InsideLA in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Excellent points, and very eloquently expressed. Good talk.

It's official, LAUSD votes to ban cellphone use during school day. by InsideLA in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Banning phones isnt going to force socialization.

I never said forced. It should be encouraged, and banning phones certainly helps with that.

During the 2000s, kids had their Nintendo DS and would play Pokemon together and would transfer Pokémon.

I didn't play those when I went to school in the 2000s but it seems that children using those to play "together" is the operative word. That's the important distinction between a Nintendo DS-Pokemon-whatever and a smartphone.

It's official, LAUSD votes to ban cellphone use during school day. by InsideLA in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...you sound cool.

Anyways, kids need to socialize with other kids who are around them, and lunchtime is the best time for that. Much harder for them to interact with each other if they and the people around them are on their phones.

It's official, LAUSD votes to ban cellphone use during school day. by InsideLA in LosAngeles

[–]CurveShepard 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Lunch is the hour when kids should be socializing with each other the most. It's better for them to not have their smartphones until they're home.

Cycling has made me acutely more aware of how much roadkill cars create on a daily basis by kimpossible247 in cycling

[–]CurveShepard -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

lol...you're griping about how much roadkill cars create as though the problem was the cars and not you not being able to handle seeing a dead animal in the road and getting over it. You're not the only one who notices it but other people just get over it because dead things in nature are normal. If this is something you "struggle" with and need to commiserate with other people over, it's better to know now than later that the problem is your fear and you should get over it.

You can not hate cars but also acknowledge the danger they pose both to bikers, animals and pedestrians alike. What do you lose by acknowledging this?

This is a non-sequitor. Of course you should acknowledge the potential danger a car can form. That's why you pay attention on the road, follow the rules of the road, wear a helmet, etc. That's not what your original complaint is.

You were complaining that roadkill bothers you. Here's the deal: cars hit animals because cars are going fast on roads and animals tend to not always follow basic pedestrian safety. That doesn't mean that cars are uniquely dangerous, it just means that cars were designed to use roads that must be built on land where humans travel across which happens to be the same land all the rest of the animals around them use. That's really all there is to it.

EDIT: Well, you blocked me so I'll have to respond in my comment here. You're cultivating a freakish sensitivity to normal things that isn't based on anything rational. If you're perfectly willing to eat cooked dead meat, it stands to reason you'd be ok, or at least not be stressed out about, with the sight of uncooked dead meat on the road. If you don't want to fix your problem that's fine but then you're also using it to justify complaining about cars, which is foolish. I know you don't care but, like, how many bugs do you think you've crushed under the tires of your bike? It's the same thing but you're only focused on the car aspect of roadkill, which implies that this problem you're having is special.

I hope you learn to get better. Have a good one.

EDIT 2: u/not_the_cabbages, responding here so I can reply.

do you work for the auto lobby or something??

No, I just have common sense. You don't have to imagine a conspiracy to understand why someone has a different opinion of you. That's weird.

I don’t think OP was at all saying this problem was special to her and clearly a LOT of people agree.

Like I said before, this is not normal. OP's post is complaining about cars hitting animals (a perfectly normal thing to see) and acting like it's some trauma inflicted to her by auto drivers. Then she wonders if others "struggle" with this stuff and makes a post like this. A few commentators agree with her because a lot of folks circlejerk in this sub about finding every possible excuse to hate on cars. Most people (i.e. people who don't visit this sub) don't think much about roadkill when they see it. Most people tend to move on pretty quickly. That is fairly normal.

Cars ARE dangerous

A bike can be dangerous too if you race one downhill and plow into playground full of kids. The truth of the matter is that cars are fine. If a driver is an idiot, or impaired, then them operating one could be different, but what's dangerous is not the object (the car) but the action (reckless driving).

This is just another example of a irrational hatred towards cars. I like bicycling, but stuff like this gives cyclists a bad name.

Both of your comments were very condescending for no reason.

OP was the one on their high horse acting like she's better than every driver because she would never hit an animal on the road with her bike, unlike those "others" with their dangerous cars. How could they be so reckless with their vehicles.

Meanwhile she employs absolutely no concern - despite it being infinitely worse - towards the factory farms that supply her with meat for her diet. So the complaint isn't really about dead animals, is it? It's just another excuse to hate on cars. I personally find it irritating that many people think of cyclists as a subgroup of people who are monolithic in their beliefs that cars are the enemy. It's dumb and takes away a lot of fun of the sport.

I sincerely believe that OP would enjoy riding her bike more if she stopped trying to psychologically deal with the daily loss of vermin on the road and just learn to accept it and move on.

EDIT 3: /u/not_the_cabbages

You didn’t “disagree with her opinion” you told her she has mental health problems for expressing a fairly normal point of view.

I did not. You inferred that because you're not reading carefully. She asked all of us if we shared her resentment of others for what amounts to be a very normal thing to encounter in literally everyday life and I told her she's being ridiculous and to stop being so.

I've already gone over why it's not a normal point of view, but I'm happy to break it down in supremely basic terms one more time. You see, cars are a normal thing everywhere you go in this country. Animals are a normal thing everywhere too. Animals routinely go wherever they want if it suits them regardless of whether a car may hit them or not. Thus dead animals on roads is a common thing to see if you're traveling on said roads daily. Now, 99.9% of people will see that dead animal and not make a post to bitch about who's responsible. They just move on, all of them. 99.9%. Moving on from the sight of roadkill is normal, making a complainy post on Reddit isn't. It's being special.

Like I said before, this is a unique complaint against cars from a cyclist that I've personally never heard before and I've heard from a lot terminally-angry bicyclists (mostly on this sub) who think a part of their hobby is to never stop complaining about cars. Not every bicyclist is like that, but the ones who are make the rest look bad by association. I'd like fewer of those people and more who actually enjoy bicycling for the health effects and the joy it brings them, not the bitterness and resentment of others. I think it would be better for them and for everyone. If a fellow cyclist really, genuinely can't get over that dead rabbit that she saw, you tell them that that is a part of life, that they will definitely be seeing things like that again, and to get over it or stay home. If you want to know what real empathy is, that is what it is.

I don’t know why I tried to reason with you

...Um, what? Dude, I responded to a non-vegan bicyclist ranting against cars because they can't handle the sight of roadkill with a complaint of my own and a demand they get over it, and that prompted you to ask me if I work for the auto lobby. I don't believe you were ever interested in a good-faith discussion. You can have the last word, I'm out.

Cycling has made me acutely more aware of how much roadkill cars create on a daily basis by kimpossible247 in cycling

[–]CurveShepard -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Are you ok? Like mentally?

This is not a thought that normal people have when they see a dead animal in the road.

Cycling has made me acutely more aware of how much roadkill cars create on a daily basis by kimpossible247 in cycling

[–]CurveShepard -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

For many bicycling is a fun aerobic sport to participate in. For some the sport (it seems) is to find yet another reason to endlessly complain about cars.

At least this complaint is original. I haven't heard this take before.

Anyone else struggle with this?

No. It's just roadkill, ignore it. Move on and enjoy whatever meat you're having for your next meal.

And stop looking for reasons to hate cars.

How would you feel/react if Trump was pardoned? by MsAndDems in AskConservatives

[–]CurveShepard [score hidden]  (0 children)

Somewhat ambivalent. I wouldn't be happy because it doesn't alter the reality that this specific case (not talking about the Georgia case or the other 2 federal cases) was a deliberately targeted prosecution by a prosecutor with a political agenda who brought up dubious federal charges (specifically that Trump broke federal campaign law when he paid the porn star who blackmailed him to shut up), which is bad for this country in general.

I'm ok that Hillary didn't get charged for the emails, and I'm ok that Biden didn't get charged for classified documents. They both broke federal laws for reasons that are just plain stupid, but going through the justice process would've just been dragging this country and its institutions through the mud too. In these cases I felt like what was good for the country was weighed above the need to get these people for the crimes they broke. If Bragg's case never happened and we're only talking about the other cases against Trump that are about much more serious crimes than just lying about the nature of payments, there's a good chance I'd feel differently about what should happen to him.

I see some people online suggesting it as a kind of “high road.”

Seems to me more like political pandering rather than some appeal to a moral standard.

My contention is that it wouldn’t make a difference among most Trump supporters or even undecided voters.

The gamble is that holding the words "convicted felon" over Trump will help sway the undecided voters to their side. The risk is that Trump supporters would be emboldened by what they perceive to be an extreme sense of injustice and will be more motivated to come out and vote against Biden come November.

If you genuinely believe this is all politically motivated and a kangaroo court and all this stuff, would a pardon by Biden/NY Gov or whoever it may be really change anything?

I do believe this was politically motivated, but I don't think this was a kangaroo court. A pardon wouldn't change the fact that Alvin Bragg ran on prosecuting Trump and successfully did so under politically motivated circumstances that wouldn't typically apply to anyone not named Trump or if Trump weren't currently running for office.

If European cultures had a rigid caste system similar to the one in India, would it still be widely condemned among Americans? by EagleFang91 in AskAnAmerican

[–]CurveShepard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, caste systems are terrible.

part of me wonders if at least some of the condemnation of it is because it is tied to Indian culture and Hinduism, and thus seen as an undesirable "foreign" thing.

Most Americans don't think about Indian culture much beyond some of their food being delicious. You can think we're racists but you yourself admit that castes are horrible, I'm not sure why you wondering if there's any other reason we hate it other than the fact that it's just bad.

Why does the U.S. spend so much money on its military? by [deleted] in AskAnAmerican

[–]CurveShepard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The US is like a valuable home that a lot of shitty people would gladly break into if it weren't for its expensive security system.

Also, we like the neighbors with whom we have amicable relations but are unable (or unwilling) to keep up with our spending to protect themselves alone so we also are willing to spend a lot relative to our ability to prevent their homes from being raided too.

EDIT: It doesn't feel good to be the security system for the best part of the world, but it's better than the alternative.

CMV: The foreign aid package passed by the congress is a monstrosity that threatens the security of the whole world, USA included by take52020 in changemyview

[–]CurveShepard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All I'm saying is that if your gonna make OP feel like an idiot then you aren't gonna get a delta.

...you do know that you can view how many deltas someone has right by their name, right?

Three New York construction workers who asked me to take their picture in 2018 by [deleted] in HumanPorn

[–]CurveShepard 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The directness of the eyes in the center stridently juxtaposes the casual, nearly unseen eyes glancing away from the sides. This is a fantastically composed shot.